David C: A Closed-minded bigot?

Originally posted by Nemesio
I am sure Ivanhoe has done his RHP duty and alerted this ad hominem attack on another RHP user.

Nemesio

Until these allegations can be proved in a court of law, please restrain yourself and leave my double out of this... (solemn cough)

Originally posted by RatX
Until these allegations can be proved in a court of law, please restrain yourself and leave my double out of this... (solemn cough)

IIRC, under libel law, it is the responsibility of the person making the allegations to prove them.

Too bad no1 isn't around. <- one of the few times you'll hear me say that! 😀

Originally posted by lucifershammer
IIRC, under libel law, it is the responsibility of the person making the allegations to prove them.

Too bad no1 isn't around. <- one of the few times you'll hear me say that! 😀

Noted... (another solemn cough) 😉

Originally posted by lucifershammer
IIRC, under libel law, it is the responsibility of the person making the allegations to prove them.

Too bad no1 isn't around. <- one of the few times you'll hear me say that! 😀

You are rhp's resident lawyer now?
What little knowlege I have of libel cases , the plaintiff needs to meet some criteria beyond asserting its untrue before the defendant needs to "prove" anything.
Nothing is as black and white as you seem to think it is.

Originally posted by Nemesio
I am sure Ivanhoe has done his RHP duty and alerted this ad hominem attack on
another RHP user.

Nemesio

Yes. Ivanhoe, could you please state for the record that you have in fact alerted this thread, in accordance with your recent appeal to the community to eradicate this sort of misbehavior.

Originally posted by DoctorScribbles
Yes. Ivanhoe, could you please state for the record that you have in fact alerted this thread, in accordance with your recent appeal to the community to eradicate this sort of misbehavior.

The source of all this bickering is David C, his insults and his accusing me and RatX of having multiple accounts.

I asked the mods/admins to inform David C that his accusations have no basis and are not true.
In fact these baseless accusations are part of the continuous harrassment I have to endure, because I am an orthodox Roman-Catholic.

If you or anybody else feel alerting a post because it is against the ToS, please go ahead. It is your right as an RHP member. I will not inform you whether I have alerted this thread or not, because, in both cases, it would undoubtedly be another reason to continue your "investigation". See ya and have fun.

Originally posted by ivanhoe

In fact these baseless accusations are part of the continuous harrassment I have to endure, because I am an orthodox Roman-Catholic.

LMAO! You are so deluded.

Originally posted by DoctorScribbles
LMAO! You are so deluded.

wtf is an orthodox Roman Catholic?

Originally posted by frogstomp
wtf is an orthodox Roman Catholic?

An RC who is not heterodox.

Cheers,

LH

Originally posted by lucifershammer
An RC who is not heterodox.

Cheers,

LH

which is just as meaningless an adjective to apply to Roman Catholicism.

Originally posted by frogstomp
You are rhp's resident lawyer now?
What little knowlege I have of libel cases , the plaintiff needs to meet some criteria beyond asserting its untrue before the defendant needs to "prove" anything.
Nothing is as black and white as you seem to think it is.

Defamation consists of the following:

(1) a defamatory statement;

(2) published to third parties; and

(3) which the speaker or publisher knew or should have known was false.†

---
† http://www.abbottlaw.com/defamation.html#I.

Originally posted by frogstomp
which is just as meaningless an adjective to apply to Roman Catholicism.

het·er·o·dox ( P ) Pronunciation Key (htr--dks)
adj.
1. Not in agreement with accepted beliefs, especially in church doctrine or dogma.
2. Holding unorthodox opinions. †

---
† http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=heterodox

Originally posted by lucifershammer
het·er·o·dox ( P ) Pronunciation Key (htr--dks)
adj.
1. Not in agreement with accepted beliefs, especially in church doctrine or dogma.
2. Holding unorthodox opinions. †

---
† http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=heterodox

In that case the Greek Orthodox Catholic Church has it right and orthodoxy in the RCC is rightly heterodoxy since the capitalize the O word.

Originally posted by ivanhoe
The source of all this bickering is David C, his insults and his accusing me and RatX of having multiple accounts.

I asked the mods/admins to inform David C that his accusations have no basis and are not true.
In fact these baseless accusations are part of the continuous harrassment I have to endure, because I am an orthodox Roman-Catholic.

If you ...[text shortened]... it would undoubtedly be another reason to continue your "investigation". See ya and have fun.

The source of all this bickering is David C

I am? Wow.

his insults and his accusing me and RatX of having multiple accounts.

I did? Where? Please cite an example of these insults, I'll decide whether or not an apology is appropriate. Also, please cite an example of me having 'accused' you of having another account named 'RatX'. I'll be waiting...

Originally posted by lucifershammer
Defamation consists of the following:

(1) a defamatory statement;

(2) published to third parties; and

(3) which the speaker or publisher knew or should have known was false.†

---
† http://www.abbottlaw.com/defamation.html#I.

the 3) is far different than your original assertion

and that's even if it was shown to be a false statement, which it has not been as of yet.