22 Sep 05
Originally posted by frogstompActually, my statement is true under common law†, but some jurisdictions have been shifitng more burden of proof to the plaintiff.
the 3) is far different than your original assertion
and that's even if it was shown to be a false statement, which it has not been as of yet.
---
† http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/hrj/iss13/docherty.shtml for instance
22 Sep 05
Originally posted by lucifershammerBut what is the rule in the Court of Ivanhoe?
Actually, my statement is true under common law†, but some jurisdictions have been shifitng more burden of proof to the plaintiff.
---
† http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/hrj/iss13/docherty.shtml for instance
22 Sep 05
Originally posted by lucifershammeralso how much protection does an internet alias get,, isn't the main purpose of nicknames to protect privacy.
Actually, my statement is true under common law†, but some jurisdictions have been shifitng more burden of proof to the plaintiff.
---
† http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/hrj/iss13/docherty.shtml for instance
If I said Ivanhoe has caught veneral disease from a dead goat , for instance, which I assume wouldn't be true, would that be libel unless I attached he real name , which not only do I not know I have no desire to know.
Nobody has to worry that I would say such a thing either as I rarely insult dead goats.
22 Sep 05
Originally posted by David COriginally posted by RatX
his insults and his accusing me and RatX of having multiple accounts.
I did? Where? Please cite an example of these insults, I'll decide whether or not an apology is appropriate. Also, please cite an example of me having 'accused' you of having another account named 'RatX'. I'll be waiting...[/b]
Yes! I have a following...
This turd of a forum doesn't deserve my two-cent, I'm outta here!!!
Originally posted by David C.
Just as long as your other username goes with you.
I don't want to waste time trying to find the links you made between Ivanhoe and me, but this was just a recent spill of relentless fluff. Oh, don't worry, none of your comments to me deserve the title of "insult". When it comes to figuring out your apologising or not, don't apologise, you were just being you...
Peace and I'm off to sleep!
22 Sep 05
Originally posted by RatXhmmm...don't recall having addressed you, RatX, but I appreciate your input. I fail to see any accusation aimed at ivanhoe in the instance you offered. Perhaps you should reconsider 'wasting time to find the links', or stick to not playing chess.
[b]Originally posted by RatX
Yes! I have a following...
This turd of a forum doesn't deserve my two-cent, I'm outta here!!!
Originally posted by David C.
Just as long as your other username goes with you.
I don't want to waste time trying to find the links you made between Ivanhoe and me, but this was just a recent spill of relentless fluff. O ...[text shortened]... apologising or not, don't apologise, you were just being you...
Peace and I'm off to sleep![/b]
23 Sep 05
Originally posted by RatXPersonally I think the quoted section paints you in a worse light than it does your accusee.
[b]Originally posted by RatX
Yes! I have a following...
This turd of a forum doesn't deserve my two-cent, I'm outta here!!!
Originally posted by David C.
Just as long as your other username goes with you.
I don't want to waste time trying to find the links you made between Ivanhoe and me, but this was just a recent spill of relentless fluff. O ...[text shortened]... apologising or not, don't apologise, you were just being you...
Peace and I'm off to sleep![/b]
23 Sep 05
Originally posted by David CYes, Dave, memory's a tricky thing... If I find more time to blow on these forums and spend more quality time with you, I shall certainly do so.
hmmm...don't recall having addressed you, RatX, but I appreciate your input. I fail to see any accusation aimed at ivanhoe in the instance you offered. Perhaps you should reconsider 'wasting time to find the links', or stick to not playing chess.
23 Sep 05
1 edit
Originally posted by David CLet's say it's all a futile misunderstanding on my part and move on from there.
hmmm...don't recall having addressed you, RatX, but I appreciate your input. I fail to see any accusation aimed at ivanhoe in the instance you offered. Perhaps you should reconsider 'wasting time to find the links', or stick to not playing chess.
23 Sep 05
Originally posted by ivanhoeFinally someone with a wise comment in the discussion.
Let's say it's all a futile misunderstanding on my part and move on from there.
I personally don't see why anyone would suspect at all that Ivanhoe and RatX could be the same person for Ivanhoe is a subscriber and has no use for a second account... Oh well, what does it matter anyway. Let's discuss something useful!
24 Sep 05
Originally posted by AstherealNo use for a second account? C'mon, use your imagination a bit.
Finally someone with a wise comment in the discussion.
I personally don't see why anyone would suspect at all that Ivanhoe and RatX could be the same person for Ivanhoe is a subscriber and has no use for a second account... Oh well, what does it matter anyway. Let's discuss something useful!