29 Aug 13
Originally posted by galveston75Why is it when someone says something you disagree with you have to be insulting e.g. "No clue huh?"
No clue huh? If I see it is a serious and honest question I'll answer you.
It is interesting that the jehovahs witnesses, you and robbie, are the only posters here (other than dasa) who claim to be the 'sole holders of truth' and yet you are also the most offensive.
29 Aug 13
1 edit
Originally posted by divegeesteractually i find you way more offensive than Galveston, just saying that your truth claim doesn't appear to be as truthful as you would like to think. Personally i find it not only offensive but arrogant that you think you are not only the herald of this truth claim but its originator as well, are you a source of truth? a judge of other peoples realities? what qualifies you to this position?
Why is it when someone says something you disagree with you have to be insulting e.g. "No clue huh?"
It is interesting that the jehovahs witnesses, you and robbie, are the only posters here (other than dasa) who claim to be the 'sole holders of truth' and yet you are also the most offensive.
29 Aug 13
Originally posted by robbie carrobieBlurting again. Please try to be more coherent.
actually i find you way more offensive than Galveston, just saying that your truth claim doesn't appear to be as truthful as you would like to think. Personally i find it not only offensive but arrogant that you think you are not only the herald of this truth claim but its originator as well, are you a source of truth? a judge of other peoples realities? what qualifies you to this position?
29 Aug 13
Originally posted by divegeesterWhat? RJ hasn't told you yet that your going to burn in hell if you don't agree with him? Lol.
I did consider putting RJHinds in with that comment but I don't recall him ever saying he was, or his view is, the only truth. As the Jehovah's Witnesses and dasa both do.