Doctrines and teachings not required for salvation

The trinity (capitalised or otherwise) (non biblical made up hokum anyway)
Hell and lakes of fire, brimstone, sulphur or any other apocalyptic occurrences
Being cast into said lakes
Burning alive in said lakes
Burning alive in said lakes for eternity
Miracles (no matter how lovely or helpful e.g. water into wine)
Floods and other mass extinction events
Genealogies
Garden of Eden
Deification of men
Deification of women
Numerology claims
The entire book of Revelation
Any other doctrine, teaching or assertion

Salvation is free and for everyone. It refers to not being extinct after death. This phenomena from the eternal dimension can be experienced in the temporal plane through faith in the finished work of Christ at Calvary. In terms of “salvation” everything else is, relatively speaking, theological scenery.

@divegeester said
The trinity (capitalised or otherwise) (non biblical made up hokum anyway)
Hell and lakes of fire, brimstone, sulphur or any other apocalyptic occurrences
Being cast into said lakes
Burning alive in said lakes
Burning alive in said lakes for eternity
Miracles (no matter how lovely or helpful e.g. water into wine)
Floods and other mass extinction events
Genealogie ...[text shortened]... st at Calvary. In terms of “salvation” everything else is, relatively speaking, theological scenery.

@divegeester said
The trinity (capitalised or otherwise) (non biblical made up hokum anyway)
Hell and lakes of fire, brimstone, sulphur or any other apocalyptic occurrences
Being cast into said lakes
Burning alive in said lakes
Burning alive in said lakes for eternity
Miracles (no matter how lovely or helpful e.g. water into wine)
Floods and other mass extinction events
Genealogie ...[text shortened]... st at Calvary. In terms of “salvation” everything else is, relatively speaking, theological scenery.

Right

@vedlateshdubariya said
Right

@josephw said
Opinions don't count.

Doctrine does.

@fmf said
Well, the thread is about doctrine. It would be interesting to hear you answer the OP's question.

@josephw said
Would you please find the question asked in the OP? I'm having some difficulty locating it.

@josephw said
When the assertions made in the OP are backed up by the scriptures I'll answer the question.

@fmf said
What doctrines and teachings are not required for salvation?

@josephw said
Better yet, which doctrines are?

@fmf said
Here they are again:

The trinity (capitalised or otherwise)
Hell and lakes of fire, brimstone, sulphur or any other apocalyptic occurrences
Being cast into said lakes
Burning alive in said lakes
Burning alive in said lakes for eternity
Miracles (no matter how lovely or helpful e.g. water into wine)
Floods and other mass extinction events
Genealogies
Garden of Eden
Dei ...[text shortened]... book of Revelation

Belief in which of these doctrines/teachings is not required for "salvation"?

@josephw said
No thanks.Pick one, provide scriptural references to support the assertion of the OP, and then we can discuss.

@divegeester

I read your thoughts on things pertinent and not to "salvation."
Could you give your thoughts on this?

When Romans 5:9 says " . . . we will be saved through Him from the wrath."

What does "the wrath" refer to there?

Divegeester,

I have another question I would like you to addressed as honestly as you can.

I have always perceived you as very concerned about the severity of not being saved - the baffling tragedy of it, the horrendous implications of being so unsaved.

Have you ever at any time thought that in so arguing against certain things I have presented to you, that in some cases you are working against your own concern for a more extensive divine mercy upon more people?

I mean it is I who have argued here, that at least Matt. 25:32-46 shows some people who did not know Christ being granted to enter into eternal life.

Has it ever come across your mind ? ie. "By arguing against sonship on some points I am actually shooting myself in the foot inadvertenly."