Don’t be an old wineskin

@divegeester said
Yes, really.
I don’t see how what you posted related to any part of the post you were replying to.
Maybe you could explain?

@kellyjay said
The old was the covenant OT law, the NT covenant of grace through faith in Christ. This is new to you?

@kellyjay said
The old was the covenant OT law, the NT covenant of grace through faith in Christ. This is new to you?

@divegeester said
Of course not, but how is it relevant to the post of mine which you were replying to?

@kellyjay said
If you have no idea what the difference between the OT and the NT covenants is, why are you even talking about scripture as if your point of view has anything to do with what scripture says on salvation?

@divegeester said
Why don’t you go back to the post you were replying to and make whatever point it is you are trying to make. Make it succinctly, clearly and with minimal church-speak.

Then I’ll gladly respond to it.

@kellyjay said
You ignore Scripture, so it doesn't matter what anyone says; you only take on those true things as you like them, and if you don't, you have a built-in excuse, church-speak, gobbly glue, fuzz balls, or whatever it is you say when you want to blow off something said to you without addressing the points themselves.

@divegeester said
Try responding without quoting scripture as Moonbus advised you. Give the OP some thoughts of your own instead of regurgitating stuff you’ve been taught.

@kellyjay

Would you like to discuss the theme of “not being an old wineskin”, or would like to continue to go against you own principle of not making posts personal?