25 Oct 12
Originally posted by robbie carrobieAnd why did Dasa give details of those rapes? In order to make his claim that all Muslims are rapists and pedophiles. Fellow posters [or at least those who could be bothered to engage him] tackled Dasa's assertion head on and did not deflect at all. The fact that Dasa was tackled for making such an outrageous and disgraceful claim about all Muslims, and that it was found to have been unacceptable according to the TOS, stands testimony to the degree of seriousness with which the crime of rape is perceived by posters here.
no the actual content was a series of accusations where Muslim paedophiles had
perpetrated crimes against a Christian minority and i personally wish it was still active
also, for it would demonstrate attempts made to deflect from the actual content.
25 Oct 12
Originally posted by FMFThe reason is because.....................
Dasa has only ever mentioned rapes carried out by Muslims and "has never proposed a genocide of all Christian men on the basis that some Christians are rapists.
There is no where on earth where a religion sytematically rapes women as a commonplace matter of their religious culture.
Rape is embedded in Islamic culture and the Islamic mind-set.
Rape is not embedded in Christian culture or Hindu culture or or Buddhist culture.
A Christian can rape but its not embedded in its religious doctrine.
A Muslim rapes and it IS embedded in its doctrine.
The Quran informs us to plunder the booty after we kill the non Muslims.
The booty is the gold and cattle and the women and the girls.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is what the Muslim soldiers did after arresting the peasant farmer........
They arrested the farmer for demonstrating [peacefully] and then they raped his wife in front of the family - and then they cut off the penis of the husband and forced the wife to eat it - then they bayoneted the wife in her vigina.
This story can be verified in the Documentary " Strange Birds in Paradise" aired on TV recently and it can be viewed online.
Sexual violence is epidemic in Islamic religious culture.
Islamic culture is Islam.
Islam means the religion of Islam.
FMF why do you defend the atrocities of Islam? [rhetorical question]
And why do you reject true religion.
25 Oct 12
Originally posted by robbie carrobieAnd yet you won't go through my responses to your four "examples" one by one. I don't think there's much mystery surrounding why you won't.
I have already stated that they may be valid arguments in themselves but that they
have a tendency to detract from or deflect from the actual content of the posts, these
are the types of excuses i was referring to when i made my now landmark statement!
25 Oct 12
Originally posted by FMFLook its pointless without the actual content to discuss what transpired, there is no
And why did Dasa give details of those rapes? In order to make his claim that all Muslims are rapists and pedophiles. Fellow posters [or at least those who could be bothered to engage him] tackled Dasa's assertion head on and did not deflect at all. The fact that Dasa was tackled for making such an outrageous and disgraceful claim about all Muslims, and that it ...[text shortened]... stimony to the degree of seriousness with which the crime of rape is perceived by posters here.
empirical evidence other than what one remembers, I cannot remember any comments
on the content of his actual post and i doubt there would have been much for as you
say dasa is not forthcoming but tends simply to dump information. Clearly i have
offended the sensibilities of the secular liberals and i am now ready to recant, what
would you like me to say?
25 Oct 12
Originally posted by robbie carrobieOh absolutely, regardless of the religious background of the aggressors or the victims, I'm sure we all agree on that. And yet you stand by your expectation of justification by your 'secular liberal friends'?
yes, but the instances that he provided, if legitimate were certainly valid instances of
atrocity, were they not?
25 Oct 12
Originally posted by avalanchethecatI am now ready to make a full public recantation of my statement, what would you like me to say?
Oh absolutely, regardless of the religious background of the aggressors or the victims, I'm sure we all agree on that. And yet you stand by your expectation of justification by your 'secular liberal friends'?
25 Oct 12
Originally posted by robbie carrobieIt's not a suppose, that's the reason no one replies to this threads, there is no point. He has demonstrated over and over that he is merely filled with hatred, not interested in dialogue, not interested in reasoning. I mean, the guy called for the genocide of all Muslim men?! Surely that is an indicator of his motivations?!
I suppose, but still, everyone deserves a chance, even Satan was allowed to enter in
the angelic hordes and give an account of himself.
25 Oct 12
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWhy won't you address my four responses to these, one by one?
1. they (the atrocities and those who committed them) are not representative of all
Muslims
2. Christians have committed similar atrocities,
3. What about the crusades
4. All religions commit similar atrocities,
25 Oct 12
Originally posted by Proper Knobyes but still, even Satan was given a voice.
It's not a suppose, that's the reason no one replies to this threads, there is no point. He has demonstrated over and over that he is merely filled with hatred, not interested in dialogue, not interested in reasoning. I mean, the guy called for the genocide of all Muslim men?! Surely that is an indicator of his motivations?!
25 Oct 12
Originally posted by robbie carrobieHe claimed that all Muslims were rapists and pedophiles. There were numerous comments addressing this claim. Didn't you read the thread?
no there was dozens of comments about his post, not its content, not that i can remember anyway.