The Apostasy of the Church
Now we request you, brethren, with regard to the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ and our gathering together to Him, that you not be quickly shaken from your composure or be disturbed either by a spirit or a message or a letter as if from us, to the effect that the day of the Lord has come. Let no one in any way deceive you, for it will not come unless the apostasy comes first, and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the son of destruction, who opposes and exalts himself above every so-called god or object of worship, so that he takes his seat in the temple of God, displaying himself as being God.
(2 Thessalonians 2:1-4 NASB)
Doug Batchelor - the truth about Pope Francis and the Jesuit Order
Originally posted by SuzianneI'm not asking "others" I'm asking KellyJay but he seems unable to respond to the question. KellyJay has made an assertion and I am asking him about that assertion, why do you feel it necessary to wade in fists swinging with abusive comments in a matter that is no concern of yours?
Just how many times will you asking this? Must you incessantly bother him and us interminably?
Others have answered this numerous times. Are you stubborn, or just dense?
Originally posted by divegeesterOthers have made the same assertion, but you're not all up in their faces, are you?
I'm not asking "others" I'm asking KellyJay but he seems unable to respond to the question. KellyJay has made an assertion and I am asking him about that assertion, why do you feel it necessary to wade in fists swinging with abusive comments in a matter that is no concern of yours?
Or does KJ appeal to you as the low-hanging fruit that is less likely to defend himself?
"fists swinging with abusive comments" ... Isn't that rather like a paper tiger?
Why do you jump all over people about not attacking others who hold beliefs similar to theirs, and yet you also whine about people defending people with similar beliefs to theirs? Does that sound consistent?
Originally posted by SuzianneUsing emotive metaphors such as "up in their faces", "low hanging fruit", "jumping all over people", are not accurate descriptions of me asking KellyJay a simple polite question to explain why he feels the antichrist will return in his lifetime. If I see others making the same claim I will ask them the same question and perhaps they will be more inclined to respond. I find posters like KellyJay, Grampy Bobby, Jospehw, RBHILL, and indeed yourself quite interesting.
Others have made the same assertion, but you're not all up in their faces, are you?
Or does KJ appeal to you as the low-hanging fruit that is less likely to defend himself?
"fists swinging with abusive comments" ... Isn't that rather like a paper tiger?
Why do you jump all over people about not attacking others who hold beliefs similar to theirs, ...[text shortened]... whine about people defending people with similar beliefs to theirs? Does that sound consistent?
Originally posted by divegeesterWhen a simple polite question is asked repeatedly ad nauseum, it ceases to be simple, or polite.
Using emotive metaphors such as "up in their faces", "low hanging fruit", "jumping all over people", are not accurate descriptions of me asking KellyJay a simple polite question to explain why he feels the antichrist will return in his lifetime. If I see others making the same claim I will ask them the same question and perhaps they will be more incline ...[text shortened]... ind posters like KellyJay, Grampy Bobby, Jospehw, RBHILL, and indeed yourself quite interesting.