Originally posted by @divegeesterYou know what? Never mind.
I'm not avoiding you I just don't respond to posts with multiple questions as the point gets lost and the questioner tends to respond to the answer that suits them. Ask me a question and I'll respond.
You harangue other posters here for pages and pages and even across multiple threads, but you come up with the lamest excuse EVER for not answering questions posed directly to you.
So go ahead, be a hypocrite. It's not my problem.
Originally posted by @suzianneI discuss all manner of topics with regular posters here, and there are often acute differences of opinion. I answer questions that are put to me. It's your prerogative if you want to ignore the content of these discussions and the reasons for disagreement and dismiss it all as mere 'haranguing' if you want to. So that's my answer to your question. Now, once again, do you harangue other posters here for pages and pages and even across multiple threads, and come up with excuses for not answering questions posed directly to you, as you have accused divegeester of?
Do you yourself ever do exactly this, FMF?
16 Oct 17
Originally posted by @kellyjayYou mean creationism? Like a young Earth?
There is no evidence that talks about how everything came into being from nothing, there
isn't anything in science that addresses that. What light of new science points to how it all
got here? Having another explanation because someone thinks they know what occurred
billions of years ago isn't exactly iron clad evidence, its more faith based since it ca ...[text shortened]... t would just be another story
someone else comes up with, that too would share the limitations.
The 'Age of Earth' thread in Science addresses many points concerning this.
16 Oct 17
Originally posted by @karoly-aczelYou have something to bring here about where everything came from?
You mean creationism? Like a young Earth?
The 'Age of Earth' thread in Science addresses many points concerning this.