Originally posted by RJHindsHow can he be a Christian if he is also an evolutionist?
Top atheist scientist converts to Christianity
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=04V5PA5h2j0
Or do you now accept his position on Genesis and creation?
You may remember that you and I discussed Dr Collins before...
πππ
Originally posted by RJHindsDr. Charles Jackson: "Now, I am not calling evolutionists stupid. I have not met a stupid evolutionist. These are smart people, often brilliant! But a smart person can believe a stupid thing, if they want it to be true..."
Junk DNA, Part 1 of 2 · Dr. Charles Jackson
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9U2JvXNupCk
The irony is beautiful given that he just before misrepresented vestigiality to mean organs that's lost all (instead of just part) of their function, so that he could demonstrate that those particular vestigial organs he pointed to, are not vestigial at all. Talk about using his smarts to maintain his wishful thinking. I find this hilarious. Are you creationists seriously listening to this guy? π΅
Originally posted by CalJustHe is a baby Christian now who has not shed all his evolution doctrination yet. He still needs more instructions in the truth. π
How can he be a Christian if he is also an evolutionist?
Or do you now accept his position on Genesis and creation?
You may remember that you and I discussed Dr Collins before...
πππ
Originally posted by C HessYou are not very scientific minded are you? Lets make it simple.
The ENCODE project reported in that very article that only 80% of our genome is biochemically active, leaving 20% junk. π
What the Encode project tells us about the human genome and 'junk DNA'
Junk DNA Myth Continues Its Demise
A large-scale international research effort, ENCODE (Encyclopedia of DNA Elements), began in 2003 as an outgrowth of the Human Genome Project. Although the human genome had been largely finished in its final draft form in 2004, very little was known about the functionality of the many areas outside the protein-coding regions that comprised less than 5 percent of the total DNA sequence. A large number of biologists considered this excess DNA to have little value, referring to it as “junk DNA.” However, many early studies in functional genomics contradicted this idea and showed that non-coding DNA played a significant role in gene regulation and genome function. The ENCODE project was initiated as a massive global research effort to map and characterize the functionality of the entire human genome.
So exactly what were the shocking findings? The research is difficult to condense because it appeared in 30 different research papers. Nevertheless, the scientists are still just only scratching the surface of the complexity of the human body and its genome. In fact, the current results were only derived from 147 cell types in the human body—the number of actual cell types in humans is well over 550.6 Here are a few of the recent findings:
• Over 80 percent of the human genome is actively involved in at least one or more biochemical reactions associated with gene regulation in at least one type of cell. Nearly all of the genome lies within close proximity to some sort of regulatory event and, therefore, very little of the genome can be considered extraneous to its full function.
• The human genome can be classified into seven different broadly categorized genetically active states that enhance gene expression, mapped to 399,124 different regions.
• Although the human genome may only contain ~21,000 genes, scientists found 70,292 areas called gene promoters that precede the protein-coding areas of genes. This finding confirms the idea that genes are like molecular Swiss army knives, providing a diversity of products and outcomes depending on how they are operated and controlled.
• Gene expression is controlled by a broad array of regulatory proteins, chemical marks in the DNA (epigenetic factors), gene promoter features (specific DNA sites), and enhancer sequences that are sometimes located thousands and millions of bases from a gene or set of genes. All of these features operate in concert with other genes and regulatory features in irreducibly complex and intricately coordinated networks.
• ENCODE-related genetic variation plays a large role in the observed variability among humans—perhaps more so than the variation observed within protein-coding regions. Many heritable human diseases are associated with variations or mutations in ENCODE regions and not in the actual protein-coding areas.
These incredible findings of ENCODE have made a huge impact in the genetics and biology world. Indeed, most of the popular news stories describing the research sound as if they were written by creationists and intelligent design authors—the press reports contain very little, if any, mention of evolution. However, high-profile evolutionists who have a limited knowledge of molecular genetics and the details of the Human Genome Project were offended by the wave of ENCODE news reports that flooded the popular media channels. The ENCODE press release messages, although written by evolutionists themselves, clearly came across as favorable for the amazing works of God the Creator in His creation, who declares in His Word that we are “fearfully and wonderfully made: marvellous are thy works” (Psalm 139:14).
http://www.icr.org/article/junk-dna-myth-continues-its-demise/
Originally posted by RJHindsYou posted the exact same content in debates, and I explained it for the last time there. You are the one lacking a scientific mindset, not me.
You are not very scientific minded are you? Lets make it simple.
[b]What the Encode project tells us about the human genome and 'junk DNA'
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UBQ5a7mCpMs
Junk DNA Myth Continues Its Demise
A large-scale international research effort, ENCODE (Encyclopedia of DNA Elements), began in 2003 as an outgrowth of ...[text shortened]... are thy works” (Psalm 139:14).
http://www.icr.org/article/junk-dna-myth-continues-its-demise/[/b]