12 Sep 15
Originally posted by FMFno i was not you were asking me to comment about a particular individual who made a confession here . shall i go back and retrieve your statement where you cite the person by name?
You were quite simply being asked if you condemned 'gay bashing' violence against homosexuals and NOT whether you were willing to condemn it "on the basis of little or scant knowledge".
12 Sep 15
Originally posted by robbie carrobieit has demonstrated the folly of your approach in that you are willing to induce others to make moral judgments about others on the basis of little or scant knowledge, a practice that in itself is morally contemptible and that the true course of wisdom is to refrain from making moral judgements about people until we have some facts, thats what it has accomplished but you seem so pompously puffed up that it has zinged right over your head, perhaps if you were a little less assuming and more eager to understand anothers perspective prior to making judgements about them you may do better.
You seem a bit rattled again.
12 Sep 15
Originally posted by FMFI will condemn it when i have all the facts it makes little difference who supplies the facts as long as they can be substantiated, this is the correct and proper approach.
If what redbadger claimed about himself was true would you condemn it? If he did indeed beat up homosexuals, is it a kind of violence you would be able to condemn?
Originally posted by FMFI guess it provides Robert with entertainment. That's the only conclusion I can come to. I just think he likes trying to wind people up, he's not interested in any semblance of sensible discussion.
I don't see how there's any humour in it though. Just pretending to not get the point, pretending not to have a moral objection to violence, just pretending that the mixture of sarcasm and Clan Forum style ad hominems is funny ~ or not being funny, or whatever? It seems peculiar. What does it achieve?
12 Sep 15
Originally posted by robbie carrobieIf what redbadger confessed to was true, would you condemn it?
no i was not you were asking me to comment about a particular individual who made a confession here . shall i go back and retrieve your statement where you cite the person by name?
12 Sep 15
Originally posted by FMFOn the conrart your silly attempts to induce other people to make judgement on the basis of having little or no facts is a sham that is why you are now ignoring the content of my post and in rather predictable fashion engaging in an ad hominem. Plastic, predictable and utterly unconvincing.
[b]it has demonstrated the folly of your approach in that you are willing to induce others to make moral judgments about others on the basis of little or scant knowledge, a practice that in itself is morally contemptible and that the true course of wisdom is to refrain from making moral judgements about people until we have some facts, thats what it has accompli ...[text shortened]... ve prior to making judgements about them you may do better.
You seem a bit rattled again.[/b]
12 Sep 15
Originally posted by Proper KnobBut what's the point of trying to wind me up. I don't get wound up. And I don't respond in kind when he tries to land his little ad hominem punches. Aren't there loads of like minded people he could actually wind up on the Clans Forum?
I guess it provides Robert with entertainment. That's the only conclusion I can come to. I just think he likes trying to wind people up, he's not interested in any semblance of sensible discussion.
12 Sep 15
Originally posted by Proper Knobanother silly ad homimen that has even less substance than what transpired before, why don't you make reference to the content of the posts rather than attempt to attack the personality behind it, who knows you may do better.
I guess it provides Robert with entertainment. That's the only conclusion I can come to. I just think he likes trying to wind people up, he's not interested in any semblance of sensible discussion.
12 Sep 15
Originally posted by robbie carrobieYou were never asked to condemn violence "on the basis of having little or no facts", you were asked if you condemned the violence when it happens and you could not bring yourself to do so until page 7.
On the conrart your silly attempts to induce other people to make judgement on the basis of having little or no facts is a sham that is why you are now ignoring the content of my post and in rather predictable fashion engaging in an ad hominem. Plastic, predictable and utterly unconvincing.
12 Sep 15
Originally posted by robbie carrobieAre you still being sarcastic now? Or serious?
another silly ad homimen that has even less substance than what transpired before, why don't you make reference to the content of the posts rather than attempt to attack the personality behind it, who knows you may do better.
Originally posted by FMFIf you have the facts then let them be heard. Tell us what you know about badgers alleged gay bashing.
You were never asked to condemn violence "on the basis of having little or no facts", you were asked if you condemned the violence when it happens and you could not bring yourself to do so until page 7.