The reason posts in the Spirituality forum get so convoluted is because there are a couple of people here who apparently think it's their job to confuse even the most carefully laid out arguments and eventually turn the whole thing into a personal argument. It's not the forum itself or the subject matter. It's the usual suspects, lying in wait, pouncing on any comments made by people they don't like.
Originally posted by @karoly-aczelThought I already gave it. Too many people around here with a chip on their shoulder trying to convince people what to believe.
Anyy thoughts on the OP?
No one cares who you think is worse here.
More people like me who simply stated an opinion or factual information from the Bible and this would be a much better place.
Of course if you are not a Christian then keep your nose out of Christian discussions as I avoid non Christian discussions.
Originally posted by @divegeesterThis is the fourth post by you, on page one, demanding to know how you fall into the same category as what you're bitching about. Most of your posts are you chasing down someone who had the GALL to call you out on your behavior. Your posting history shows plainly how you chase people from thread to thread after saying something YOU don't like. The latest victim of your 'call out and ruin' campaign is Romans. Of course he precipitated it by being stupid, but you were relentless, aided by the usual subjects and hangers-on until he left. You spend dozens of posts 'bumping' your call-outs, drawing even more attention to them. Mature people in this thread handle being 'naysayed' all the time, and apparently you use this as the green light for further attacks. You've chosen your allies well, people who are on this forum every day, posting reams more than most people, merely to back up your hatred of people who merely hold an opposite opinion from you.
So do I take it that you cannot find one single instance of me behaving in the manner described in my post that might help support your claim...???
Oh, wait, you said one SINGLE instance. My bad.
16 Jul 18
Originally posted by @suzianneFun watching chicks fight.
This is the fourth post by you, on page one, demanding to know how you fall into the same category as what you're bitching about. Most of your posts are you chasing down someone who had the GALL to call you out on your behavior. Your posting history shows plainly how you chase people from thread to thread after saying something YOU don't like. The lates ...[text shortened]... ho merely hold an opposite opinion from you.
Oh, wait, you said one SINGLE instance. My bad.
16 Jul 18
Originally posted by @suzianneYou seem overly upset with me about this; I suspect it’s because I don’t believe your made up life stories about angels visiting you, king fu on sex offenders in bars and flat mates jumping out of windows in the middle of the night.
This is the fourth post by you, on page one, demanding to know how you fall into the same category as what you're bitching about. Most of your posts are you chasing down someone who had the GALL to call you out on your behavior. Your posting history shows plainly how you chase people from thread to thread after saying something YOU don't like. The lates ...[text shortened]... ho merely hold an opposite opinion from you.
Oh, wait, you said one SINGLE instance. My bad.
You carry on though.
16 Jul 18
Originally posted by @eladarSo do I take it that you cannot find one single instance of me behaving in the manner described in my post that might help support your claim...???
Fun watching chicks fight.
16 Jul 18
Originally posted by @tom-wolseyThis is absolute nonsense and not a little sour grapes by you.
The reason posts in the Spirituality forum get so convoluted is because there are a couple of people here who apparently think it's their job to confuse even the most carefully laid out arguments and eventually turn the whole thing into a personal argument. It's not the forum itself or the subject matter. It's the usual suspects, lying in wait, pouncing on any comments made by people they don't like.
Originally posted by @divegeesterWas there something in what I said that you felt applied to you? Or are you saying there is absolutely no one here who would derail threads, obfuscate discussions, and make things personal? But since you took offense and apparently made it about you, let's see. In just your last few posts, you brought up Suzianne's past personal claims and threw them in her face... once again. And you once again brought up Eladar's alleged eating habits.
This is absolute nonsense and not a little sour grapes by you.
Is this where you say they deserved it, and remind us what horrible people they are?
I normally stay away from you since you did make a point of telling everyone you help run this website--which makes you particularly dangerous since that means you have personal information on the long, ever-growing list of users you hate.
16 Jul 18
Originally posted by @eladarYou seriously think that all my posts are opinions?
Thought I already gave it. Too many people around here with a chip on their shoulder trying to convince people what to believe.
More people like me who simply stated an opinion or factual information from the Bible and this would be a much better place.
Of course if you are not a Christian then keep your nose out of Christian discussions as I avoid non Christian discussions.
I'll say it again : You get respect when you give respect . Doesn't matter how good your doctrine is if you cant work out the most basic things in life.
17 Jul 18
Originally posted by @tom-wolseyDo not be willfully stupid, tom. You should bow down to zeus, and start to feel better.
The reason posts in the Spirituality forum ...
17 Jul 18
Originally posted by @divegeesterI have already pointed out your m.o.
So do I take it that you cannot find one single instance of me behaving in the manner described in my post that might help support your claim...???
You are doing it again lol
17 Jul 18
2 edits
Originally posted by @tom-wolseyYou’re either/or in your first sentence has nothing to do with the content of the post of yours which I was reply to and is therefore a stawman.
Was there something in what I said that you felt applied to you? Or are you saying there is absolutely no one here who would derail threads, obfuscate discussions, and make things personal?
My relply was made in response to the content of your other post; what you are doing here is trying to affix my reply to your last post to new content in this one, that is dishonest Tom.