06 Jun 17
Originally posted by apathistWe don't need to keep spewing carbon emissions into the atmosphere.
Do you think we broke it?
Speaking of which, what happened to the whole 'ozone hole' thing?
We also shouldn't need to farm so much meat that the cattle damage the atmosphere.
We have renewable, clean ways to live. Why persist in tempting fate?
06 Jun 17
Originally posted by sonshipI'm not a 'fad' guy.
[b] I really don't see old books as being a primary source of information. Sorry.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Which is probably why you'll ever be a dupe chasing after the latest fad.
No sorry to me. Your loss.[/b]
I respect Hindu/Buddhist way of looking at life. Like you didn't know ...
- Joined
- 03 Jan 13
- Moves
- 13080
Originally posted by karoly aczelNo "old books" in Hinduism ?
I'm not a 'fad' guy.
I respect Hindu/Buddhist way of looking at life. Like you didn't know ...
Right, no "old books" in Hinduism.
From Wiki - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanskrit
Sanskrit is a standardised dialect of Old Indo-Aryan, having originated in the 2nd millennium BCE as Vedic Sanskrit and tracing its linguistic ancestry back to Proto-Indo-Iranian and Proto-Indo-European.[9] As one of the oldest Indo-European languages for which substantial written documentation exists, ...
I really don't see old books as being a primary source of information. Sorry.
Hmmm.
07 Jun 17
Originally posted by sonshipI'm a Hindu. I take my own senses as a primary source of information, and books and other people's testimony (and such) as a secondary source.
No "old books" in Hinduism ?
Right, no "old books" in Hinduism.
From Wiki - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanskrit
Sanskrit is a standardised dialect of Old Indo-Aryan, having originated in the 2nd millennium BCE as Vedic Sanskrit and tracing its linguistic ancestry back to Proto-Indo-Iranian and Proto-Indo-European.[9] As one of the ol ...[text shortened]... I really don't see old books as being a primary source of information. Sorry.
Hmmm.
Hmmmmm.
08 Jun 17
1 edit
Originally posted by apathistNo. No I don't.
Do you think we are too late? I feel like a coward for dying before my great-grandkids get a shot. I'm worried we broke everything.
I genuinely think that cleaning up our businesses - effectively and rigorously - will preserve our planet enough for future generations (and future technologies) , to stabilize the atmosphere.
However if we let the political pressure slip, and put this on the backburner then all sorts of other negative influences can disrupt this process ( 'clean' coal comes to mind )
I am also a proponent of nuclear in the short-mid term. A form of energy or government don't want to use for some reason.
10 Jun 17
Originally posted by sonshipSpirituality, not Christianity.Mind you you have an unnerving knack to try to change this thread into another Christian one.
Try it on the Science Forum.
These threads gravitate to matters touching [b]Spirituality.[/b]
Every thread you participate in gravitates towards Christianity.
This is a spiritual concern not a scientific one. The science is already there.