Go back
god is real prove me wrong (atheist beware)

god is real prove me wrong (atheist beware)

Spirituality

X
Cancerous Bus Crash

p^2.sin(phi)

Joined
06 Sep 04
Moves
25076
Clock
15 Feb 06
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by dj2becker
Will you prove that the premises used to calculate the age of skeleton are 100% accurate?
Do you have a background in science extending past which pretty liquid you shouldn't drink?

dj2becker

Joined
01 Oct 04
Moves
12095
Clock
15 Feb 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by XanthosNZ
Do you have a background in science extending past which pretty liquid you shouldn't drink?
Strawman😞

s
Kichigai!

Osaka

Joined
27 Apr 05
Moves
8592
Clock
15 Feb 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by dj2becker
Will you prove that the premises used to calculate the age of skeleton are 100% accurate?
they don't need to be. They could be 20, heck, 10-fold out, and the world still wouldn't be 10,000 years old only.

But, I'll do it tomorrow. Got an experiment I gotta take care of (at midnight ) 😞

X
Cancerous Bus Crash

p^2.sin(phi)

Joined
06 Sep 04
Moves
25076
Clock
15 Feb 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by dj2becker
Strawman😞
I'm just wondering where I should be pitching an explanation. I can't just write an all-encompassing explanation as it would take forever. So, undergraduate university classes in physics and chem? More? Less?

twhitehead

Cape Town

Joined
14 Apr 05
Moves
52945
Clock
15 Feb 06
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by dj2becker
Will you prove that the premises used to calculate the age of skeleton are 100% accurate?
I do not need to proove anything. The statement made origionally was:

BTW, there's never been an archeological dig that contradicts a story in the Bible.

In my opinion there are many archeological digs which fall into this category.
He did not state:

Every archeological dig that appears to contradict the Bible can be shown to be false or flawed."

It is also my opinion that a large proportion of the fields of geology, astronomy, biology and physics contradict stories in the Bible. If you disagree with the findings in these fields that does not take away the contradiction.

By your statement you imply that nothing can contradict the Bible unless it is shown to be 100% acurate. By the way what does 100% accurate mean anyway?
[edit]
for example take a statement like: the Bible does not contradict the Quoran unless you can show that the Bible is 100% accurate

cg

Seattle

Joined
30 Jan 06
Moves
26370
Clock
15 Feb 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by JesusFreak2562000
atheist beware god is real prove me wrong
Lets just stop the thread here...obviously Freak thought he had some type of silver bullet that could take athiests down, and as you guys have clearly shown he doesnt.

a

Meddling with things

Joined
04 Aug 04
Moves
58590
Clock
17 Feb 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by JesusFreak2562000
atheist beware god is real prove me wrong
Can you punctuate this please, then we might know what you're driving at.

N

The sky

Joined
05 Apr 05
Moves
10385
Clock
18 Feb 06
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by aardvarkhome
Can you punctuate this please, then we might know what you're driving at.
Atheist - beware, god! - is real. Prove me wrong!

fogwalker

Joined
08 Jan 06
Moves
11173
Clock
18 Feb 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

hey will everitt how are you? .you are right friend,you do have the ability to know right from wrong as do we all,because GOD gave us all a consceince,the word consceince means with knowledge..So when we do something weather it is right or wrong we do it with knowledge.for instance if one tells a lie no matter what kind of lie or how many lies they told.they done so knowing it was wrong,therefore they are a lier.Or if one takes something that does dont belong to them regardless of its value,they done so with knowledge,therefore this makes them a thief.now if one kills another they are a murderer or if one hates another this is consider murder in GOD's eyes( 1John3:15).now these are just 3 of the 10 of GOD's laws his comandments,just like in today's society when we break a law we will suffer the consequences,but GOd's laws are more strict.so if you have broken any of the laws above & dont know GOD u are in trouble.with this consceince,you have the ability to choose right or wrong. >>>(will be continued)

C

Joined
05 May 05
Moves
12897
Clock
18 Feb 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by JesusFreak2562000
atheist beware god is real prove me wrong
further proof that religion and rationality cannot coexist

H
I stink, ergo I am

On the rebound

Joined
14 Jul 05
Moves
4464
Clock
18 Feb 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Cog
further proof that religion and rationality cannot coexist
Secundum quid.

s

Joined
23 Sep 05
Moves
11774
Clock
18 Feb 06
2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Halitose
Secundum quid.
I wish I knew what all those fancy latin phrases you throw around you actually mean. Then I might be able to join in on the discussion. 😳

What? I have to study at some university for ten years before I can communicate with you? πŸ˜ πŸ˜•

Not fair. πŸ™

[edit:]

Secundum quid
According to?..
or, "in accordance with"?..
What?..

[edit:]

aaaaah, according to Cog... yes?..
So Cog says that religion is illogical (or something like that) and you say: "According to you" to him.

Ok, never mind. I'll just be quiet now. πŸ™‚

H
I stink, ergo I am

On the rebound

Joined
14 Jul 05
Moves
4464
Clock
18 Feb 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by stocken
I wish I knew what all those fancy latin phrases you throw around you actually mean. Then I might be able to join in on the discussion. 😳

What? I have to study at some university for ten years before I can communicate with you? πŸ˜ πŸ˜•

Not fair. πŸ™

[edit:]

Secundum quid
According to?..
or, "in accordance with"?..
What?..

[edit:]

aaaaah, ac ...[text shortened]... hat) and you say: "According to you" to him.

Ok, never mind. I'll just be quiet now. πŸ™‚
Secundum quid is the abbreviated version of the latin phrase: a dicto secundum quid ad dictum simpliciter. Roughly translated it means, "where an acceptable exception is eliminated or simplified".

Cog commited the logical fallacy of hasty generalisation.*

*http://www.logicalfallacies.info/hastygeneralisation.html

s

Joined
23 Sep 05
Moves
11774
Clock
18 Feb 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Halitose
Secundum quid is the abbreviated version of the latin phrase: a dicto secundum quid ad dictum simpliciter. Roughly translated it means, "where an acceptable exception is eliminated or simplified".

Cog commited the logical fallacy of hasty generalisation.*

*http://www.logicalfallacies.info/hastygeneralisation.html
Great link there. Thanks. πŸ™‚

Halitose is a good, good man. πŸ˜€

- Therefore all men are good.

H
I stink, ergo I am

On the rebound

Joined
14 Jul 05
Moves
4464
Clock
18 Feb 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by stocken
Great link there. Thanks. πŸ™‚

Halitose is a good, good man. πŸ˜€

- Therefore all men are good.
You got it -- case in point.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.