Originally posted by galveston75I am going to take that personally. I offered to take up your challenge, and you have decided to ignore me. Proper Knob has offered to take up the challenge by means of a book.
As usual here comes the attacks like clock work. This to me is absolute proof that you nor any other of the evolutionist can never back up you evolution theories.
So you are lying when you say 'nor any other of the evolutionist' and I expect an apology.
Whats worse is you acknowledge that you think the contents of the book are convincing else why would you say about reading it:
I already know it's not for me and good for my future and my relationship with God
Originally posted by twhiteheadThe book has already been reviewed as bad science and a piece of bias junk.
I am going to take that personally. I offered to take up your challenge, and you have decided to ignore me. Proper Knob has offered to take up the challenge by means of a book.
So you are lying when you say 'nor any other of the evolutionist' and I expect an apology.
Whats worse is you acknowledge that you think the contents of the book are convincing ...[text shortened]... uote] I already know it's not for me and good for my future and my relationship with God[/quote]
The Instructor
Originally posted by galveston75Do you even know what a proof is!? Really, what on Earth makes you think that a rigorous demonstration of evolution's facticity can be distilled into one page - to be understood by half-wits no less!???
Ok. Please direct me to a specific book, chapter and page that NOW has the absolute proof that one "kind" of animal has indeed changed to another "kind" that I can see with my own eyes.
Lol. Again no cheating though. No words like "we think" or "we suppose" or "maybe" or "it could have", etc ,etc, can be in the description of this new proof. Deal?
...[text shortened]... en hint that your evolution is indeed real. Never, ever!!!!!!
I'll be waiting as usual......
Why don't you, just for extra fun, further impose the constraint that any such proof must reference a pogo stick? 😞