Go back
Hebrew God Equals Sumerian God

Hebrew God Equals Sumerian God

Spirituality

V

Windsor, Ontario

Joined
10 Jun 11
Moves
3829
Clock
28 Jun 12

Originally posted by RJHinds
You are so convinced of your own wisdom that it is useless to present any truth to you to dispel such ignorance. 🙄
that's just another way of saying "you win"

thanks, i accept your surrender.

RJHinds
The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
Clock
29 Jun 12

Originally posted by VoidSpirit
that's just another way of saying "you win"

thanks, i accept your surrender.
Me no surrender! Me takum scalp! 😏

galveston75
Texasman

San Antonio Texas

Joined
19 Jul 08
Moves
78892
Clock
29 Jun 12
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Suzianne
You may try to present the Hebrews as being polytheistic all you want. Certainly don't let any facts get in your way.

Of course the Hebrews were monotheistic. This is documented all the way back to Abraham, and certainly by the time of Moses (you could see this in Exodus and the first commandment of the Ten Commandments). This was long before the Babylonian exile.
RJH might agree they worshipped 1 God then but he has a problem trying to explain that all of a sudden they started to believe he is a three being God even though there is not one mention of them changing to that belief in the Bible. That belief did not become doctrine until the Council of Nicaea.

googlefudge

Joined
31 May 06
Moves
1795
Clock
29 Jun 12
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by galveston75
RJH might agree they worshipped 1 God then but he has a problem trying to explain that all of a sudden they started to believe he is a three being God even though there is not one mention of them changing to that belief in the Bible. That belief did not become doctrine until the Council of Nicaea.
This is one of the few times I can agree with a JW.

The bible read literally really does not support the idea of JC also being god or god being a three
part being.

And this was a controversy in early Christianity that was arbitrarily decided at the Council of Nicaea.

However reading the bible literally also declares that slavery is fine and that unmarried women who
are raped should be made to marry the rapist...

So lets hear it for non-literal readings of the bible... Otherwise known as just making s**t up.

RJHinds
The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
Clock
30 Jun 12
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by googlefudge
This is one of the few times I can agree with a JW.

The bible read literally really does not support the idea of JC also being god or god being a three
part being.

And this was a controversy in early Christianity that was arbitrarily decided at the Council of Nicaea.

However reading the bible literally also declares that slavery is fine and th ...[text shortened]... So lets hear it for non-literal readings of the bible... Otherwise known as just making s**t up.
You and the JWs are wrong in your understanding of the Trinity. The word "persons" has many more meanings today than it had when the Doctrine of the Trinity was agreed upon as the truth about the nature of God. Three persons did not mean three beings to the Christians back then. The three persons of the Trinity are of one being.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trinitarianism

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.