"Hell shaming" & "No eternal Son"

In Divegeester we have a particular case of teaching a temporary Son of God.
I take no delight in misrepresenting a teaching.
I think I am being accurate that Divegeester teaches that the "office" of the Son of God will be done away forever after the millennial kingdom.

Objections to this are met with outline summaries that Dive puts forth teaching of God being one, which is not the point. I think he reads into First Corinthians 15:24-28 that the Son of God position goes away. It doesn't say that the Son of God is no longer, no more, made obselete, superceded, obliterated, or downsized away.

" . . . then the Son Himself also will be subjected to Him who has subjected all things to Him, that God may be all in all." (v.28) says nothing about there is no more Son of God.

To Dive it seems that a trinatarian is not allowed to believe there is one God and that the Son of God is eternal.

When was the Son NOT subject to the Father that God is all in all?

@sonship said
In 2022 AD a false teacher can be deceived by a doctrine of demons.

@sonship said
@divegeester
In 2022 AD a false teacher can be deceived by a doctrine of demons.

@divegeester


I understand that.
For sure you get a whole lot more enthusiastic high fives from atheists than I do.

The irony, for a supposed true teacher of the New Testament Gospel?

@sonship said
@divegeester
I understand that.
For sure you get a whole lot more enthusiastic high fives from atheists than I do.
The irony, for a supposed true teacher of the New Testament Gospel?

@divegeester

I am "on about" there is the eternal Son.

And I am "on about" the words of dreadful warning of the fate of not being saved came from the mouth of Jesus. And there is no need for the Christians to be ashamed of what He is or spoke.

This thread is mainly "on about" if there is a relationship between shaming Christians for believing Christ's words and wanting the office of the Son of God to be temporary.

@sonship said
@divegeester

I am "on about" there is the eternal Son.

And I am "on about" the words of dreadful warning of the fate of not being saved came from the mouth of Jesus. And there is no need for the Christians to be ashamed of what He is or spoke.

This thread is mainly "on about" if there is a relationship between shaming Christians for believing Christ's words and wanting the office of the Son of God to be temporary.

@divegeester

You said I get “high fives from atheists”

Divegeester,

Now if eternity will know nothing of a "Son of God" (as if the office has been blotted out and cut off forever) does that for you suggest disbelief and rejection of the Son of God is not any significant offense?

@sonship said
@divegeester

You said I get “high fives from atheists”

That's right - what I would say are enthusiatic "high fives."

@sonship said
Divegeester,
Now if eternity will know nothing of a "Son of God" (as if the office has been blotted out and cut off forever) does that for you suggest disbelief and rejection of the Son of God is not any significant offense?

@divegeester
Nice imagery.
You should take a creative writing class.

@sonship said
That's right - what I would say are enthusiatic "high fives." I don't think I alone have noticed.Like the eching of concepts you get from atheist FMF, - nods of agreement. That is nods of agreement about there being no triune God and "god figures" like Jesus Christ are not that seriously to be taken. It is "scare tactic" to imagine rejection of the Son and His work is a serio ...[text shortened]... ying in essence over the years "You go Divegeester! Go get em. Go after the Bible tumpers. "

@sonship said
@divegeester
Nice imagery.
You should take a creative writing class.