07 Jul 10
Originally posted by robbie carrobieRob, calling someone a jock or a taff isn't the same as calling someone a paki or a coon, a wog, etc etc.
no i would not call you a racist, shes from Pakistan, what else would you call her? its a very short difference from Pakistani to Paki, no biggie. i am from Scotland, i get called a jock, is that racist? i dont think so, it makes no difference to me.
i once got spat on by a minibus full of Geordies when i was riding past in my bike on Gt wester ...[text shortened]... ult and was reprehensible, he should not pick fights with people and expect to remain unscathed.
07 Jul 10
2 edits
Originally posted by Proper Knobsure i agree with you, its not the same. rather amusingly, Pakistanis have a rather cheeky word for us, they call us Ghora, meaning whitey! kind of like the Asian equivalent of honkey, cracker etc etc.
Rob, calling someone a jock or a taff isn't the same as calling someone a paki or a coon, a wog, etc etc.
07 Jul 10
Originally posted by robbie carrobiePrecisly.
their whole argument rests upon, non existent scientific evidence. they state that homosexuals cannot help being homosexual, therefore, it is wrong to criticise them for being so. what they have in fact done, is very subtly used a non existent piece of data and used it to support a moral stance. When you try to question it morally, they make an ob ...[text shortened]... reasoning this society is.
Plus, the fact is that Germany lost, which makes it even worse!
The same thing goes for every other argument the unbeliever makes. They believe a lie, so therefore the truth must be a lie.
07 Jul 10
Originally posted by Proper KnobThread 131770
When the scientific evidence is found that homosexuality is formed in our genes i will laugh my ass off. Why did God create gays, only to then condemn them to death?
07 Jul 10
Originally posted by robbie carrobieThread 131770
you are failing to see the distinction, if you say anything against me, my religion, if you put a sign on your door saying no Jehovahs Witnesses, that is fine, you are free and it is your prerogative, can i do the same in my guest house? can i what, i shall be reported to the police and may face prosecution, its a double standard and its hypocrisy.
...[text shortened]... you are very well aware and none will ever be found, it therefore remains a matter of morality.
07 Jul 10
5 edits
Originally posted by avalanchethecatI have no proof. That's the story I've been exposed to mostly; he's a Welshman (well, Briton technically) who maintains order after the Romans leave, only to fall to the Angles and other Germanic tribes. Whether Arthur was an individual or a symbol of Celtic resistance I don't know. If my statement wasn't fact then it was poetic license.
While I wouldn't argue about the age of the English nation (well, I might suggest that it's nearer 1300 years old), I am curious as to your source for the existence of a 'King Arthur Pendragon'. You're not swallowing Geoffrey of Monmouth's story are you?
I understand he may have been contemporary with Saint Patrick!
EDIT - I tend to go roughly by the historical novels The Camulod Chronicles by "Jack Whyte" actually, but I am in no way willing to argue that Arthur was an actual historical figure.
07 Jul 10
Originally posted by robbie carrobieIs this supposed to be some kind of joke? This is about "Hindu society", not "Hinduism proper". Are you not able to make that distinction? Perhaps an example will help. "Santa Claus" is considered a part of "Christian society", though few if any would consider it part of "Christianity proper".
In the context of traditional Hindu society, Dalit status has often been historically associated with occupations regarded as [b]ritually impure, such as any involving leatherwork, butchering, or removal of rubbish, animal carcases, and waste. Dalits work as manual labourers cleaning streets, latrines, and sewers. Engaging in these activities wa ...[text shortened]... ocate of bigotry, racism, segregation and injustice now? you aught to be ashamed of yourself.[/b]
So once again you still have posted no evidence that it is definitely part of Hinduism proper. None, zero, nada.
You also have not posted any reasonable refutation of the evidence that it is not a part of Hinduism proper.
Quite frankly, I don't think you can do either and so you instead continue your dancing around it.
07 Jul 10
Originally posted by karoly aczelWhether homosexuality is genetic or otherwise doesn't really matter now does it.
Whether homosexuality is genetic or otherwise doesn't really matter now does it.
Who cares what consenting adults do in thier own homes? (apparently robbie does😕 )
Who cares if they have gay pride marches?
What possible harm can they do? Honestly?
Not to those who don't care to know the truth. Obviously.
07 Jul 10
Originally posted by robbie carrobieOnce again you said:
why would i provide evidence, my conscience has already accused me, i need not justify it to anyone else. indeed i could have denied the charge, you have no evidence, but i chose, on the basis of my conscience, not to.
" i am merely providing evidence against the accusation that i am a bigot"
Are you really so dim that you are incapable of having even a half-way intelligent discussion?
07 Jul 10
Originally posted by karoly aczeli could not care less, if you actually read the thread before making such a statement you would realise that i have refused on numerous occasions to give my personal opinion, your attempts to state otherwise are the reflections of a slaphead and a doughball! get a grip.
Whether homosexuality is genetic or otherwise doesn't really matter now does it.
Who cares what consenting adults do in thier own homes? (apparently robbie does😕 )
Who cares if they have gay pride marches?
What possible harm can they do? Honestly?
07 Jul 10
Originally posted by ThinkOfOneyes but not with a thread hijacker like you!
Once again you said:
" [b]i am merely providing evidence against the accusation that i am a bigot"
Are you really so dim that you are incapable of having even a half-way intelligent discussion?[/b]
07 Jul 10
1 edit
Originally posted by josephwexactly, they want everyone to be like them, think like them, adopt the same morality as them, they preach individual freedom and exist as slaves of corruption, biggest bunch of hypocrites ever.
[b]Whether homosexuality is genetic or otherwise doesn't really matter now does it.
Not to those who don't care to know the truth. Obviously.[/b]
07 Jul 10
Originally posted by josephwI think there are numerous posts in several threads clearly explainig that there is no such thing as 'the truth' .
[b]Whether homosexuality is genetic or otherwise doesn't really matter now does it.
Not to those who don't care to know the truth. Obviously.[/b]
Unless you believe the bible hook,line and sinker and dismiss all other evidence to the contrary. Then there might be this truth you speak of . Of course this will just be "God" being merciful to the ignorant who have good heart but wrong thinking.
In short your are delusional but we all are to some extent. To think otherwise (ie.that you are not delusional and every other person that disagrees with you is), is VERY delusional.