Originally posted by AgergLol, I am sure Caissa shall confirm it, there is a difference from what a chick wants and what she is prepared to settle for, you hang in their my friend, bring home the bacon and a chick shall find you 🙂
Fair enough...your mindset is probably configured such that it be receptive to suggestions of magic and supernatural things.
As for me they didn't dig skinny b**tards!..15 years on they don't dig bald, skinny b**tards!!! :]
Originally posted by robbie carrobieSure. I want everyone to have food in their bellies and a roof over their heads as well robbie so why not just have the government take care of it all?
the problem of course for you dear whodey is that i dont have a history of beating anyone up, least of all my wife, now can the same be said of nominal Christianity? can it?
Secondly i want to ask you why you as a Christian why have you opposed universal healthcare for all Americans, don't you want the children to have good health, beautiful teet ...[text shortened]... Please tell me what is Christian about not wanting to help others in this way, if you please.
If you had not noticed, nanny states across the world are in out of control debt with a world wide financial system built on a house of cards. If the government were not hanging by such a precarious thread I would be more inclined to support their nanny state proposals. After all, how many people are going to have health coverage if the government goes bellly up? In fact, we see in France as the government pretty much controls everything they are now reeling back the retirement age with people rioting in the streets. Mark my words, the quality of entitlements will gradually wane once the public surrenders control over their lives to Big Brother.
Of course, the virus you suffer from is statism. It is a trust in government for all our needs. As we both know, this is idolotry.
Originally posted by tacoandlettuceAh jeez...I can't be such a dick as to let you carry on and waste your money. that ain't my skype number! (you were meant to spot a pattern in the numbers and take the hint!)
This will possibly be tomorrow if I have the panhandle'n money to afford being able to skype with you, and we will work it out then, k? =p
Originally posted by whodeycorrect me if i am wrong but America has the largest external national debt of any economy and yet is still unable to provide basic health care to its citizens, but more than that, many are opposed to providing basic health care to its citizens on the basis that its uneconomic to do so, i assert that it is unchristian to do so, for did not the good Samaritan provide health care to the man who was beaten up by the robbers at cost to himself. I think it is utter hypocrisy to term oneself a Christian and then withhold basic necessities from persons on the basis of economics, nor does your answer give any clear indications as to why it should be withheld, after all, your perfectly content to spend quadrillions on armaments , but oppose basic health care for your very own citizens? and on what basis? i reject your claims for i am apolitical, have never voted nor ever will, but i understand that it is a prime objective of government to provide and maintain basic necessities, like roads, schools and education, clean water etc and as for the precarious nature of the financial system it was created by greedy capitalists, not by government.
Sure. I want everyone to have food in their bellies and a roof over their heads as well robbie so why not just have the government take care of it all?
If you had not noticed, nanny states across the world are in out of control debt with a world wide financial system built on a house of cards. If the government were not hanging by such a precarious threa ...[text shortened]... is statism. It is a trust in government for all our needs. As we both know, this is idolotry.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieRob, you are that rare combination, a left-wing fundamentalist Christian.
correct me if i am wrong but America has the largest external national debt of any economy and yet is still unable to provide basic health care to its citizens, but more than that, many are opposed to providing basic health care to its citizens on the basis that its uneconomic to do so, i assert that it is unchristian to do so, for did not the good S ...[text shortened]... ecarious nature of the financial system it was created by greedy capitalists, not by government.
I'm a little embarrased to say this, but it almost turns me on.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieAfter this post, I find you less evil.
correct me if i am wrong but America has the largest external national debt of any economy and yet is still unable to provide basic health care to its citizens, but more than that, many are opposed to providing basic health care to its citizens on the basis that its uneconomic to do so, i assert that it is unchristian to do so, for did not the good S ...[text shortened]... ecarious nature of the financial system it was created by greedy capitalists, not by government.
Originally posted by bbarrsteady on gentlemen one is not used to being described in such glowing terms as , 'less evil', forgive me if i squint my eyes while contemplating the implications, but i really did try hard to understand how a professed Christian could be opposed to such a measure, it just seems, well. . . unchristian, yes i understand the historical perspective that Americans have always resented interference from government, but Geroge the IV is dead and he isn't going to sail up the Hudson any time soon.
After this post, I find you less evil.
Originally posted by Proper Knobah if only you were a six foot four women with munga babylons we could talk of our egalitarian sensibilities all night 😉
Rob, you are that rare combination, a left-wing fundamentalist Christian.
I'm a little embarrased to say this, but it almost turns me on.