- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
13 Nov 17
Originally posted by @fmfIf morality is only individual as you say and your own morals only apply to you, it means you have no right to make moral judgements on Hitler or the God of the Bible, but yet you do.
You already know what I think about this and about what happens when people disagree about morals. We have talked about it explicitly. You are asking me about it again anyway. You are trolling.
13 Nov 17
Originally posted by @dj2beckerThis is a complete, deliberate and rather cretinous mischaracterization of what I have explained and argued very clearly in the past. I have no need to repeat myself. I am not jumping through your trolling adolescent hoops.
If morality is only individual as you say and your own morals only apply to you, it means you have no right to make moral judgements on Hitler or the God of the Bible, but yet you do.
- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
13 Nov 17
Originally posted by @fmf"We can only speak for ourselves as individuals and take personal responsibility for how we interact with other people. That's what morality is all about. It's personal. It's subjective. It varies."
This is a complete, deliberate and rather cretinous mischaracterization of what I have explained and argued very clearly in the past. I have no need to repeat myself. I am not jumping through your trolling adolescent hoops.
These are your words FMF.
13 Nov 17
Originally posted by @dj2beckerYes and what about the thousands and thousands of other words I also wrote on this subject? Didn't you read any of them? Go and troll somebody else.
"We can only speak for ourselves as individuals and take personal responsibility for how we interact with other people. That's what morality is all about. It's personal. It's subjective. It varies."
These are your words FMF.
- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
13 Nov 17
Originally posted by @fmfIf morality is purely subjective as you say then all the thousands and thousands of words you have written about morality would be equivalent to you trying to defend your stance that the color blue is prettier than the color pink. No much use really to anyone.
Yes and what about the thousands and thousands of other words I also wrote on this subject? Didn't you read any of them? Go and troll somebody else.
13 Nov 17
Originally posted by @dj2beckerI am no longer interested in your trolling.
If morality is purely subjective as you say then all the thousands and thousands of words you have written about morality would be equivalent to you trying to defend your stance that the color blue is prettier than the color pink. No much use really to anyone.
13 Nov 17
Originally posted by @dj2beckerIf you believe that the chronic dysfunction in our conversations has been caused by my immaturity, then so be it. If I discern some improvement in your behaviour, I will resume discussing things with you.
Play the troll card whenever your arguments crumble. Very mature indeed.
- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
13 Nov 17
Originally posted by @fmfWhat you don't seem to get into your head is the fact that if morals are purely subjective there is no universally correct answer to a moral question. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. Asking the question "Is it better to be selfless than selfish?" would be equivalent to asking "Is the color pink better than the color blue?" There is no correct answer. Ponder upon that, maybe it will sink in eventually.
If you believe that the chronic dysfunction in our conversations has been caused by my immaturity, then so be it. If I discern some improvement in your behaviour, I will resume discussing things with you.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerWhat you don't seem to get into your head is the actual meaning or content of anything I have said in any of my contributions to our 'conversations'.
What you don't seem to get into your head is the fact that if morals are purely subjective there is no universally correct answer to a moral question. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. Asking the question "Is it better to be selfless than selfish?" would be equivalent to asking "Is the color pink better than the color blue?" There is no correct answer. Ponder upon that, maybe it will sink in eventually.
13 Nov 17
Originally posted by @dj2beckerYou're missing the part where you are supposed to talk to me as if you'd read my posts instead of asking the same questions over and over and over again as if you haven't.
What 'actual meaning' have I not gotten into my head? I understand your stance. What am I missing?
- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
13 Nov 17
Originally posted by @fmfYou might prefer the color blue someone else might prefer green. Someone else might prefer the death sentence you might not. Big deal when it’s all subjective.
You're missing the part where you are supposed to talk to me as if you'd read my posts instead of asking the same questions over and over and over again as if you haven't.
13 Nov 17
Originally posted by @dj2beckerColours are not morals. Colours would only perhaps be analogous to morals in the mind of a child or a person with some kind of intellectual disability who has never thought about morality.
You might prefer the color blue someone else might prefer green. Someone else might prefer the death sentence you might not. Big deal when it’s all subjective.