Originally posted by divegeesterI remember Robbie Carrobie holding up the argument that lying is always wrong in one of my threads a while ago - yet here he is, deliberately trying to suggest that he did not alert the moderators when it is clear he did (or said he did!).
But you claimed you did!!
Your deceitfulness is shameful; what would your JW leaders think if they could see this?
Ah well!
14 Dec 12
Originally posted by AgergMore scandalous skullduggery from the FMF school for scoundrels, suggesting Agers?
I remember Robbie Carrobie holding up the argument that lying is always wrong in one of my threads a while ago - yet here he is, deliberately trying to suggest that he did not alert the moderators when it is clear he did (or said he did!).
Ah well!
could you be more specific and produce the reference where i have stated that i have
alerted the moderators in this regard? divegeester is hardly to be trusted, he posts
doctored texts from articles that he has not even read, gleaned from the third part hate
sites that he frequents, a thoroughly disreputable cad and bounder if ever there was
one, but if you play near muck the likely hood is that you will end up mucky yourself.
14 Dec 12
Originally posted by deennywhy are you asking me, perhaps you think i am telepathic? have a secret mind ray
As I said we will await the verdict. Interested you fell that Gal75 was uncomfordable answering the questions. Why!!!
hidden high in the hills with which i am able to extract the Gmans thoughts, perhaps the
gman felt that they were merely contentious and it was thus futile to answer them, FMF
tends to produces questions which are designed to foment contention, its was trolls do.
14 Dec 12
Originally posted by robbie carrobieAs you claim to have FMF on ignore you may not have seen his response that you stated you had alerted the moderators on the 3rd post from the bottom at:
More scandalous skullduggery from the FMF school for scoundrels, suggesting Agers?
could you be more specific and produce the reference where i have stated that i have
alerted the moderators in this regard? divegeester is hardly to be trusted, he posts
doctored texts from articles that he has not even read, gleaned from the third part hate
s ...[text shortened]... ere was
one, but if you play near muck the likely hood is that you will end up mucky yourself.
http://www.redhotchess.com/board/showthread.php?threadid=150006&page=10
14 Dec 12
1 edit
Originally posted by Agergalerting his posts with regard to harassment is not alerting them with regard to the
As you claim to have FMF on ignore you may not have seen his response that you stated you had alerted the moderators on the 3rd post from the bottom at:
http://www.redhotchess.com/board/showthread.php?threadid=150006&page=10
private text which I thought you were making reference to. I have alerted his posts for
harassment, but not in relation to any private text that the Gman sent, you really
should be more specific when you are mud slinging, or perhaps as a graduate from the
school of scoundrels such ambiguity suits your skullduggery.
yes i do not see FMFs texts, i simply get a rather glorious thick line.
14 Dec 12
Originally posted by robbie carrobieAnyone who challenges you or your misbegotten cult seem to be classified by you as "haters" or "slime" or some other random term of abuse from the robbie carrobie compendium of cheap ad hominem.
More scandalous skullduggery from the FMF school for scoundrels, suggesting Agers?
could you be more specific and produce the reference where i have stated that i have
alerted the moderators in this regard? divegeester is hardly to be trusted, he posts
doctored texts from articles that he has not even read, gleaned from the third part hate
s ...[text shortened]... ere was
one, but if you play near muck the likely hood is that you will end up mucky yourself.
14 Dec 12
Originally posted by robbie carrobieDo you think you'd feel the same way about this soap opera if if was instead played out in the clan only forum, with shortcircuit playing the role of Galveston and someone from IVV playing the role of FMF?
alerting his posts with regard to harassment is not alerting them with regard to the
private text which I thought you were making reference to. I have alerted his posts for
harassment, but not in relation to any private text that the Gman sent, you really
should be more specific when you are mud slinging, or perhaps as a graduate from the
sch ...[text shortened]... ts your skullduggery.
yes i do not see FMFs texts, i simply get a rather glorious thick line.
14 Dec 12
2 edits
Originally posted by robbie carrobieGiven that it was me saying:
alerting his posts with regard to harassment is not alerting them with regard to the
private text which I thought you were making reference to. I have alerted his posts for
harassment, but not in relation to any private text that the Gman sent, you really
should be more specific when you are mud slinging, or perhaps as a graduate from the
sch ...[text shortened]... ts your skullduggery.
yes i do not see FMFs texts, i simply get a rather glorious thick line.
I don't doubt for a moment that either of Galveston75, or Robbie Carrobie have sent an alert to the moderators; the thing is, much to their embarrassment and annoyance, they have most likely been ignored. Furthermore, I do doubt Galveston75 has shown the moderators the actual PM he sent you (he is feeble, but not *that* feeble!).
which prompted your:
why would i send an alert to the moderators? i am not the one being harassed.
with no caveat that you were referring only to the redistribution of a PM to other members via PM, and that you instead specifically refer to harassment, your response here doesn't stand. You knew full well you were making a deceptive statement. You are trying to be deceptive here also.
14 Dec 12
Originally posted by robbie carrobieIt was you who suggested that he was uncomfordable answering the questions. This is a prime example of what we are talking about. You make a statement that makes no sense and when you are asked about it , you go off on one. The question is. Why do you think Gal 75 is uncomfordable answering questions(your assessment, not mine)
why are you asking me, perhaps you think i am telepathic? have a secret mind ray
hidden high in the hills with which i am able to extract the Gmans thoughts, perhaps the
gman felt that they were merely contentious and it was thus futile to answer them, FMF
tends to produces questions which are designed to foment contention, its was trolls do.
14 Dec 12
1 edit
Originally posted by deennyyes i suggested because as i tried to make clear to you i have no real way of knowing
It was you who suggested that he was uncomfordable answering the questions. This is a prime example of what we are talking about. You make a statement that makes no sense and when you are asked about it , you go off on one. The question is. Why do you think Gal 75 is uncomfordable answering questions(your assessment, not mine)
although it was perfectly clear to me in private correspondence with the Gman that he
finds FMF contentious and that is the reason i gave, DO YOU UNDERSTAND, HE FINDS
FMF MERELY CONTENTIOUS now may i offer another suggestion FMF, errrr i mean
deenny that you accept that reason, suck it up and stop being such a pestilent fellow,
there's a good chap.
14 Dec 12
2 edits
Originally posted by Agerglook i have made my position clear, I alerted the moderator with regard to FMFs
Given that it was me saying:
[quote]I don't doubt for a moment that either of Galveston75, or Robbie Carrobie have sent an alert to the moderators; the thing is, much to their embarrassment and annoyance, they have most likely been ignored. Furthermore, I do doubt Galveston75 has shown the moderators the actual PM he sent you (he is feeble, but not *that* new full well you were making a deceptive statement. You are trying to be deceptive here also.
harassment, i have not alerted them with regard to the private text , believe what you
want, its makes absolutely no difference to me, vile and slimy insinuations are water
from a ducks back.
14 Dec 12
Originally posted by robbie carrobieHaving been made aware of the post where you said you had alerted the moderator with regards to what you think is harassment on the part of FMF, I am not disputing "[you] alerted the moderator with regard to FMFs [supposed] harassment". I am disputing that you were honest when you implied you didn't send such an alert via your earlier response:
look i have made my position clear, I alerted the moderator with regard to FMFs
harassment, i have not alerted them with regard to the private text , believe what you
want, its makes absolutely no difference to me.
"why would i send an alert to the moderators? i am not the one being harassed."
My last post details why I feel justified to dispute your honesty.