14 Oct 22
@fmf saidDo the Gospels state that he was "murdered"?
The Romans killed Jesus as a perceived political threat. Do the Gospels state that he was "murdered"?
"What's the difference between being killed and murdered?
Answer: If you murder somebody, your intention would be solely to kill them. If your intent wasn't to kill them but you do, then it is not considered murder. Murder is a killing where the intent is proved."
@fmf saidNot contemporaneous "records", no. It's not.
Not contemporaneous "records", no. It's not. Even the New Testament was written decades after the events supposedly happened and the writer of most of it never even met its main protagonist.
Yes it is. Flavius Josephus is one of the Roman Jewish historian's at that time. Go do some studying on him. He wrote all about Jesus and the happening's in Jewish culture at that time; even tho he didn't believe in Jesus. 🙂
and the writer of most of it never even met its main protagonist.
Completely wrong again. Many of the scribes knew the main protagonist; especially John.
@fmf saidAnd I know
I am not talking about how his execution is "described". And I know how you and other Christians characterize what happened to Jesus but if he was "murdered" then, of course, the gospels would state that he was "murdered".
How do you know? Do you have proof? 🙂
The Gospels do state that Jesus was murdered; ALL of them.
@fmf saidAzrajeio bariku! Halam zalaam.
"I know there is no God".
Actually, I do not "know" it. And I never make this claim.
We can certainly say we believe supernatural beings exist or don't exist.
Or... that we do not or cannot know either way.
We can also certainly say we believe that a specific God figure from a specific religious tradition exists or that we don't believe that a specific God figure, ...[text shortened]... belief.
This is a dilution of the meaning of the word "know" that does not benefit the discourse.
14 Oct 22
@divegeester saidWhat do you want, little boy? A cookie with frosting? Some melba toast with butter?
Why is there a space between Lyons and Spakowski?
15 Oct 22
@kingdavid403 saidThe Romans executed him for sedition, i.e. they perceived him as a political threat - as even indicated by your own words - so the reason he ended up dead was because of an execution and not a murder.
Do the Gospels state that he was "murdered"?
"What's the difference between being killed and murdered?
Answer: If you murder somebody, your intention would be solely to kill them. If your intent wasn't to kill them but you do, then it is not considered murder. Murder is a killing where the intent is proved."
15 Oct 22
@kingdavid403 saidJosephus did not produce "contemporaneous records". He was writing two or three generations after Jesus's death. You apparently to reassess your understanding of what the word "contemporaneous" means.
Not contemporaneous "records", no. It's not.
Yes it is. Flavius Josephus is one of the Roman Jewish historian's at that time. Go do some studying on him. He wrote all about Jesus and the happening's in Jewish culture at that time; even tho he didn't believe in Jesus.
15 Oct 22
@kingdavid403 saidThe Bible describes an execution. It does not use the word "murder", which it surely would have done if that was what happened.
In the Bible. In every Gospel as I told you several times before little boy. Grow the fck up.
@fmf saidlol, Yes he did. Grow up little atheist boy. You really showing what an actual loser you are.
Josephus did not produce "contemporaneous records". He was writing two or three generations after Jesus's death. You apparently to reassess your understanding of what the word "contemporaneous" means.
15 Oct 22
@kingdavid403 saidThe main writer was Paul. He never even met Jesus.
and the writer of most of it never even met its main protagonist.
Completely wrong again. Many of the scribes knew the main protagonist; especially John.