31 May 12
1 edit
Originally posted by RJHindsYou have obviously completely lost the thread of the conversation.
Evolution will not work even if you were able to give it an infinite amount of time. 😏 HalleluYah !!! Praise the Lord!
He said “Its simply a matter of time” in the context of him showing me evidence for his claim.
31 May 12
Originally posted by robbie carrobieThat's lovely, but where's the 'empirical data' to back up your claim that airborne pollutants are filtered by ocean vents?
check this out,
Second, their data also includes some interesting discrepancies that point to a strong
biological influence on the chemistry of the water coming out of the lower-temperature
vents. The concentrations of hydrogen gas were 50 percent to 80 percent lower than
chemically predicted, indicating that something must be using it up. ...[text shortened]... roduct of
design, but nah, it just must of happened. Is that rational? logical? reasonable?
31 May 12
1 edit
Originally posted by Proper KnobI am trying to source them and when i do, Humy will be sowy. Actually dear PK as I
That's lovely, but where's the 'empirical data' to back up your claim that airborne pollutants are filtered by ocean vents?
have stated i read it in a book given to me by a geologist, obviously he wanted his
book back so i do not have that publication and its rather difficult to find a site which
details the specific process, lots of sites about hydrothermal vents but none linking what
happens to pollutants in water as they pass through these vents, never the less I will
continue to try and once I am vindicated i will pile up Humys doubts of my great theory
up and crow upon the seething mass like a cockerel in the morning.
31 May 12
Originally posted by robbie carrobie
I am trying to source them and when i do, Humy will be sowy. Actually dear PK as I
have stated i read it in a book given to me by a geologist, obviously he wanted his
book back so i do not have that publication and its rather difficult to find a site which
details the specific process, lots of sites about hydrothermal vents but none linking wh ...[text shortened]... s doubts of my great theory
up and crow upon the seething mass like a cockerel in the morning.
I am trying to source them and when i do, Humy will be soWy (my emphasis)
LOL. Yes, I would be “sowy “.
31 May 12
Originally posted by wolfgang59You have to be the biggest idiot of all to believe that. The Holy Bible is so unique even you (not blindfolded) could not match it in eons of time. It is considered to have within its pages the greatest story ever told. The following websites gives a professors description of how unique it is:
Don't be ridiculous ... given an infinite amount of time a roomful of blindfilded RJHinds could recreate the bible .. Hallelujah
http://www.angelfire.com/sc3/myredeemer/Evidencep3.html
Professor M. Montiero-Williams, former Boden professor of Sanskrit, spent 42 years studying Eastern books and said in comparing them with the Bible:
"Pile them, if you will, on the left side of your study table; but place your own Holy Bible on the right side - all by itself, all alone - and with a wide gap between them. For,...there is a gulf between it and the so-called sacred books of the East which severs the one from the other utterly, hopelessly, and forever...a veritable gulf which cannot be bridged over by any science of religious thought."
31 May 12
Originally posted by RJHindsIt might be the best book ever written but all that proves is the writers were very creative, does not prove divine inspiration.
You have to be the biggest idiot of all to believe that. The Holy Bible is so unique even you (not blindfolded) could not match it in eons of time. It is considered to have within its pages the greatest story ever told. The following websites gives a professors description of how unique it is:
http://www.angelfire.com/sc3/myredeemer/Evidencep3.html
...[text shortened]... ever...a veritable gulf which cannot be bridged over by any science of religious thought."[/b]
01 Jun 12
3 edits
Originally posted by RJHinds-which doesn't answer my question.
I said, "You can either believe it or not."
"You can either believe it or not" logically applies to ALL beliefs if one was to exclude the “don't know / not sure” options so you are not explaining a lot here!