If the flood happened, why are the oceans salty?

Originally posted by humy
which post are you referring to?

Your post just above mine.

Originally posted by RJHinds
Didn't I inform you that Dr. Hugh Ross is a false teacher. But I said even he sees evidence of fulfilled prophecies in the Holy Bible. Where did I endorse his interpretations? But the prophecies are there for you to see and there are accurate interpretations available. If you refuse to look for them, then this is all I can say for you...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OlBifX0H3yg&feature=related

If you hate him, that automatically makes him my friend.

Originally posted by RJHinds
Your post just above mine.

so your criticism here is that I am "trying to speed read" my OWN post and I am "not very good at it"?
What is your objection to me “speed reading” my own post?
And why would you think I am “speed reading” it whatever that is supposed to mean?


I had said:

I don't refuse to look at the link. I have just seen the link. It is just a video giving a boring song about the “blinding light”.
What the hell is that to do with evidence of fulfilled prophecies in the Holy Bible? 😛
How the hell does that song represent “the prophecies” that “are there for you to see” and with “accurate interpretations available”? 😛
Perhaps you can show me something that is at least vaguely RELEVANT?

and not only do you not answer my two questions above but you do NOT give me something vaguely relevant but just talk about “speed reading” instead 😛

Originally posted by sonhouse
If you hate him, that automatically makes him my friend.

I am not hating anyone. I just disagree with some people and do not like what they are doing.

Originally posted by humy
so your criticism here is that I am "trying to speed read" my OWN post and I am "not very good at it"?
What is your objection to me “speed reading” my own post?
And why would you think I am “speed reading” it whatever that is supposed to mean?


I had said:

[quote] I don't refuse to look at the link. I have just seen the link. It is just a video giving ...[text shortened]... ou do NOT give me something vaguely relevant but just talk about “speed reading” instead 😛

Now be honest. You know what I mean. You can't be that stupid.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
actually my original assertion was taken from a book lent to me by a geologist. I am
not in possession of that book anymore, never the less, he confirmed the fact. I have
posted in oceanography forums asking for any references which will confirm the
details, for example,

http://www.topix.com/forum/science/oceanography

when i get a reply, you'll be the first to know.

when i get a reply, you'll be the first to know.

Really?! You didn't post this -

I am a qualified atmospheric scientists and also a Professor in geology including ocean-floor geology.
I can tell you with absolute certainty that, whatever you exactly mean by airborne 'pollutants', no airborne 'pollutant' of the specific types that combine with sea-salt aerosols from ocean spray and which eventually reach the ocean floor are ever 'filtered' through hydrothermal vents in any significant quantity compared to were most of it goes for such a type of 'pollutant' would consist of heavier particles than mere gas particles and such particles that reach the sea floor would generally just settle on the bottom and come part of the sediment that can eventually change into sedimentary rock.

Originally posted by Proper Knob
[b]when i get a reply, you'll be the first to know.

Really?! You didn't post this -

I am a qualified atmospheric scientists and also a Professor in geology including ocean-floor geology.
I can tell you with absolute certainty that, whatever you exactly mean by airborne 'pollutants', no airborne 'pollutant' of the specific types that com nd come part of the sediment that can eventually change into sedimentary rock.

[/b]

No i did not post that, some professor in Port Talbot did, what I meant is when i get a
response which confirms my theory, you'll be the first to know. Tell me PK, what do
you think will happen to pollutants that are subjected to the pressure and heat (400
Celsius) of hydrothermal vents?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
No i did not post that, some professor in Port Talbot did, what I meant is when i get a
response which confirms my theory, you'll be the first to know. Tell me PK, what do
you think will happen to pollutants that are subjected to the pressure and heat (400
Celsius) of hydrothermal vents?

I see.

As for your question, i don't know and i don't care. It's your theory, we wait for you empirical evidence.

Originally posted by Proper Knob
I see.

As for your question, i don't know and i don't care. It's your theory, we wait for you empirical evidence.

you dont care? ouch, arrow to the heart or what? when i am collecting my Nobel prize
for science, then you will be forced to acknowledge my special theory of hydrothermal
vents.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
you dont care? ouch, arrow to the heart or what? when i am collecting my Nobel prize
for science, then you will be forced to acknowledge my special theory of hydrothermal
vents.

Well there is nothing contained on the internet to back up your theory, and you have now had a professor of ocean floor geology tell you he/she knows of no such system. I think we mat be waiting a long time for your 'fandango theory' to be acknowledged.

Originally posted by Proper Knob
Well there is nothing contained on the internet to back up your theory, and you have now had a professor of ocean floor geology tell you he/she knows of no such system. I think we mat be waiting a long time for your 'fandango theory' to be acknowledged.

On the contrary i have found evidence that magnesium gets filtered by some elements
in the sedimentary rocks, all I need to do is get the Proff to admit that pollutants would
be vitrified and i am vindicated! Fandango theory? sigh its lamentable that great theories
like Einsteins and mine are condemned to obscurity when first published by an
unappreciative public.

the fact of the matter is dear PK, the ocean filters pollutants, even airborne pollutants.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
On the contrary i have found evidence that magnesium gets filtered by some elements
in the sedimentary rocks, all I need to do is get the Proff to admit that pollutants would
be vitrified and i am vindicated! Fandango theory? sigh its lamentable that great theories
like Einsteins and mine are condemned to obscurity when first published by an
unappreciative public.

Wow, I did not know you are on a par with Einstein.

Originally posted by sonhouse
Wow, I did not know you are on a par with Einstein.

Only in the respect that we are both original thinkers, his field was physics, mine is
conceptual art.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
On the contrary i have found evidence that magnesium gets filtered by some elements
in the sedimentary rocks, all I need to do is get the Proff to admit that pollutants would
be vitrified and i am vindicated! Fandango theory? sigh its lamentable that great theories
like Einsteins and mine are condemned to obscurity when first published by an ...[text shortened]... c.

the fact of the matter is dear PK, the ocean filters pollutants, even airborne pollutants.

its lamentable that great theories like Einsteins and mine are condemned to obscurity

Taxi for Mr Carrobie!!!!

Originally posted by Proper Knob
[b]its lamentable that great theories like Einsteins and mine are condemned to obscurity

Taxi for Mr Carrobie!!!![/b]

LOL 🙂