Originally posted by kirksey957I had second thoughts last night.
Do you think it would be OK to rape someone in the family of a rapist if they raped someone in your family?
In O.T. times they killed of the whole family when some guy stole something out of Jaraco or however you spell it. So if a man rapes someone I say kill him. But not his family. For an eye for an eye.
Originally posted by RBHILLWhy not just chop off the offending body part? That would be the literal interpretation, I'd think. Why let him die? Make him live forever with what he did, but incapable of repeating the crime.
I had second thoughts last night.
In O.T. times they killed of the whole family when some guy stole something out of Jaraco or however you spell it. So if a man rapes someone I say kill him. But not his family. For an eye for an eye.
(Jericho)
Originally posted by reader1107But that would cause phycological problems. And he might still take revenge on that womans family if he had the chance.
Why not just chop off the offending body part? That would be the literal interpretation, I'd think. Why let him die? Make him live forever with what he did, but incapable of repeating the crime.
(Jericho)
Originally posted by reader1107That hardly prevents a repeat. Artificial equipment works in lieu of the real thing. (This is pretty much the standard rebuttal to this argument - "It's all about power"...)
Why not just chop off the offending body part? That would be the literal interpretation, I'd think. Why let him die? Make him live forever with what he did, but incapable of repeating the crime.
(Jericho)