- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29602
09 Mar 22
@sonship saidYou have a monopoly on mad and wreckless diatribes.
@PB1022
Rajk999?
I don't read him anymore, unless it was an accident.
But yes indeed. It is sad.
Sad is the word.
I am thankful for any orayer for me.
And though I don't read his mad and wreckless diatribes anymore, he can be prayed for.
- Joined
- 03 Jan 13
- Moves
- 13080
@Ghost-of-a-Duke
Tit for tate minimal few, are too cheap to follow all day with replies.
Its only a good tactic for wearing out someone's time and energy.
Not much more.
I'll check in occasionally for some more thoughtful substance posts from
someone.
Dribble is the opposite of waffle.
Like little dripping faucet not fully turned off or on.
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29602
09 Mar 22
@sonship saidYou have not fared well today in these forums, at times regressing to some primitive state.
@Ghost-of-a-Duke
Tit for tate minimal few, are too cheap to follow all day with replies.
Its only a good tactic for wearing out someone's time and energy.
Not much more.
I'll check in occasionally for some more thoughtful substance posts from
someone.
Triffile is the opposite of waffle.
Like little dripping faucet not fully turned off or on.
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29602
09 Mar 22
@sonship saidYes, that is the state I was referring to.
@Ghost-of-a-Duke
Dribble.
'Dribble' is synonymous with:
God-Ized
We-Ized
Mingling
Deification
- Joined
- 03 Jan 13
- Moves
- 13080
@Ghost-of-a-Duke
Dribble is symonomous for empty nothings you live for clueless about why you're here.
The funny thing is you didn't choose anything if your naturalism is right.
You're just phissing molecules up there determining what you "believe."
No credit to you for choosing. what's right or wrong.
You're just phissing.
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29602
09 Mar 22
@sonship saidAre these posts you'll be deleting in the morning?
@Ghost-of-a-Duke
Dribble is symonomous for empty nothings you live for clueless about why you're here.
The funny thing is you didn't choose anything if your naturalism is right.
You're just phissing molecules up there deterniming what you believe.
No credit to you for choosing.
09 Mar 22
@ghost-of-a-duke saidWhat was missed in my question in your opinion because I believe I answered it.
Still you can't address the question. Why bother to post anything?
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29602
09 Mar 22
@kellyjay saidIs God's eternal plan for humans to be deified?
What was missed in my question in your opinion because I believe I answered it.
Yes or no.
09 Mar 22
@sonship saidAnother lie from King Liar. You read every word I write, because my posts are short, to the point and hard hitting. Also prayers from the mouth of the Devil and his Angel's are worthless
@PB1022
Rajk999?
I don't read him anymore, unless it was an accident.
But yes indeed. It is sad.
Sad is the word.
I am thankful for any orayer for me.
And though I don't read his mad and wreckless diatribes anymore, he can be prayed for.
09 Mar 22
@ghost-of-a-duke saidSo why isn't that accepted as an answer when I said yes on page 11?
Is God's eternal plan for humans to be deified?
Yes or no.
@kellyjay saidThe question is
Did you bother to read page 11 after I said I answered it there, before running your mouth?
Is God's eternal plan for humans to be deified?
Yes or no.
Your answer is
I believe I already answered this looking back at this thread. If I understand sonship, I agree in principle that God enters our lives literally as we are adopted into the Kingdom of God. So I guess you can put me in the yes column if you have questions; feel free to ask; there is no need to get insulting.
You answered the wrong question. You deceitfully changed the question to one of whether or not God enters our lives and said YES to that.
FMF did not understand what you were saying YES to either.
Do you really not understand the question?