26 Feb 14
Originally posted by FabianFnasI only instruct morons because I am ...
Please, don't call me ignorant, don't say that I have false beliefs, don't disrespect me.
Because if you do, I cannot respect you.
I ask you because I want to know. For me it is a paradox. If it is not for you, then you can explain it. If you cannot, then it is a paradox for you too. And then you are as ignorant as you say I am.
I turned to you, be ...[text shortened]... would know, and I respect your knowledge. You are after all the instructor, right? So I ask you.
The Moron Instructor
26 Feb 14
1 edit
Originally posted by RJHindsI only instruct morons because I am ... a moron, yes, you've already said so.
I only instruct morons because I am ...
The Moron Instructor
But if you are a moron, why do you think that you earn the respect to instruct? For me it is a waste of time.
Would you turn to a moron to be instructed? Of course not, not if you are serious.
26 Feb 14
Originally posted by FabianFnasNo one is forcing you to take instructions from ...
[b]I only instruct morons because I am ... a moron, yes, you've already said so.
But if you are a moron, why do you think that you earn the respect to instruct? For me it is a waste of time.
Would you turn to a moron to be instructed? Of course not, not if you are serious.[/b]
The Moron Instructor
26 Feb 14
Originally posted by RJHindsI don't take instructions from any moron, but I thought you were joking about that. Can I ever take you seriously?
No one is forcing you to take instructions from ...
The Moron Instructor
Can anyone take you seriously? About dinosaurs, 6000 years, cooling down the moon with water, the flooding, and all,
26 Feb 14
Originally posted by FabianFnasEven when I am serious, it does not mean I am right. However, I believe I am right when I give my serious opinion. I thought most people can tell when I am not serious on something. However, if anyone doubts, then all they have to do is ask and I tell them what I really believe even if it might seem stupid to them.
I don't take instructions from any moron, but I thought you were joking about that. Can I ever take you seriously?
Can anyone take you seriously? About dinosaurs, 6000 years, cooling down the moon with water, the flooding, and all,
26 Feb 14
Originally posted by RJHinds... then all they have to do is ask and I tell them what I really believe even if it might seem stupid to them.
Even when I am serious, it does not mean I am right. However, I believe I am right when I give my serious opinion. I thought most people can tell when I am not serious on something. However, if anyone doubts, then all they have to do is ask and I tell them what I really believe even if it might seem stupid to them.
Then I ask you the same question again. Just tell me that it seems bizarre for you to, and I go find anyone else who in fact can answer the question. That way you can keep some respect.
26 Feb 14
Originally posted by FabianFnasI forgot the question.
[b]... then all they have to do is ask and I tell them what I really believe even if it might seem stupid to them.
Then I ask you the same question again. Just tell me that it seems bizarre for you to, and I go find anyone else who in fact can answer the question. That way you can keep some respect.[/b]
26 Feb 14
Originally posted by FabianFnasChrist lives in the believer. So there's no need to live in the holy land.
So for short: The Jews were wrong, and the Christians were right?
Or put in another way: The chosen people of God was wrong, and the we, the other ones, were/are right?
So if the Jews is wrong in a such important question, who are they to live in the holy land and not the Christians, who, in fact, is right?
What is your personal explanation to this?
26 Feb 14
Originally posted by RBHILLThat's holy crap to me. You're just avoiding the question.
Christ lives in the believer. So there's no need to live in the holy land.
Try again. Read my questions and try to figure it out where the paradox is, and then try to figure it out how to resolve the question.
Why have a people as His pet people if they dismiss His only son, giving his life for the sin of the world. And the pet people doesn't care?
The Christians care, but cannot be His pet people anyway, because that position is already occupied. By people who even believe that His one son is something special.
Remember that even Muhammad himself recognized Jesus as one of the greatest prophet there was.
RJH couldn't answer satisfactory. Can you?
26 Feb 14
Originally posted by FabianFnasYou do not want to hear the truth. That is why the answer is not satisfactory to you. I believe you are another one like the Pharisee.
That's holy crap to me. You're just avoiding the question.
Try again. Read my questions and try to figure it out where the paradox is, and then try to figure it out how to resolve the question.
Why have a people as His pet people if they dismiss His only son, giving his life for the sin of the world. And the pet people doesn't care?
The Christians ...[text shortened]... ed Jesus as one of the greatest prophet there was.
RJH couldn't answer satisfactory. Can you?
27 Feb 14
Originally posted by RJHindsWho define truth? You? Me?
You do not want to hear the truth. That is why the answer is not satisfactory to you. I believe you are another one like the Pharisee.
I would like to hear your truth, but you don't have the Ultimate Truth. Noone has. The one who thinks he has the Ultimate Truth is not even near the Ultimate Truth, that we can hold for a truth.
I've posed my question. Noone has answered it in a (for me) satisfactory way. I'm still waiting. How can this paradox be resolved. Until I get a good answer that I can understand, whichever it is, it is still a mystery for me.