Originally posted by twhiteheadI believe the sequence was first drugs, then religion, and only after certain religions (Judaism, Christianity, Islam) developed monotheism (the seeds of all human alienation--see Peter L. Burger, The Sacred Canopy--did atheism develop. Indeed, one reason for refusing the self-label of atheist stems from recognition that its origins are mired in opposition to, and therefore logical dependance upon monotheistic religion.
Are you saying that there have been times when there were no athiests? Or that drug use only started when religions did?
Originally posted by ChurlantThe essence of hippie is a matter of behavior and values, not appearance.
This look like a hippy to anyone?
See Thread 44385
Originally posted by WulebgrActually atheism is not a religion but rather the abscence of religion and cannot 'develop'. Atheism is more a case of not believing in a God than specifically rejecting the belief. Before religion therefore everyone was athiest.
I believe the sequence was first drugs, then religion, and only after certain religions (Judaism, Christianity, Islam) developed monotheism (the seeds of all human alienation--see Peter L. Burger, The Sacred Canopy--did atheism develop. Indeed, one reason for refusing the self-label of atheist stems from recognition that its origins are mired in opposition to, and therefore logical dependance upon monotheistic religion.