Originally posted by LemonJelloYou and Froggy seem to make a great pair 2. π
the tag team of dj2 and halitosis strikes again.
if, as a weak atheist, i merely observe and point out that the theist has utterly failed in his case for god, how is that stance 'religious in nature'? if i believe in the big bang a ...[text shortened]... nfer that your definition of 'religious' is likewise ridiculous.
Definition no 4 of religion directly from the Oxford Concise Dictionary:
A cause, principle, or activity pursued with zeal or conscientious devotion.
I'd say you qualify perfectly.
Originally posted by HalitoseYa gotta remember sis, that it's the religious people that are making the claims of "knowing" about the begining, and that came from the stoneage.At least the Sumerian version did, Moses didn't "borrow" it until the bronze and by then the Akkadians had it.
Great goosestep. In rugby that would have been a certain try.
Originally posted by Halitosestill you guys are wrong about science and equally wrong about religion ,, you have the highest level of wrongness in existence.
You and Froggy seem to make a great pair 2. π
Definition no 4 of religion directly from the Oxford Concise Dictionary:
A cause, principle, or activity pursued with zeal or conscientious devotion.
I'd say you qualify perfectly.
Originally posted by frogstompI find it hard to debate with you sis, because you blame me for claiming to "know" everything, while you are doing the exact same thing in your sweeping statements about the epistemology of my belief. πππ²π΅π΄π
Ya gotta remember sis, that it's the religious people that are making the claims of "knowing" about the begining, and that came from the stoneage.At least the Sumerian version did, Moses didn't "borrow" it until the bronze and by then the Akkadians had it.
Originally posted by Halitoselol. still lol.
You and Froggy seem to make a great pair 2. π
Definition no 4 of religion directly from the Oxford Concise Dictionary:
A cause, principle, or activity pursued with zeal or conscientious devotion.
I'd say you qualify perfectly.
I'd say you qualify perfectly.
you clearly missed the memo that i am also agnostic. if only one person is zealous around here, it ain't me. the only thing i would say i am zealous about is the fact that you (and many other theists) continually fail to provide any evidence for your positive assertions. if you want to call me 'religious' for that, then go ahead if it makes you feel better.
Originally posted by Halitosewow, wrong again,,and just when I thought you had attained the highest possible level of wrongness.
As I was saying sis... π
Oh well, live and learn, some of us actually are capable of learning,, get your brain outta the stone age ,sis, we know so much more about the Universe now.
Originally posted by LemonJelloDarn memo! π Fine then! I'll leave it at that... π΅ I really doubt one can logically and physically prove the existance of God. There are many probability theories, but if you want beyond the shadow of a doubt stuff, I have yet to see it myself.
lol. still lol.
[b]I'd say you qualify perfectly.
you clearly missed the memo that i am also agnostic. if only one person is zealous around here, it ain't me. the only thing i would say i am zealous about is the fact that you (and many other theists) continually fail to provide any evidence for your positive assertions. if you want to call me 'religious' for that, then go ahead if it makes you feel better.[/b]
Originally posted by LemonJelloOh you poor man, better you than me, i heard it all before,, and he'll get it all twisted up when he stumbles over that foot in his mouth.
lol. still lol.
[b]I'd say you qualify perfectly.
you clearly missed the memo that i am also agnostic. if only one person is zealous around here, it ain't me. the only thing i would say i am zealous about is the fact that you (and many other theists) continually fail to provide any evidence for your positive assertions. if you want to call me 'religious' for that, then go ahead if it makes you feel better.[/b]
Originally posted by frogstompHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! You are really an enigma! Be it an occasionally funny one!
wow, wrong again,,and just when I thought you had attained the highest possible level of wrongness.
Oh well, live and learn, some of us actually are capable of learning,, get your brain outta the stone age ,sis, we know so much more about the Universe now.
Originally posted by Halitoseby this definition, masturbation may just be the most widely held religion.
You and Froggy seem to make a great pair 2. π
Definition no 4 of religion directly from the Oxford Concise Dictionary:
A cause, principle, or activity pursued with zeal or conscientious devotion.
I'd say you qualify perfectly.