More Right than God?

@josephw said
And given the predilection of certain posters to mischaracterize the posts of Christians here I wouldn't be surprised to know that Romans1009 was set up and trolled as a paedophile.

What on Earth does "trolled as a paedophile" mean?

@josephw said
I don't recall reading any "paedophilic trolling" out of Romans1009.

Given the circumstances, this ~ for all intents and purposes ~ is a lie. Shame on you josephw.

@josephw said
Divegeester said, "What you fail to comprehend Romans1009 is that it is YOU I don’t like so it is YOU I’m calling out simply because you are Romans1009 the guy who claims to be a Christian and then lies about being guy who polluted this website for month posting paedophilic trolling."

I don't recall reading any "paedophilic trolling" out of Romans1009. But then again I don ...[text shortened]... personal playground where he can say whatever he wants no matter how egregious and false it may be.

For what it's worth Joseph you are wrong about this. There was a period of time when this guy's old account (Romans1009) trolled FMF in particular with pedophilia jibes. It wasn't long before he was permanently banned from the site. (And rightly so). Nothing he posts now, under his new account, can ever excuse that. It was perverted.

@ghost-of-a-duke said
There was a period of time when this guy's old account (Romans1009) trolled FMF in particular with pedophilia jibes.

Actually, divegeester was the one who was the target of pedophilia "jokes" day in day out. As for me, Romans1009 used to say malicious things about my children and my wife. And he used to stalk you and troll you with personal information you'd shared on the forum.

@fmf said
Actually, divegeester was the one who was the target of pedophilia "jokes" day in day out. As for me, Romans1009 used to say malicious things about my children and my wife. And he used to stalk you and troll you with personal information you'd shared on the forum.

Yes, I stand corrected.

@fmf said
What on Earth does "trolled as a paedophile" mean?

Read my post. It's self explanatory.

@josephw said
Read my post. It's self explanatory.

No one has claimed that Romans1009 was "trolled as a paedophile". Don't be a buffoon. If you don't know what you're talking about, spare us your make-it-up-as-you-go-along stirring.

@fmf said
Why would you recall it? You weren't active on this forum in 2018; you did not post a single time. SecondSon was posting [and doing so a lot]. You stopped posting in 2017 and only returned very recently. Your 'testimony' about "Romans1009" is worthless. Partisan much?

When was Romans1009 banned?

And you are correct. I stopped posting in August 2017, and returned late last year.

Was Romans1009 banned before I stopped posting? Was his alleged crimes against you, divegeester and Ghost made before or after I stopped posting?

@josephw said
Was Romans1009 banned before I stopped posting? Was his alleged crimes against you, divegeester and Ghost made before or after I stopped posting?

Why on Earth were you making declarations about "not recalling" things, as if to exonerate him when you then have to ask me questions like this?

You stopped posting mid-2017. Romans1009 started posting at the end of January 2018 and continued until he was banned by the website for being a malicious troll in October 2018.

@josephw said
When was Romans1009 banned?

And you are correct. I stopped posting in August 2017, and returned late last year.

Was Romans1009 banned before I stopped posting? Was his alleged crimes against you, divegeester and Ghost made before or after I stopped posting?

You posted regularly during that period as @secondson.

Or are you going to deny it?

@fmf said
Given the circumstances, this ~ for all intents and purposes ~ is a lie. Shame on you josephw.

I don't recall reading any posts by Romans1009 that indicated he was a "paedophile".

Truth is I don't really focus on the posts of other Christians as much as I do others. I may have simply missed Romans1009 posts that you're referring to, but I do recall you, divegeester and Ghost saying he said the things you're implying he said.

But I take your accusations with a grain of salt because I know you and divegeester have a predilection for exaggerating and mischaracterizing what your debate opponents say.

@fmf said
Romans1009 started posting at the end of January 2018 and continued until he was banned by the website for being a malicious troll in October 2018.

If that's true, then it's no wonder I don't recall it.

@divegeester said
You posted regularly during that period as @secondson.

Or are you going to deny it?

I deny it.

@josephw said
I don't recall reading any posts by Romans1009 that indicated he was a "paedophile".

Who has claimed he "was a paedophile"? What are you on about?

@josephw said
But I take your accusations with a grain of salt because I know you and divegeester have a predilection for exaggerating and mischaracterizing what your debate opponents say.

So you have some sort of grudge ~ is that it? ~ against Ghost of a Duke, divegeester, and me that causes you to want to leap to the defence of perhaps the most malicious troll this forum has ever seen ~ even though you don't have a clue what you are talking about?