Mormons do consider themselves Christian. In their view, the Christian churches went apostate at some point after the resurrection of Jesus and they have established the one church, the "true" church of Latter-Day Saints.
Also:
http://www.redhotpawn.com/board/showthread.php?threadid=98620&page=1#post_1846945
mormons do believe in the atonement of the christ for the salvation of man. there view is atypical. they hold that the atonement begins with the visit to the garden at gethsemane and goes thru the trial and then the crucifixion. an atonement over several days. but as to the holding of 3:16 there would be a point of discussion as to "which jesus" they believe did the atonement ( a very long explanation ). to give the mormons their simple view it is the same christ as typically understood but not a christ as one of three inside the trinity and the typical view it is god in the thirdness of the trinity ( himself in another way ). mormons accept a seperate being as christ who is the son of god, who is also a seperate being. this is a very simple way of explaining it.
Originally posted by reinfeldSo, in short, in your opinion: Mormons are not christians? Or they are...?
mormons do believe in the atonement of the christ for the salvation of man. there view is atypical. they hold that the atonement begins with the visit to the garden at gethsemane and goes thru the trial and then the crucifixion. an atonement over several days. but as to the holding of 3:16 there would be a point of discussion as to "which jesus" they bel ...[text shortened]... is the son of god, who is also a seperate being. this is a very simple way of explaining it.
Originally posted by reinfeldIf to be a Christian one must accept Christ as God in the flesh then no, they are not Christian. When I say God, of course I mean the triune being. From what I have read, they readily accept us all as "gods" and, in fact, can become a god just as Christ is. In effect, we could be his equal. Therefore, if the mainline theology is correct and Christ was God in the flesh, that is part of the triune being, then such a theology would be blasphamous.
mormons do believe in the atonement of the christ for the salvation of man. there view is atypical. they hold that the atonement begins with the visit to the garden at gethsemane and goes thru the trial and then the crucifixion. an atonement over several days. but as to the holding of 3:16 there would be a point of discussion as to "which jesus" they bel ...[text shortened]... is the son of god, who is also a seperate being. this is a very simple way of explaining it.
i would agree that the mormons are not mainline. i would point out though that the idea that all men can become gods is an lds belief. i would say that they call it "progression" ( one can become better ). i find it very uncomfortable that they accept the idea that man can become god ( i believe reform mormonism would hold that man can profress to be "more like god" ). mormons believe that each human has a pre-mortal existence in the spirit, comes into the flesh as a man on this earth, dies and moves to a place in a hierarachy according to their works and beliefs. they believe both god and jesus have gone thru this same progression at one time.
Originally posted by whodeyWow. You sure are an arrogant jerk. You don't know whether they call
Both actually. What I do know is a lot about the theology and I can't say I agree with it. As for what they decide to call themselves, they can call themselves anything they desire.
themselves Christian or not (a pretty basic fact) but you know 'a lot about
the theology' and thus know enough to disagree with it?
I guarantee that you couldn't articulate even some of the most basic
tenets of Mormon theology.
Nemesio
Originally posted by no1marauderthe other three books of their canon is the pearl of great price, doctrine and covenants and the book of mormon. all other mormon writings and or speculations are held as valuable but they are not the official doctrine of the church. i do not know if all four are held in equal esteem except that i read that the bible and the book of mormon are considered equal and one is not superior except in the sense that the book of mormon, being a later book and one written to restore original christianity ( as lds understands ) it would probably have more value if one found a conflict in the two books.
The Mormons hold all of the Bible to be true.
Originally posted by no1marauderyes, but their own book supersedes it, for example, i was talking with a couple of Mormon missionaries in Glasgow, the host offered us a drink, coffee, tea and and coke if you wanted a soft drink. they refused, when i quizzed them why as i gulped down my fresh out of the fridge coca-cola, they said that Joseph Smith had been given 'direction to do with hot drinks', 'i said this was a cold drink', they stated that it was because it contained caffeine and said that it was a contaminant, as was wine and other stuff, i said incredulously, you never drank wine?, he said no. i said let me see your bible, he had an old version of new world translation printed by the watchtower society, a green version from the nineteen fifties, unfortunately i could not find the verse i was looking for , but here it is,
The Mormons hold all of the Bible to be true.[/b]
'For the kingdom of God does not mean eating and drinking, but means righteousness and peace and joy with holy spirit. For he who in this regard slaves for Christ is acceptable to God and has approval with men.', Romans 14:17-18
so because of the adherence to the teachings of Joseph Smith, this has superseded the actual content of the scriptures, in practice, although they hold it in esteem in word.