23 Oct 12
http://medicalxpress.com/news/2012-10-primates-common-blood-ancestor.html
More evidence mankind had common ancestors 20 million years ago, all primates, in fact. We all have ABO type blood and now it was shown that set of blood types came about much earlier than previously thought. DNA analysis showed this.
Originally posted by sonhousewhat about reptiles and birds, when did they decide to change from being cold blooded
http://medicalxpress.com/news/2012-10-primates-common-blood-ancestor.html
More evidence mankind had common ancestors 20 million years ago, all primates, in fact. We all have ABO type blood and now it was shown that set of blood types came about much earlier than previously thought. DNA analysis showed this.
to warm bloodied? DNA analysis, is that the same DNA evidence that not one of you
materialists could explain how you came about it?
- Joined
- 16 Jan 07
- Moves
- 95105
23 Oct 12
Originally posted by robbie carrobieis this where the god of gaps steps in?
what about reptiles and birds, when did they decide to change from being cold blooded
to warm bloodied? DNA analysis, is that the same DNA evidence that not one of you
materialists could explain how you came about it?
23 Oct 12
Originally posted by robbie carrobie...decide...?
what about reptiles and birds, when did they decide to change from being cold blooded
to warm bloodied? DNA analysis, is that the same DNA evidence that not one of you
materialists could explain how you came about it?
You don't seem to have quite got a handle on the evolutionary process there.
23 Oct 12
Originally posted by avalanchethecatoops my bad, happen to randomly occur through some process or another, possibly
...decide...?
You don't seem to have quite got a handle on the evolutionary process there.
genetic, possibly environment, possibly both, but as yet, we dont really know.
- Joined
- 31 May 06
- Moves
- 1795
23 Oct 12
Originally posted by robbie carrobieNo it didn't randomly occur and the process is evolution.
oops my bad, happen to randomly occur through some process or another, possibly
genetic, possibly environment, possibly both, but as yet, we dont really know.
Which you don't understand.
23 Oct 12
Originally posted by googlefudgeblah de blah de blah, the process is a hypothesis which cannot be falsified, is therefore
No it didn't randomly occur and the process is evolution.
Which you don't understand.
not science and deserves to be drop kicked to the realms of weird nerd fiction. Tell us
again why reptiles who apparently morphed into birds in the Darwinian scheme of
things, left off being cold bloodied and ended up being warm bloodied?
- Joined
- 31 May 06
- Moves
- 1795
23 Oct 12
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI have tried explaining evolution to lying ignoramuses like yourself (including yourself)
blah de blah de blah, the process is a hypothesis which cannot be falsified, is therefore
not science and deserves to be drop kicked to the realms of weird nerd fiction. Tell us
again why reptiles who apparently morphed into birds in the Darwinian scheme of
things, left off being cold bloodied and ended up being warm bloodied?
before and it never gets anywhere due to the fact that you wilfully refuse to engage
in any sort of reasoned discussion.
You also demonstrate a depressing inability to be able to make any sort of argument that
is not dripping with logical fallacies.
You are also an insulting (rudeword).
Which makes it hard to drum up the enthusiasm to explain the basics of evolution to you
again.
I do it every so often for those who might read it who have an open mind, but I really
can't be bothered to do it right now.
But saying that evolution can't be falsified is a downright lie.
And a bit rich coming from someone who's alternative is "god did it" which really can't
be falsified.
23 Oct 12
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWhy this deflection to birds and reptiles? They are on a totally different branch of the life tree and I think you know that, therefore you engage in deflection to obfuscate the issue. This issue is the commonality of very early primate types, the ancestor of all the primates, and all the diverse branching, one of which leads to homo sapians.
what about reptiles and birds, when did they decide to change from being cold blooded
to warm bloodied? DNA analysis, is that the same DNA evidence that not one of you
materialists could explain how you came about it?
23 Oct 12
Originally posted by sonhousea simple, 'I dont know and googlefudge doesn't either', will suffice, thank you.
Why this deflection to birds and reptiles? They are on a totally different branch of the life tree and I think you know that, therefore you engage in deflection to obfuscate the issue. This issue is the commonality of very early primate types, the ancestor of all the primates, and all the diverse branching, one of which leads to homo sapians.
23 Oct 12
Originally posted by googlefudgea Charlie Brown muffled trumpet sound of the teacher , 'wah wah wah'.
I have tried explaining evolution to lying ignoramuses like yourself (including yourself)
before and it never gets anywhere due to the fact that you wilfully refuse to engage
in any sort of reasoned discussion.
You also demonstrate a depressing inability to be able to make any sort of argument that
is not dripping with logical fallacies.
You ...[text shortened]... h coming from someone who's alternative is "god did it" which really can't
be falsified.
23 Oct 12
Originally posted by robbie carrobieIn other words, 150 years of work on evolution has resulted in absolutely nothing? The nothing part, of course, being where it collides with religious dogma and fairy tales from the biblical version of creation.
a simple, 'I dont know and googlefudge doesn't either', will suffice, thank you.
So it doesn't matter that the scientific method used to discover planets in the solar system or around other stars is the same as that used in evolution, or geology and many other sciences, you are ok with ALL those other sciences that use the same fundamental science program, THOSE are all ok, but somehow it all breaks down with evolution. Why don't you think about that for a moment.
23 Oct 12
Originally posted by sonhouseYes that is correct, Nada!
In other words, 150 years of work on evolution has resulted in absolutely nothing? The nothing part, of course, being where it collides with religious dogma and fairy tales from the biblical version of creation.
So it doesn't matter that the scientific method used to discover planets in the solar system or around other stars is the same as that used in ...[text shortened]... k, but somehow it all breaks down with evolution. Why don't you think about that for a moment.