New evidence for common ancestor, blood types:

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Yes that is correct, Nada!

There is a term for what you are suffering under, unknowingly of course:

Cognitive dissonance. You know in some part of your brain the scientific method works fine for stuff like physics, geology, optics, medicine, surgery, instrumentation and such but the exact same fundamental scientific method in your mind cannot work when it comes to evolution so there is a cognitive dissonance in your brain about that, one side going, wait a minute, there is something wrong here, and the part deluded by religion is going, no there isn't, I KNOW god did it.

Originally posted by sonhouse
There is a term for what you are suffering under, unknowingly of course:

Cognitive dissonance. You know in some part of your brain the scientific method works fine for stuff like physics, geology, optics, medicine, surgery, instrumentation and such but the exact same fundamental scientific method in your mind cannot work when it comes to evolution so the ...[text shortened]... thing wrong here, and the part deluded by religion is going, no there isn't, I KNOW god did it.

it's a sad state. unfortunately, they are programmed that they must believe in a very specific manufactured "reality" in order to be "saved" (spend an eternity around a bonfire singing kumbaya).

if anything conflicts with that manufactured 'reality' then their brain automatically rejects it in order to remain "saved."

we witness this sad event day in and day out on this forum.

Originally posted by sonhouse
http://medicalxpress.com/news/2012-10-primates-common-blood-ancestor.html

More evidence mankind had common ancestors 20 million years ago, all primates, in fact. We all have ABO type blood and now it was shown that set of blood types came about much earlier than previously thought. DNA analysis showed this.

Dogs and Cats both have two eyes and two ears and four feet, so obviously they are related (if similarities are all it takes to convince the evolution loving crowd).

Frankly, from my viewpoint, if the liberals believe they were evolved from apes, then they are probably correct, and have not yet evolved much further

Originally posted by sonhouse
In other words, 150 years of work on evolution has resulted in absolutely nothing? The nothing part, of course, being where it collides with religious dogma and fairy tales from the biblical version of creation.

So it doesn't matter that the scientific method used to discover planets in the solar system or around other stars is the same as that used in ...[text shortened]... k, but somehow it all breaks down with evolution. Why don't you think about that for a moment.

True. The many years of work on evolution has been a waste of time and effort and has only been used to deceive. 😏

Originally posted by CLL53
Dogs and Cats both have two eyes and two ears and four feet, so obviously they are related (if similarities are all it takes to convince the evolution loving crowd).

Yes, similarity is one of the best indicators of relation. There is no other reasonable explanation for the level of similarity we observe.

Originally posted by twhitehead
Yes, similarity is one of the best indicators of relation. There is no other reasonable explanation for the level of similarity we observe.

A common designer. 😏

Originally posted by CLL53
Dogs and Cats both have two eyes and two ears and four feet, so obviously they are related (if similarities are all it takes to convince the evolution loving crowd).

Frankly, from my viewpoint, if the liberals believe they were evolved from apes, then they are probably correct, and have not yet evolved much further

are you doing 'comedy'or is this what you really think?

Originally posted by stellspalfie
are you doing 'comedy'or is this what you really think?

That liberals likely have evolved from apes? Most certainly, they themselves openly proclaim it directly and shout it from the rooftops. They are proud of being monkey cousins, go figure...

Originally posted by twhitehead
Yes, similarity is one of the best indicators of relation. There is no other reasonable explanation for the level of similarity we observe.

There is a difference in "neccessary" and "sufficient". Similarities are necessary, but not sufficient to indicate proof of common lineage. There are some similarities between any two life forms, not because they share common lineage, but because they are ALIVE and all living things share some degree of commonality.

Originally posted by CLL53
There is a difference in "neccessary" and "sufficient". Similarities are necessary, but not sufficient to indicate proof of common lineage. There are some similarities between any two life forms, not because they share common lineage, but because they are ALIVE and all living things share some degree of commonality.

I never claimed it constituted proof. It does however constitute extremely convincing evidence.
The main reason most life forms share similarities is because they share a common lineage. Your 'explanation' that they are both 'life forms' is in fact not an explanation at all but a re-statement that they are similar. The question as to why they are similar remains unanswered by you. Therefore the most reasonable explanation (and only one so far) remains the one that I have given.

Originally posted by RJHinds
True. The many years of work on evolution has been a waste of time and effort and has only been used to deceive. 😏

You are missing, deliberately, my point.

Originally posted by sonhouse
http://medicalxpress.com/news/2012-10-primates-common-blood-ancestor.html

More evidence mankind had common ancestors 20 million years ago, all primates, in fact. We all have ABO type blood and now it was shown that set of blood types came about much earlier than previously thought. DNA analysis showed this.

This type of thinking is not even scientific.

Its like saying evolution is true because a dog has 2 legs and a bird has 2 legs......so dogs evolved from birds.

Or a cat has a tail and a kangaroo has a tail so cats evolved from kangaroos.

It not difficult to understand that when all the species were created that they are going to have similarities because they all came out of the same foundational ingredients.....or the same pot.

All things are made of air, earth, water, fire, ether, mind, intelligence and ego................so they are going to be similar very often in many ways.

Cheating science is just scratching around with the pot of ingredients to attempt to prop up the false theory of evolution.

None of these similarities mean anything except that one creator created everything with the same ingredients earth, water, fire, air ether, mind intelligence and false ego.

Its that simple.

Originally posted by Dasa
This type of thinking is not even scientific.

Its like saying evolution is true because a dog has 2 legs and a bird has 2 legs......so dogs evolved from birds.

Or a cat has a tail and a kangaroo has a tail so cats evolved from kangaroos.

It not difficult to understand that when all the species were created that they are going to have similarities beca ...[text shortened]... ingredients earth, water, fire, air ether, mind intelligence and false ego.

Its that simple.

He's Baaaack!

Your 'arguments' are so whacked out they don't even deserve a rebuttal.

Originally posted by twhitehead
I never claimed it constituted proof. It does however constitute extremely convincing evidence.
The main reason most life forms share similarities is because they share a common lineage. Your 'explanation' that they are both 'life forms' is in fact not an explanation at all but a re-statement that they are similar. The question as to why they are similar ...[text shortened]... ore the most reasonable explanation (and only one so far) remains the one that I have given.

From twhitehead, "It does however constitute extremely convincing evidence."

I say, "A STRONG DELUSION FOR THOSE WHO WISH NOT TO BELIEVE THE TRUTH FROM GOD."

The coming of the lawless one is according to the working of Satan, with all power, signs, and lying wonders, and with all unrighteous deception among those who perish, because they did not receive the love of the truth, that they might be saved. And for this reason God will send them strong delusion, that they should believe the lie, that they all may be condemned who did not believe the truth but had pleasure in unrighteousness.
(2 Thessalonians 2:9-12 NKJV)

Originally posted by RJHinds
From twhitehead, "It does however constitute extremely convincing evidence."

[b]I say, "A STRONG DELUSION FOR THOSE WHO WISH NOT TO BELIEVE THE TRUTH FROM GOD."

The coming of the lawless one is according to the working of Satan, with all power, signs, and lying wonders, and with all unrighteous deception among those who perish, because they did no ...[text shortened]... id not believe the truth but had pleasure in unrighteousness.
(2 Thessalonians 2:9-12 NKJV)[/b]

Funny how it always seems to be all that bad stuff coming in just a few years, preached by Paulists for the last 2000 years and yet when all is said and done, no big bad guy from the sky comes down and does anything humans haven't already done to one another.

The truth is, your bible was written by men who maybe THOUGHT they were being inspired by some deity or other but in fact it was men making up stories because the rabble they lived with were too primitive to control otherwise.

I am sorry for your delusions. And the billions of the world in the same boat.