No wonder they protect pedophile priests

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
I see, so something may be a sexual orientation and a mental illness, what about homosexuality, is that a mental illness? If not, why not?

im sure you will disagree with me here..but. homosexuality, like heterosexuality causes the individual no harm and does not interfere with leading a 'normal' life and cause no threat or difficulties to the rest of society.

mental illness causes the individual to struggle with every day life and/or is a physical threat to themselves and the public

Originally posted by stellspalfie
im sure you will disagree with me here..but. homosexuality, like heterosexuality causes the individual no harm and does not interfere with leading a 'normal' life and cause no threat or difficulties to the rest of society.

mental illness causes the individual to struggle with every day life and/or is a physical threat to themselves and the public

no harm, what about all those HIV+ sufferers, they might just disagree. Anyhow, i really must go.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
no harm, what about all those HIV+ sufferers, they might just disagree. Anyhow, i really must go.

seriously, you are pathetic.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Yes it certainly is radical.

Its only a matter of time before this dreadful scenario happens although I suspect that the public shall be less convinced and less sympathetic to the case than they seemingly were to the disproportionate representation of homosexuality in the popular media.

It needs to be seen for what it is, unnatural. Simply be ...[text shortened]... ty and paedophilia are deviations from what is natural, anomalies and should be treated as such.

Anomalies:
albinos
6 toes
3rd nipples
webbed feet

what shall we do? burn them?

Originally posted by wolfgang59
Anomalies:
albinos
6 toes
3rd nipples
webbed feet

what shall we do? burn them?

Those are not sexual deviants, are they. No need to be a drama queen!

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Homosexuality and paedophilia are deviations from what is natural, anomalies and should be treated as such.

You said they should be treated as anomalies.
I posted a few anomalies so that we could all see what you are talking about.

Did you mean to say "sexual anomalies"?

Originally posted by wolfgang59
You said they should be treated as anomalies.
I posted a few anomalies so that we could all see what you are talking about.

Did you mean to say "sexual anomalies"?

we were talking about sexuality , were we not? Other persons understood the intent, why cant you? Or shall we include every type of anomaly in the galaxy?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
we were talking about sexuality , were we not? Other persons understood the intent, why cant you? Or shall we include every type of anomaly in the galaxy?

an adjective would have sufficed

... Now;
Why the sexual hang-ups again?

Originally posted by wolfgang59
an adjective would have sufficed

... Now;
Why the sexual hang-ups again?

That's exactly what I was thinking as well.

Well Robbie, you sure you're not coming out of any closet(s)?

Originally posted by wolfgang59
You said they should be treated as anomalies.
I posted a few anomalies so that we could all see what you are talking about.

Did you mean to say "sexual anomalies"?

well he has told us that he refuses to preform or receive oral sex (with a woman).

im sure this could be described as a sexual anomaly as the majority of people do it.

Originally posted by wolfgang59
an adjective would have sufficed

... Now;
Why the sexual hang-ups again?

hang ups? sigh, why do you need to be reeled in again and again to focus on the issues rather than the personalities who make them.

Originally posted by karoly aczel
That's exactly what I was thinking as well.

Well Robbie, you sure you're not coming out of any closet(s)?

Karoly Poly you make the most grandiose assertions on the basis of non existent evidence, it is arrogant, please try to refrain from doing so.

Originally posted by stellspalfie
well he has told us that he refuses to preform or receive oral sex (with a woman).

im sure this could be described as a sexual anomaly as the majority of people do it.

Argumentum ad populum, arguments made on the basis of popular opinion are fallacious. Everyone reads The Sun newspaper therefore it must be good. See the emperors new clothes.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Argumentum ad populum, arguments made on the basis of popular opinion are fallacious. See the emperors new clothes.

Anomaly -

Deviation or departure from the normal or common order, form, or rule.

Originally posted by stellspalfie
Anomaly -

Deviation or departure from the normal or common order, form, or rule.

you will need to demonstrate that my refusing to participate in oral sex in an abnormality, contrary to nature. common order or a rule. All you have provided for the substantiation of the assertion is an appeal to popular opinion, everyone does it therefore it must be normal, its fallacious. Popular opinion is a bandwagon argument, the proposition being held to be true simply on the basis that its popular. Its a nonsense.