@secondson saidNothing?
Nothing.
Perhaps take another look.
These are the words that medullah offered as if they were some kind of smoking gun en route to 'one world religion':
"We, who believe in God and in the final meeting with Him and His judgment, on the basis of our religious and moral responsibility, and through this Document, call upon ourselves, upon the leaders of the world as well as the architects of international policy and world economy, to work strenuously to spread the culture of tolerance and of living together in peace; to intervene at the earliest opportunity to stop the shedding of innocent blood and bring an end to wars, conflicts, environmental decay and the moral and cultural decline that the world is presently experiencing." [See page 14 for the whole post]
How do you see these words as being evidence of an "agenda being foisted on an unsuspecting world"?
What part of that quote to you object to?
@whodey saidThe thing is no one is without blood on their hands. Its always going to be easy to say look at what they did, because they are everyone. Now a one world government, how can that actually occur? Someone going to create a list of things everyone agrees to tolerate, you must accept these or your in the hateful group of the completely intolerant?
It seems like the change occurred when the Grand Mufti Amin Husseieni joined Hitler to help eradicate the Zionists from creating their own country.
https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/the-mufti-and-the-f-uuml-hrer
His nephew became Yassar Arafat and the rest is history.
@kellyjay saidChristianity is intolerant. That's why "they", the power brokers, must dilute the message of the gospel, the "narrow way", to blend it into the new world order of a unified faith of tolerance.
The thing is no one is without blood on their hands. Its always going to be easy to say look at what they did, because they are everyone. Now a one world government, how can that actually occur? Someone going to create a list of things everyone agrees to tolerate, you must accept these or your in the hateful group of the completely intolerant?
Not everyone has blood on their hands.
@secondson saidThese "power brokers" who according to your ideology on the end times will control, food, information flow, medicine, religion, the military etc ... how will they manage to "dilute the gospel" when nation will be rising against nation?
Christianity is intolerant. That's why "they", the power brokers, must dilute the message of the gospel, the "narrow way", to blend it into the new world order of a unified faith of tolerance.
As Jesus actually says will happen in the bible....
@kellyjay saidDo you think the root of the One World Government is the Democrat Party?
The thing is no one is without blood on their hands. Its always going to be easy to say look at what they did, because they are everyone. Now a one world government, how can that actually occur? Someone going to create a list of things everyone agrees to tolerate, you must accept these or your in the hateful group of the completely intolerant?
@secondson saidMorning SS (secondson) 😉
Hey medullah, are you premillennialist by chance?
There's a whole lot of scripture to sift through with regards to the "last days". I'm still sifting, and learning, but I think I have a handle on the big picture as it were.
No sir. In fact I had to look it up to discover what it was.
I'm one of those people that don't believe that the truth is the sole possession of one denomination, and that if people stopped squabbling they might be able to learn from each other.
It's a bit akin to us all having a piece of the jigsaw puzzle, although in some cases more pieces than others, and some are mistakenly trying to make fit something that dropped out of a packet of biscuits.
This is why I take an interest in other people's perspective and like to know how they arrived at it.
So there was no response to my question on what is right wing from the person that likes to throw the terminology around and accuse people of being such. It doesn’t surprise me.
In the UK many would look at the US and say the Democrats are right wing, and the Republicans are even further right wing (typical pub talk, I don't think right/left actually exists per say). My mate the Republican calls Democrats communists (he really hasn't got a clue).
When I get called names I like to drill down if I can. Doesn't matter if I can't.
@philokalia saidThank you, I try to contribute.
I enjoy both the contributions of Medullah and Second Son here. Very great stuff.
@fmf saidWhat I said on P14 was
Nothing?
Perhaps take another look.
These are the words that medullah offered as if they were some kind of smoking gun en route to 'one world religion':
[b]"We, who believe in God and in the final meeting with Him and His judgment, on the basis of our religious and moral responsibility, and through this Document, call upon ourselves, upon the leaders of the world as well ...[text shortened]... of an "agenda being foisted on an unsuspecting world"?
What part of that quote to you object to?
"There was a document signed earlier this year between Islam, Christianity, Judaism and some other faiths (which I haven't Id'd). This doesn't prove the one world religion to my way of thinking, but I find it interesting."
I'm not sure that qualifies as a smoking gun but something is going on yes.
@medullah saidYes, I provided the page number. What do you make of the words you quoted? I don't quite understand why both you and SecondSo are being so evasive.
What I said on P14 was
"There was a document signed earlier this year between Islam, Christianity, Judaism and some other faiths (which I haven't Id'd). This doesn't prove the one world religion to my way of thinking, but I find it interesting."
I'm not sure that qualifies as a smoking gun but something is going on yes.
I'm going to dip in and out during the day; It's month end, I'm working from home, but I have a to look after the people that pay me as a priority.
Let's talk about this Billion population.
When I floated this the other day a couple of people came back with the objection that there is no way that they would cull 6 billion people.
If you are politically motivated and have a party allegiance, that means that almost certainly if what I am saying is true you are going to get shafted (betrayed). It implies that the people at the top of your political party that you support are going to let you down in a very big way. As we all know that political leaders never lie, that obviously can't be true.
The papacy has a been engaged for some time around a one world religion and a one world government, and talking up the UN. That leads us to the document signed circa February 2019. If you just add up the numbers of Catholics + Muslims + Jews you are getting on for 3 Billion people. We can be certain that the religious leaders would never let us down, as never do the religious authorities preach one thing and practice another.
According to the Georgia Guide Stones (circa 1978), whose principals were later embedded in the 1992 Rio treaty and confirmed in the 2012 Rio treaty they are talking of a population reduction to between 0.5 - 1.0 Billion people. There is a Democrat web site that refers.
The 1992 treaty was signed by GH Bush and ratified by W Clinton when they were respectively president. It's cross party. We have the same stuff in the UK. John Major signed and under Tony Blair preparations started.
Let's not get carried away though, nobody has said that somebody flips a switch one day and 6 billion vanish.
I'll be back to do the how it can be done a bit later.
@fmf saidOK so clearly they are trying to unite religions. But, playing my own devil's advocate, because a few get together and sign this declaration doesn't not in itself constitute a one world religion.
What "something"? Explain. They would appear to be admirable and words. What "something" do you see?
However it would appear to be a stepping stone given what has been indicated regarding a desire for a one world religion.