Go back
Premise: Objective morals do not exist

Premise: Objective morals do not exist

Spirituality

dj2becker

Joined
01 Oct 04
Moves
12095
Clock
13 Nov 17
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @dj2becker
I would be either if I were you considering the 'arguments' I would have to try to defend.
*wouldn't

Ghost of a Duke

Joined
14 Mar 15
Moves
29602
Clock
13 Nov 17
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @avalanchethecat
No i'm not interested in another discussion with you. My point is made by virtue of the existence of those arguments.
The link you provided is perfectly sufficient.

http://www.evilbible.com/evil-bible-home-page/rape-in-the-bible/

dj2becker

Joined
01 Oct 04
Moves
12095
Clock
13 Nov 17

Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-duke
The link you provided is perfectly sufficient.

http://www.evilbible.com/evil-bible-home-page/rape-in-the-bible/
Pick any of the arguments you believe to be the strongest.

a
Not actually a cat

The Flat Earth

Joined
09 Apr 10
Moves
14988
Clock
13 Nov 17
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-duke
The link you provided is perfectly sufficient.

http://www.evilbible.com/evil-bible-home-page/rape-in-the-bible/
Yep, and we all know that, but becker is obliged by his own argument to insist there is no ambivalence. That's why he's trying so hard to to get somebody to argue it with him, he needs to move the focus of the discussion so he can pretend he's not hoist by his own petard.

Ghost of a Duke

Joined
14 Mar 15
Moves
29602
Clock
13 Nov 17
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @avalanchethecat
Yep, and we all know that, but becker is obliged by his own argument to insist there is no ambivalence. That's why he's trying so hard to to get somebody to argue it with him, he needs to move the focus of the discussion so he can pretend he's not hoist by his own petard.
Indeed.

apathist
looking for loot

western colorado

Joined
05 Feb 11
Moves
9664
Clock
13 Nov 17
Vote Up
Vote Down

There are all kinds in this world.

Heloo evolution

Would it be better if there were not.

dj2becker

Joined
01 Oct 04
Moves
12095
Clock
15 Nov 17

If you thought any of the arguments had a leg to stand on you would have presented them by now.

a
Not actually a cat

The Flat Earth

Joined
09 Apr 10
Moves
14988
Clock
15 Nov 17

Originally posted by @dj2becker
If you thought any of the arguments had a leg to stand on you would have presented them by now.
The arguments are well attested, referenced in this thread and very well known. If your scripture was not ambivalent on the subject, they would not exist. Whether you think you can argue them away is entirely irrelevant.

dj2becker

Joined
01 Oct 04
Moves
12095
Clock
16 Nov 17

Originally posted by @avalanchethecat
The arguments are well attested, referenced in this thread and very well known. If your scripture was not ambivalent on the subject, they would not exist. Whether you think you can argue them away is entirely irrelevant.
Is it your subjective opinion that the Bible is ambivalent on the topic of rape or is it an objective fact?

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
16 Nov 17
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @sonhouse
After 33 pages of this repartee has anyone actually changed their stance?
Guess not.

a
Not actually a cat

The Flat Earth

Joined
09 Apr 10
Moves
14988
Clock
16 Nov 17
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @sonhouse
Guess not.
Ah come on, in all the years you've been coming here, have you ever seen that happen?

Ghost of a Duke

Joined
14 Mar 15
Moves
29602
Clock
16 Nov 17

Originally posted by @avalanchethecat
The arguments are well attested, referenced in this thread and very well known. If your scripture was not ambivalent on the subject, they would not exist. Whether you think you can argue them away is entirely irrelevant.
Anyone genuinely familiar with scripture would readily admit there is some difficult stuff in there about rape etc. No additional references or sources are required, it's all there in black and white for anyone who knows their bible.

So, for example, when we read Numbers 31:15-18, it really is pure stupidity to speak of subjectivity and the like:

"But Moses was furious with all the military commanders who had returned from the battle. “Have you allowed all the women to live?” he asked them. 16 “They were the ones who followed Balaam’s advice and enticed the Israelites to be unfaithful to the Lord in the Peor incident, so that a plague struck the Lord’s people. 17 Now kill all the boys. And kill every woman who has slept with a man, 18 but save for yourselves every girl who has never slept with a man."

a
Not actually a cat

The Flat Earth

Joined
09 Apr 10
Moves
14988
Clock
16 Nov 17
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @dj2becker
Is it your subjective opinion that the Bible is ambivalent on the topic of rape or is it an objective fact?
From where do you derive your moral certainty regarding rape given that your scripture is ambivalent on the subject?

dj2becker

Joined
01 Oct 04
Moves
12095
Clock
16 Nov 17

Originally posted by @avalanchethecat
From where do you derive your moral certainty regarding rape given that your scripture is ambivalent on the subject?
Is it your subjective opinion that the Bible is ambivalent on the topic of rape or is it an objective fact?

a
Not actually a cat

The Flat Earth

Joined
09 Apr 10
Moves
14988
Clock
17 Nov 17
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @dj2becker
Is it your subjective opinion that the Bible is ambivalent on the topic of rape or is it an objective fact?
Weak.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.