22 Dec 07
Retired Bishop, John Shelby Spong describes fear and religion. As opposed to false religion that brings security and certainty, true religion is the opposite, not acting as the security in place of fear, with the certainty of theism and religious hierarchy, but as the enabler of the courage to be in spite of in acceptance of anxiety and fear.
"Security is so seductive, and insecurity is so frightening. But security is always false, and insecurity is always real. No religion can make anyone secure, though it, like the drugs on which our society is so dependent, can give the illusion of security. True religion enables one to grasp life with the radical insecurity and to live it with courage. It does not aid us in the pretense that our insecurities have been taken away."
22 Dec 07
Originally posted by knightmeister"Be afraid! It's easier to control you that way!" (Rumsfeld and Cheney, 2001)
Retired Bishop, John Shelby Spong describes fear and religion. As opposed to false religion that brings security and certainty, true religion is the opposite, not acting as the security in place of fear, with the certainty of theism and religious hierarchy, but as the enabler of the courage to be in spite of in acceptance of anxiety and fear.
"Secur ...[text shortened]... with courage. It does not aid us in the pretense that our insecurities have been taken away."
Seriously, if religion is about fear, and not comfort, that's only another reason we need to drive superstition away.
22 Dec 07
1 edit
Originally posted by scottishinnzMe thinks you missunderstood the quote (or least interpreted it to suit your own argument) . You have been away so long I had forgotten how adept you were at turning almost anything around to have a jab at religion. You are so much better at it than your peers.
"Be afraid! It's easier to control you that way!" (Rumsfeld and Cheney, 2001)
Seriously, if religion is about fear, and not comfort, that's only another reason we need to drive superstition away.
22 Dec 07
Originally posted by knightmeisterSecurity does not lie with any religion, it lies with Jesus Christ. You can have security through a relationship with Jesus Christ.
Retired Bishop, John Shelby Spong describes fear and religion. As opposed to false religion that brings security and certainty, true religion is the opposite, not acting as the security in place of fear, with the certainty of theism and religious hierarchy, but as the enabler of the courage to be in spite of in acceptance of anxiety and fear.
"Secur ...[text shortened]... with courage. It does not aid us in the pretense that our insecurities have been taken away."
22 Dec 07
Originally posted by knightmeisterGee thanks!
Me thinks you missunderstood the quote (or least interpreted it to suit your own argument) . You have been away so long I had forgotten how adept you were at turning almost anything around to have a jab at religion. You are so much better at it than your peers.
But, no - really, any credit has to go to religion, and religious people themselves - I am but a mirror.
22 Dec 07
Originally posted by scottishinnzDon't bother with "religious" people ( Jesus didn't) , look out for spiritual people . There's a big difference. You will find spiritual people don't look so "religious" and will give you less opportunities to pursue your favourite hobby of ridiculing that which you fear.
Gee thanks!
But, no - really, any credit has to go to religion, and religious people themselves - I am but a mirror.
22 Dec 07
Originally posted by knightmeisterExactly!!!!!!!!!!!!!!😀
Don't bother with "religious" people ( Jesus didn't) , look out for spiritual people . There's a big difference. You will find spiritual people don't look so "religious" and will give you less opportunities to pursue your favourite hobby of ridiculing that which you fear.
22 Dec 07
1 edit
Originally posted by chappy1How convenient for your point of view that you are deluded enough to think that a mismash of writings lumped together 1700 years ago proves ANYTHING. I "believe in the Bible" in the sense that I believe that the Bible exists but as a "book" - and not a particulary good one.
It's already been proven. You need look no further than the Bible. But of course you don't believe in the Bible, do you? How convenient for your point of view.
I recommend the Tao-te Ching and the Upanishads as books better reflecting spirituality than the history of atrocities and mass murders that is the Old Testament and the collection of letters by people that didn't even know Jesus that mainly comprise the New Testament.
22 Dec 07
Originally posted by no1marauderIf thats how you feel then you don't truely understand what has been written.
How convenient for your point of view that you are deluded enough to think that a mismash of writings lumped together 1700 years ago proves ANYTHING. I "believe in the Bible" in the sense that I believe that the Bible exists but as a "book" - and not a particulary good one.
I recommend the Tao-te Ching and the Upanishads as books better refle ...[text shortened]... on of letters by people that didn't even know Jesus that mainly comprise the New Testament.
23 Dec 07
Originally posted by knightmeisterYou're religious. Chappy1 is religious. Look it up.
Don't bother with "religious" people ( Jesus didn't) , look out for spiritual people . There's a big difference. You will find spiritual people don't look so "religious" and will give you less opportunities to pursue your favourite hobby of ridiculing that which you fear.