11 Jan 11
Originally posted by Agergif he ever called someone child abuser i would find it immensely funny. not funny haha but funny as in "this milk i left in the fridge for 2 months tastes funny". funny wrong.
When vishvahetu makes a claim, there are 3 cases which follow:
1) Someone disagrees with him whence he concludes and states they are dishonest, meat eating, child-abusing, intellectually defective, madness disease afflicted cheating scientists/followers of false religions, etc...
2) Someone agrees with him - and no actual debate occurs.
3) No one acknowle ...[text shortened]... om both sides.
It's sort of pointless engaging with the guy unless he changes his ways.
if i recall correctly, he himself stated that should his children die he would feel not feel sadness, not mourn, and he states that any animal produce is a sin to eat which would mean he has either broken this view when his children were infants or he is a child abuser himself and starved his kids with rabbit food.
however, i wish to believe that he is a troll and and its best that he be ignored.
11 Jan 11
Originally posted by karoly aczelI liked you better when I thought you were a girl. 😕
hehe😀
You guys crack me up.
Surely you guys aren't that sensitve, after all, its juz the net. Tis not real my good man!
But of course you know that.
Now if you guys really wanted to stop feeding the troll, as you put it, then you wouldn't bump his thread to the top with repeated silliness.
Geez, its nearly as silly as how Vishva rants sometimes...hehe,lol😀
11 Jan 11
Originally posted by Zahlanzi🙂
actually the construct was intended this way. by reading from right to left, you have 2 snoozing smileys, one 1 digit, 6 exclamation points. that requires that no more no less than the sum of these symbols be placed in front of the word snooze. you achieve perfection this way, the only way to do so.
all other ways of portraying snoozes are flawed, dish ...[text shortened]... s. the universe has been put to sleep many times before and only these sacred teachings endured.
(We may have been through many "wake ups" in the past, but we have not been through this one yet...)
11 Jan 11
Originally posted by karoly aczelThere are two ways of interpreting that term " Christ Consciousness
Christ conciousness does not mean thinking about christ or worshipping him or whatever.
It means a mind that is elevated into the same "heaven" that Jesus apprently went to. It is an interdimensional mind.
1. Like you said...... having the mind of Christ.
2. Being conscious of the Christ and remembering the instructions and words of Jesus.
----------------------------------
Christ is the anointed one or messiah.
So Christ consciousness would be thinking of the Messiah (Jesus), remembering his instructions and words.
Having the same mind as Jesus is a big ask, and if one was successful in doing that, they would be well on their way to Godhead.
11 Jan 11
Originally posted by ZahlanziNo you didn't recall correctly, and have only fabricated falsity.
if he ever called someone child abuser i would find it immensely funny. not funny haha but funny as in "this milk i left in the fridge for 2 months tastes funny". funny wrong.
if i recall correctly, he himself stated that should his children die he would feel not feel sadness, not mourn, and he states that any animal produce is a sin to eat which would ...[text shortened]... od.
however, i wish to believe that he is a troll and and its best that he be ignored.
This is what I mean by dishonesty.
11 Jan 11
4 edits
Originally posted by ZahlanziWhich version of the Holy snooze texts are you reading!?? Does it not say in Dozey:10:4
actually the construct was intended this way. by reading from right to left, you have 2 snoozing smileys, one 1 digit, 6 exclamation points. that requires that no more no less than the sum of these symbols be placed in front of the word snooze. you achieve perfection this way, the only way to do so.
all other ways of portraying snoozes are flawed, dish ...[text shortened]... s. the universe has been put to sleep many times before and only these sacred teachings endured.
"and the many snoozes shall be to one snooze, that the many surprises shall be to one"?
Clearly this is talking about the ratios of snoozes to exclamation marks and that they should be equal!
I'm afraid it is you who is being dishonest here since you believe in a false interpretation of the sacred words. What's more is if you are teaching this to others then you are guilty of child abuse and eating meat.
11 Jan 11
1 edit
Originally posted by divegeesterYou first need to have faith in smileys - once you stop being a cheating, dishonest, skeptic and believe fully that the smileys are the one and only Truth then I will show you my evidence.
Do you have some evidence to back that opinion up? You emoticon users are frankly barking mad and living in a world of your own making - just because smiley says it's so, doesn't mean it is!
Until then I will expose your falsehoods and lies. 😛
11 Jan 11
Originally posted by ZahlanziHe hasa indeed called people a child abuser - on more than one occasion. If you teach evolution yo your kids then apparently you are a child abuser because you're making them believe their grandparents are monkeys 😵
if he ever called someone child abuser i would find it immensely funny. not funny haha but funny as in "this milk i left in the fridge for 2 months tastes funny". funny wrong.
if i recall correctly, he himself stated that should his children die he would feel not feel sadness, not mourn, and he states that any animal produce is a sin to eat which would ...[text shortened]... od.
however, i wish to believe that he is a troll and and its best that he be ignored.
11 Jan 11
Originally posted by AgergYes and I will say it a thousand times......anyone who teaches children falsity is a child abuser...
He hasa indeed called people a child abuser - on more than one occasion. If you teach evolution yo your kids then apparently you are a child abuser because you're making them believe their grandparents are monkeys 😵
The rest that was posted was false,..... and when atheists are exposed as dishonest, they fabricate anything at all to discredit the truth.
11 Jan 11
Originally posted by Agergthen i say he is a rabbit. because he doesn't eat meat and as we all know, rabbits don't eat meat.
He hasa indeed called people a child abuser - on more than one occasion. If you teach evolution yo your kids then apparently you are a child abuser because you're making them believe their grandparents are monkeys 😵
therefore he is a rabbit. obviously.
11 Jan 11
Originally posted by Agergyour argument makes sense but i am right and you are wrong.
Which version of the Holy snooze texts are you reading!?? Does it not say in Dozey:10:4
"and the many snoozes shall be to one snooze, that the many surprises shall be to one"?
Clearly this is talking about the ratios of snoozes to exclamation marks and that they should be equal!
I'm afraid it is you who is being dishonest here since you believe in a fal ...[text shortened]... re is if you are teaching this to others then you are guilty of child abuse and eating meat.
just because i am right and you are always wrong.
11 Jan 11
2 edits
Originally posted by ZahlanziThat would explain a few things; in particular his penchant for recycling the crap he leaves all over the place.
then i say he is a rabbit. because he doesn't eat meat and as we all know, rabbits don't eat meat.
therefore he is a rabbit. obviously.
Though given the rate those creatures multiply, I really hope he isn't a rabbit!!
11 Jan 11
Originally posted by ZahlanziBut you realise it is of course impossible for me to agree with you on this one; since if I did agree with you that you were always right and I was always wrong, then I would be wrong in agreeing with you. This would imply something amiss with your argument!
your argument makes sense but i am right and you are wrong.
just because i am right and you are always wrong.