Originally posted by ChessPraxisIt is a common belief that a tree will produce a ring each year. However,
You'd think with as many limbs are they have to work with they could make more than one ring in a year.
Slackers ðŸ˜
this has not been proven to be fool proof and we have may fools who
accept it without question.
Originally posted by RJHindsIs it this site that has indoctrinated you to the degree you cannot think for yourself anymore?
http://creation.com/tree-ring-dating-dendrochronology
Don Batten who calls himself Ph.D. has written the words given by the link that RJHinds refers to and so religiously believes in. He is a frawd. Read more about him at
http://www.noanswersingenesis.org.au/aig_strawmen_rw.htm
If creation is based upon these kind of frauds, then no wonder why their faith is so weak.
Originally posted by FabianFnasThe following is what creationwiki has on Dr. Don Batten.
Is it this site that has indoctrinated you to the degree you cannot think for yourself anymore?
Don Batten who calls himself Ph.D. has written the words given by the link that RJHinds refers to and so religiously believes in. He is a frawd. Read more about him at
http://www.noanswersingenesis.org.au/aig_strawmen_rw.htm
If creation is based upon these kind of frauds, then no wonder why their faith is so weak.
http://creationwiki.org/Don_Batten
Apparently, no one has ever heard of the guy who wrote your article.
Originally posted by RJHindsI just had to look at http://creationwiki.org/Don_Batten
The following is what creationwiki has on Dr. Don Batten.
http://creationwiki.org/Don_Batten.
Apparently he wrote "The Creation Answers Book"
which answers "" about 60 of the 20 most asked questions ... about evolution ..."
mmm I wonder if the site's Science is as good as their Math?
Originally posted by wolfgang59It is supposed to say "over 60 of the most asked questions in 20 categories".
I just had to look at http://creationwiki.org/Don_Batten
Apparently he wrote "The Creation Answers Book"
which answers "" about [b]60 of the 20 most asked questions ... about evolution ..."
mmm I wonder if the site's Science is as good as their Math?[/b]
He should not be held responsible for someone else's error. See the following
for the actual information on the book:
http://usstore.creation.com/catalog/creation-answers-book-p-944.html?osCsid=pv8p4lm2mn0nerfb28n75e0ru1
You have to love the fact that a moron get rich off of other morons. The circle is complete. I am dreading RJ's "intellegent" quotes that he will pull from this book to teach us all how wrong we are. He already knows that we think the book is bogus, but he will try anyways.
Someone should invent a bug zapper for christians.
31 Dec 11
Originally posted by usmc7257This is the Spiritual Forum not the Science Forum. So you are free to go
You have to love the fact that a moron get rich off of other morons. The circle is complete. I am dreading RJ's "intellegent" quotes that he will pull from this book to teach us all how wrong we are. He already knows that we think the book is bogus, but he will try anyways.
Someone should invent a bug zapper for christians.
or not pay any attention to our belief in the Holy Spirit, if you wish.
Originally posted by RJHindsIf we athiests were not here, who would you have to preach to? Oh wait, you would further alienate other christians by telling them that they aren't believing the right way. I guess you don't need me after all.
This is the Spiritual Forum not the Science Forum. So you are free to go
or not pay any attention to our belief in the Holy Spirit, if you wish.
That being said, what did my post have to do with the science forum? Is it because I mocked your favorite book (other than the bible)? Get a clue.
Originally posted by RJHindsYou gave us the link; now you are saying the link is no good and giving us another!
It is supposed to say "over 60 of the most asked questions in 20 categories".
He should not be held responsible for someone else's error. See the following
for the actual information on the book:
http://usstore.creation.com/catalog/creation-answers-book-p-944.html?osCsid=pv8p4lm2mn0nerfb28n75e0ru1
Why don't you read these links yourself?
Originally posted by wolfgang59I read the link. But I gave the link to provide the bio on Dr. Don Batten
You gave us the link; now you are saying the link is no good and giving us another!
Why don't you read these links yourself?
in contrast to the uknown person provided by FabianFnas that claims to
refute him. However, you missed the point and concentrated on a
mistatement about one of his books instead. Duh.
http://www.christiananswers.net/creation/people/batten-d.html