Go back
Research shows brain atrophy in born again's:

Research shows brain atrophy in born again's:

Spirituality

RJHinds
The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
Clock
30 Dec 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sonhouse
But you saw a ring, you could say that represents at least one year's growth?
No.

C
Cowboy From Hell

American West

Joined
19 Apr 10
Moves
55013
Clock
30 Dec 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
They are used to make totem poles, too. 😉
You'd think with as many limbs are they have to work with they could make more than one ring in a year.
Slackers 😠

RJHinds
The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
Clock
30 Dec 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ChessPraxis
You'd think with as many limbs are they have to work with they could make more than one ring in a year.
Slackers 😠
It is a common belief that a tree will produce a ring each year. However,
this has not been proven to be fool proof and we have may fools who
accept it without question.

C
Cowboy From Hell

American West

Joined
19 Apr 10
Moves
55013
Clock
30 Dec 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
It is a common belief that a tree will produce a ring each year. However,
this has not been proven to be fool proof and we have may fools who
accept it without question.
When I see the ring, and have it appraised, then I'll believe it.

RJHinds
The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
Clock
30 Dec 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ChessPraxis
When I see the ring, and have it appraised, then I'll believe it.
http://creation.com/tree-ring-dating-dendrochronology

F

Joined
11 Nov 05
Moves
43938
Clock
30 Dec 11
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
http://creation.com/tree-ring-dating-dendrochronology
Is it this site that has indoctrinated you to the degree you cannot think for yourself anymore?

Don Batten who calls himself Ph.D. has written the words given by the link that RJHinds refers to and so religiously believes in. He is a frawd. Read more about him at
http://www.noanswersingenesis.org.au/aig_strawmen_rw.htm

If creation is based upon these kind of frauds, then no wonder why their faith is so weak.

RJHinds
The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
Clock
30 Dec 11
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FabianFnas
Is it this site that has indoctrinated you to the degree you cannot think for yourself anymore?

Don Batten who calls himself Ph.D. has written the words given by the link that RJHinds refers to and so religiously believes in. He is a frawd. Read more about him at
http://www.noanswersingenesis.org.au/aig_strawmen_rw.htm

If creation is based upon these kind of frauds, then no wonder why their faith is so weak.
The following is what creationwiki has on Dr. Don Batten.

http://creationwiki.org/Don_Batten

Apparently, no one has ever heard of the guy who wrote your article.

wolfgang59
Quiz Master

RHP Arms

Joined
09 Jun 07
Moves
48794
Clock
31 Dec 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
The following is what creationwiki has on Dr. Don Batten.

http://creationwiki.org/Don_Batten.
I just had to look at http://creationwiki.org/Don_Batten

Apparently he wrote "The Creation Answers Book"

which answers "" about 60 of the 20 most asked questions ... about evolution ..."

mmm I wonder if the site's Science is as good as their Math?

RJHinds
The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
Clock
31 Dec 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by wolfgang59
I just had to look at http://creationwiki.org/Don_Batten

Apparently he wrote "The Creation Answers Book"

which answers "" about [b]60
of the 20 most asked questions ... about evolution ..."

mmm I wonder if the site's Science is as good as their Math?[/b]
It is supposed to say "over 60 of the most asked questions in 20 categories".
He should not be held responsible for someone else's error. See the following
for the actual information on the book:

http://usstore.creation.com/catalog/creation-answers-book-p-944.html?osCsid=pv8p4lm2mn0nerfb28n75e0ru1

u
semper fi

Joined
02 Oct 03
Moves
112520
Clock
31 Dec 11

You have to love the fact that a moron get rich off of other morons. The circle is complete. I am dreading RJ's "intellegent" quotes that he will pull from this book to teach us all how wrong we are. He already knows that we think the book is bogus, but he will try anyways.

Someone should invent a bug zapper for christians.

RJHinds
The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
Clock
31 Dec 11

Originally posted by usmc7257
You have to love the fact that a moron get rich off of other morons. The circle is complete. I am dreading RJ's "intellegent" quotes that he will pull from this book to teach us all how wrong we are. He already knows that we think the book is bogus, but he will try anyways.

Someone should invent a bug zapper for christians.
This is the Spiritual Forum not the Science Forum. So you are free to go
or not pay any attention to our belief in the Holy Spirit, if you wish.

u
semper fi

Joined
02 Oct 03
Moves
112520
Clock
31 Dec 11
1 edit

Originally posted by RJHinds
This is the Spiritual Forum not the Science Forum. So you are free to go
or not pay any attention to our belief in the Holy Spirit, if you wish.
If we athiests were not here, who would you have to preach to? Oh wait, you would further alienate other christians by telling them that they aren't believing the right way. I guess you don't need me after all.

That being said, what did my post have to do with the science forum? Is it because I mocked your favorite book (other than the bible)? Get a clue.

wolfgang59
Quiz Master

RHP Arms

Joined
09 Jun 07
Moves
48794
Clock
31 Dec 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
They could have made up or exaggerated how strong Samson was and the
day the Sun stood still in relation to the earth and even the story of the
tempting of Eve by Satan entering the Serpent.
Who or what gives you the power to determine what is "made up" in the bible?

wolfgang59
Quiz Master

RHP Arms

Joined
09 Jun 07
Moves
48794
Clock
31 Dec 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
It is supposed to say "over 60 of the most asked questions in 20 categories".
He should not be held responsible for someone else's error. See the following
for the actual information on the book:

http://usstore.creation.com/catalog/creation-answers-book-p-944.html?osCsid=pv8p4lm2mn0nerfb28n75e0ru1
You gave us the link; now you are saying the link is no good and giving us another!
Why don't you read these links yourself?

RJHinds
The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
Clock
31 Dec 11
2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by wolfgang59
You gave us the link; now you are saying the link is no good and giving us another!
Why don't you read these links yourself?
I read the link. But I gave the link to provide the bio on Dr. Don Batten
in contrast to the uknown person provided by FabianFnas that claims to
refute him. However, you missed the point and concentrated on a
mistatement about one of his books instead. Duh.

http://www.christiananswers.net/creation/people/batten-d.html

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.