Spirituality
02 Aug 14
Originally posted by robbie carrobieYou stated: "truths are truths", did you not?
On the contrary i have not stated nor given the impression that my truths are any more truthful than anyone elses. You are slobbering in that regard. Please try not to misrepresent what i have said.
What then did you mean by that, if it was not that truths are easy to identify and obvious.
Please explain.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieYou trying hard to be "amiable" again I see.
I have never claimed that you don't assimilate material so you are slobbering, infact i even stated that you do, so you can continue to slobber or you can try to represent what i have actually said, either way, you are slobbering.
Originally posted by FMFyes what i actually stated was, truths are truths, if you can find in that statement where i lay claim to those truths or that i have proclaimed in that statement that my truths are greater than your truths then please do so or you can continue to slobber and drool, either way, its a slobbery post you made.
Are you sure you haven't?
Originally posted by CalJustits a self evident statement, if something is true and found to be true, well its a truth, where have i laid claim to my truths being greater than anyone else's and how did you arrive at it from the statement, truths are truths, YOU EXPLAIN.
You stated: "truths are truths", did you not?
What then did you mean by that, if it was not that truths are easy to identify and obvious.
Please explain.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieHaven't you spent years here, and countless thousands of posts, stating or giving the impression that your "truths" are more truthful than others' "truths"?
yes what i actually stated was, truths are truths, if you can find in that statement where i lay claim to those truths or that i have proclaimed in that statement that my truths are greater than your truths then please do so or you can continue to slobber and drool, either way, its a slobbery post you made.
Originally posted by FMFThe statement was, truths are truths, where does that give the impression that my truths are greater than anyone elses? You have not said.
Haven't you spent years here, and countless thousands of posts, stating or giving the impression that your "truths" are more truthful than others' "truths"?
Originally posted by Proper KnobIs it my fault the internet is a veritable zombie apocalypse? Hardly.
The Carrobie Internet Forum Law (or the CIF law) -
As an online discussion with Robbie Carrobie grows longer, the probability of him using the words 'slime', 'slobber' or 'slaphead' approaches 1.
Originally posted by divegeesterIt is completely up to you, you asked I answered, you cannot be bothered
I’m not going to trawl through hundreds of your vague posts looking to piece together some sort of rational to help you justify why you refuse to allow FMF's experience to fit within the doctrine you believe in: i.e. that a Christian can lose their salvation.
Your reluctance to admit that you can't provide an answer this question is revealing about both your intellectual honesty and the fragmented approach you have to your religious dogma.
to look for the answer and you want me to look it up for you, or write it
again so you can blow that one off too maybe? Since you didn't care
enough to read it the first time I said it, and I may have answered you
twice not sure.
I don't care if you read the answer so, no I'm not going to look for it or
write it again. If you want to call that a flaw on my part, go for it.
Kelly