Originally posted by RJHindsThat is fine but these people have made some serious accusations against you Hindus on the basis of a statement that you made. I dont think thats fair.
For your information, I have never beat or even hit my wife during our heated arguments. I am sure we would not be together today, if that were the case.
28 Apr 14
Originally posted by robbie carrobieHe should have kept that kind of information to himself if he didn't want others to comment on it. Seeing as he posted it online it is additional information that can be used to shape an image of the character RJHinds.
people have done some terrible things in the past and i resent they way that you and these others are making an issue out of it for R.J.Hinds. Yes beating up on defenceless and innocent women is about as low as you can get, but no one here knows any of the details and to make an issue out of it like this with only partial knowledge is unfair. Clear ...[text shortened]... he issue is now resolved and he has had a happy and relatively successful marriage despite this.
It's a disgusting image.
28 Apr 14
1 edit
Originally posted by Great King RatNo one is saying that its attractive but you have only partial knowledge. Is it not better to try to understand the reasons first?
He should have kept that kind of information to himself if he didn't want others to comment on it. Seeing as he posted it online it is additional information that can be used to shape an image of the character RJHinds.
It's a disgusting image.
28 Apr 14
Originally posted by robbie carrobieEither he needs to explain the situation or he needs to keep his private life to himself (this would be my advice). As it stands Hinds has "attacked" his wife which does not make him look good. And that's a huge understatement.
No one is saying that its attractive but you have only partial knowledge.
28 Apr 14
Originally posted by Great King RatPeople change Great King Rat.
Either he needs to explain the situation or he needs to keep his private life to himself (this would be my advice). As it stands Hinds has "attacked" his wife which does not make him look good. And that's a huge understatement.
28 Apr 14
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWe all have and, further to the point, not even one of us is blameless or perfect. We've all messed and hurt others in the process, whether we realized and took ownership of our words and deeds or not. Who among us can cast the first stone?
People change Great King Rat.
- Joined
- 31 May 06
- Moves
- 1795
28 Apr 14
Originally posted by Grampy BobbySee this is something I dislike about the Christian
We all have and, further to the point, not even one of us is blameless or perfect. We've all messed and hurt others in the process, whether we realized and took ownership of our words and deeds or not. Who among us can cast the first stone?
[and monotheistic religions generally]
religion.
The idea that only god can sit in judgement of us and we are judged after death, basically based on the
last thing we did [repent or not].
We can absolutely judge each other and should do so.
Everyone has done good and bad things, everyone has made mistakes...
But some bad things are [much] worse than others, and some mistakes are [far] less forgiveable than others.
What Hinds appeared to be admitting to is of the latter category.
28 Apr 14
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyWith regards to attacking a woman?
We all have and, further to the point, not even one of us is blameless or perfect. We've all messed and hurt others in the process, whether we realized and took ownership of our words and deeds or not. Who among us can cast the first stone?
I can.
You?
28 Apr 14
Originally posted by robbie carrobieThat does not negate the fact of him having attacked his wife. It may be in his past, it's still something he must carry with him at all times.
People change Great King Rat.
Some things you don't shrug off as "what's done is done". Some things leave a permanent mark.
And based on his reply to me on page 2 which was in astoundingly bad taste I'd say he doesn't really care one way or the other.
He could've replied in a sincere way, maybe even in an angry way, but instead went with some hallelujah bs.
Originally posted by Great King Ratwhat did you expect? his position is indefensible. yes some things cannot be easily forgotten but neither you or I know much about it and its simply wrong to cast it up. I think anyway.
That does not negate the fact of him having attacked his wife. It may be in his past, it's still something he must carry with him at all times.
Some things you don't shrug off as "what's done is done". Some things leave a permanent mark.
And based on his reply to me on page 2 which was in astoundingly bad taste I'd say he doesn't really care one ...[text shortened]... replied in a sincere way, maybe even in an angry way, but instead went with some hallelujah bs.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieThen he should not have mentioned it. Either you shut up about it or you explain the situation and let people decide how they feel about it.
what did you expect? his position is indefensible. yes some things cannot be easily forgotten but neither you or I know much about it and its simply wrong to cast it up. I think anyway.
You seriously feel that his only sensible reply to my post could have been that hallelujah bs?
I think the only people who reply in such a ridiculous fashion to such a nasty post of mine are those who don't really think much of "attacking my wife". Read googlefudge's post after Hinds' post, maybe that one explains it better.
28 Apr 14
Originally posted by Great King Rat
[b]With regards to attacking a woman?
I can.
You?
Originally posted by Great King Rat
How about you, GB. Does it apply to you?
Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
2. and 17. in my early twenties: corporate career good fortunes eliminated 2. and I gradually grew out of 17.
Originally posted by Great King Rat
Are you sure you grew out of 17 (You find yourself judging others), GB?
Do you not judge others?
Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
Still "tempted to judge others" but resist in favor of making an objective evaluation and leaving the matter in God's hands. Whenever I succumb, 1 John 1:9 remedies the situation. Now you know why sometimes I post silence rather than ink.
Originally posted by Great King Rat
Two posts before you judged Dr. Rankin as an "attractive" MD.
Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
Au contraire, my Great King Rat: "making an objective evaluation." Take a peek.
Originally posted by Great King Rat
I did.
It's most definitely not objective to judge someone as being attractive, but rather it's very subjective.
She has pretty eyes, though.
Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
Men all have different criteria for attractiveness in women: two of mine are symmetry of body and an organized mind.
Originally posted by Great King Rat
That's fine. That's your subjective judgement of what makes a woman attractive.
Personally, I like my women donutshaped.
Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
Hey, to each his or her own. Poise, good manners, a sense of whimsy and humour and good posture I also appreciate.
Originally posted by robbie carrobie
People change Great King Rat.[/b]
Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
We all have and, further to the point, not even one of us is blameless or perfect. We've all messed and hurt others in the process, whether we realized and took ownership of our words and deeds or not. Who among us can cast the first stone?
Originally posted by Great King Rat
How about you, GB. Does it apply to you?
Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
2. and 17. in my early twenties: corporate career good fortunes eliminated 2. and I gradually grew out of 17.[/b]
Originally posted by Great King Rat
Are you sure you grew out of 17 (You find yourself judging others), GB?
Do you not judge others?
Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
Still "tempted to judge others" but resist in favor of making an objective evaluation and leaving the matter in God's hands. Whenever I succumb, 1 John 1:9 remedies the situation. Now you know why sometimes I post silence rather than ink.
Originally posted by Great King Rat
Two posts before you judged Dr. Rankin as an "attractive" MD.
Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
Au contraire, my Great King Rat: "making an objective evaluation." Take a peek.
Originally posted by Great King Rat
I did.
It's most definitely not objective to judge someone as being attractive, but rather it's very subjective.
She has pretty eyes, though.
Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
Men all have different criteria for attractiveness in women: two of mine are symmetry of body and an organized mind.
Originally posted by Great King Rat
That's fine. That's your subjective judgement of what makes a woman attractive.
Personally, I like my women donutshaped.
Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
Hey, to each his or her own. Poise, good manners, a sense of whimsy and humour and good posture I also appreciate.
Originally posted by robbie carrobie
People change Great King Rat.
Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
We all have and, further to the point, not even one of us is blameless or perfect. We've all messed and hurt others in the process, whether we realized and took ownership of our words and deeds or not. Who among us can cast the first stone?
Originally posted by Great King Rat
With regards to attacking a woman?
I can.
You?
GKR, my moral authority derives from the Absolute Righteousness and Justice of Omniscient, Omnipotent, Omnipresent Sovereign God; I leave these matters with believers and unbelievers in Christ in God the Father's capable hands. So, no.
28 Apr 14
Originally posted by Great King RatHmm.
http://www.redhotpawn.com/board/showthread.php?subject=%22Why_Are_Atheists_Always_Attacking_Christians%3F%22&threadid=158969
Page 1.
In reply to redbarons who said [b]I am married to a Christian and I swear not once in 42 years have I attacked her the diamond we call RJHinds replied I wish I could say the same. However, fortunately for m ...[text shortened]... pid actions and we avoided divorce and I eventually learned better.
I wish I was jesting.[/b]