19 Oct 11
2 edits
Originally posted by RJHindshttp://thepreachingwork.xanga.com/416884437/item/
I think he is referring to the incompetent Watchtoeer translators who came up
with the New World Translation.
Notice the comments made about the trinity in the above link............
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_World_Translation_of_the_Holy_Scriptures
20 Oct 11
Originally posted by galveston75Your Link mentions one scholar EDGAR J. GOODSPEED that I would be
http://thepreachingwork.xanga.com/416884437/item/
Notice the comments made about the trinity in the above link............
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_World_Translation_of_the_Holy_Scriptures
interested in knowing if you have a reliable reference to what he actually
said about the NWT. Do you have such a reference that is not biased
by the Watchtower?
20 Oct 11
Originally posted by RJHindsI found this on the website that seems to tell a diferent story as
Your Link mentions one scholar EDGAR J. GOODSPEED that I would be
interested in knowing if you have a reliable reference to what he actually
said about the NWT. Do you have such a reference that is not biased
by the Watchtower?
to what Dr. Goodspeed said about the NWT.
http://www.forananswer.org/Top_JW/Scholars%20and%20NWT.htm#Goodspeed
20 Oct 11
Originally posted by RJHindswho cares what he thinks, we are interested in the text not what some disgruntled ex
David Reed, an ex-Witness, says in his book, Jehovah's Witnesses Answered
Verse by Verse that basically the New World Translation came into being for
the sole purpose of supporting Watchtower doctrines showing their own bias
(pp.17-18). Reed says, "So, during the 1950's, Watchtower leaders went
beyond interpretation by producing their own version of the ...[text shortened]... loser agreement with
what the organization teaches."
http://www.watchman.org/jw/nwt.htm
witness states, you think that by now you would have learned that opinions are of
absolutely no value to me. I say this to spare you the effort of posting the opinions of
others, they prove nothing more than the people that uttered them have not the
remotest idea what the Greek text states, because like you, they cannot read Greek.
Just saying.
20 Oct 11
Originally posted by robbie carrobieYou should be interested in what he stated and why he is disgruntled
who cares what he thinks, we are interested in the text not what some disgruntled ex
witness states, you think that by now you would have learned that opinions are of
absolutely no value to me. I say this to spare you the effort of posting the opinions of
others, they prove nothing more than the people that uttered them have not the
remotest idea what the Greek text states, because like you, they cannot read Greek.
Just saying.
so you could do something about the problem whether he is right or
wrong. You just want to ignore anything negative, so you don't have
to deal with it in a responsible manner. Another one of your cowardly
traits of hiding your head in the sand.
20 Oct 11
Originally posted by RJHindsI dont care what he said nor what he thinks, i know what the Greek text states, his
You should be interested in what he stated and why he is disgruntled
so you could do something about the problem whether he is right or
wrong. You just want to ignore anything negative, so you don't have
to deal with it in a responsible manner. Another one of your cowardly
traits of hiding your head in the sand.
points of view is absolutely irrelevant in this regard.
(Proverbs 19:28) . . .A good-for-nothing witness derides justice, and the very mouth of
wicked people swallows down what is hurtful.
20 Oct 11
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI think he is a good-for-something witnesses. He sheds light on the dark
I dont care what he said nor what he thinks, i know what the Greek text states, his
points of view is absolutely irrelevant in this regard.
(Proverbs 19:28) . . .A good-for-nothing witness derides justice, and the very mouth of
wicked people swallows down what is hurtful.
practices of the Watchtower.
20 Oct 11
Originally posted by divegeesterBut he gets over it real quick. Look at me, sometimes he seems furious
Keep watching I will inevitably post something else you either can't argue with or your delicate spiritual sensibilities are offended by - and so you will be able to gbaway me again.
with me and appears not to want to talk to me again. The the next thing
you know, we seem to be the best buddies again. Who would have thunk it?
20 Oct 11
Originally posted by divegeesteri do not mind you having a go at me personally, nor of discussing the sacred text, i see
Keep watching I will inevitably post something else you either can't argue with or your delicate spiritual sensibilities are offended by - and so you will be able to gbaway me again.
no reason to repeat the same things over and over again, nor to tolerate caustic vitriol
when the whole universe knows we are pure awesomeness personified.
20 Oct 11
1 edit
Originally posted by RJHindsi dont hold grudges nor resentment in for long, its one of my few endearing qualities. I
But he gets over it real quick. Look at me, sometimes he seems furious
with me and appears not to want to talk to me again. The the next thing
you know, we seem to be the best buddies again. Who would have thunk it?
readily admit that i can be intolerant, dictatorial, dismissive and arrogant, but
unforgiving i am not.