subjective science

Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-duke
Quite a weak explanation. Do you have a better one?

Originally posted by @dj2becker
For mutations? Do you even have one?

Originally posted by @dj2becker
In order to get performance you require design no?

That's right, everyone knows performance is achieved haphazardly via random forces. But don't tell your boss or employer that when you're undergoing a performance review... management is too stupid to understand what you know.


Performance:
the action or process of carrying out or accomplishing an action, task, or function.
"the continual performance of a single task reduces a man to the level of a machine"
synonyms: carrying out, execution, discharge, accomplishment, completion, fulfillment, dispatch, implementation;
formal effectuation
"the continual performance of a single task"
an action, task, or operation, seen in terms of how successfully it was performed.
"pay increases are now being linked more closely to performance"
the capabilities of a machine, vehicle, or product, especially when observed under particular conditions.
"the hardware is put through tests that assess the performance of the processor"
synonyms: functioning, working, operation, running, behavior, capabilities, capability, capacity, power, potential
"the performance of the processor"

Originally posted by @lemon-lime
That's right, everyone knows performance is achieved haphazardly via random forces.

Originally posted by @wolfgang59
London wasn't designed.
It evolved haphazardly.
But it performs very well.

There are thousands of examples of things evolving
through chance to create something very functional.

Originally posted by @wolfgang59
That's right. NO

Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-duke
Are you volunteering your services?

Originally posted by @dj2becker
For what?

I've just realised what hell is ...
an evening down the pub with dj2becker
having to summarise the conversation so far every minute.

Originally posted by @dj2becker
The point that you are so desperately trying to mis is that you would never doubt that a computer is a product of design but you aren't even willing to consider that the human brain was designed even if the brain outperforms any computer. That dear wolfie is intellectual dishonesty.

Originally posted by @kazetnagorra
There's evidence that a computer has been designed.

There's no evidence that life has been designed.

Originally posted by @wolfgang59
London wasn't designed.
It evolved haphazardly.
But it performs very well.

There are thousands of examples of things evolving
through chance to create something very functional.

London wasn't designed.
It evolved haphazardly.
But it performs very well.

Originally posted by @sonship
I think it is safe to follow the evidence of computer design because you know it will only lead to human beings.

I think you are not willing to follow the evidence to the design in life because that would lead to something more than humans.

The solution for you, I think, is to say that there is no evidence for design in life.
I would expect vehement denial of this from you though.

Originally posted by @kazetnagorra
It's possible I have not been made aware of evidence in favour of design. Perhaps you could present some?