@fmf saidAssuming we give our conscience the time of day some view that as a hindrance to be done away with.
It is human nature. We have our moral compasses to guide us, but sometimes when we weigh the benefit [to us] of an action against its detriment to others, it creates a dilemma that our conscience wrestles with.
It is human nature. We have our moral compasses to guide us, but sometimes when we weigh the benefit [to us] of an action against its detriment to others, it creates a dilemma that our conscience wrestles with.
If this moral compass analogy is valid then entails that there are in truth moral DIRECTIONS.
The compass points to true North and true South and so forth.
So if these directions stand for moral abolutes that human beings should live by
how is is that the "moral compass" in humans is aware of them ?
From where does the moral compass derive its awareness of the true moral directions in the universe ?
@ghost-of-a-duke saidIf you are suggesting what is right for you may not be right for me, that works for opinions not absolute standards of right and wrong.
It doesn't. Our moral compass is a direct result of the society we grew up in and how we have developed as a person. Your north might very well not be my north.
@kellyjay saidI said nothing of absolutes.
If you are suggesting what is right for you may not be right for me, that works for opinions not absolute standards of right and wrong.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidWhat are you saying what is true for you is different from what is true for me?
I said nothing of absolutes.
16 Feb 22
@ghost-of-a-duke saidYes, if there is no absolute right and wrong all disputes over what is good and bad are meaningless. If I want to do anything you may like it or not, but to condemn me you don’t have anything but an opinion if there are no absolute standards we both have to live by.
Fred grew up on a remote island where cannibalism was perfectly acceptable.
Dave grew up in London where cannibalism was barbaric and wrong.
You do a lot of condemning here nonetheless as if others should know better in how they should behave and you argue why your judgments should be acceptable. For many of the disputes I see you in I can accept some of your judgments, because your right, without a standard for truth there is no right, just another opinion.
16 Feb 22
@ghost-of-a-duke saidThis reminds me of an example of love given here years ago. Some love their neighbors, so they do kind and good things to them; others love their neighbors because they are tasty. Do you have a preference?
Fred grew up on a remote island where cannibalism was perfectly acceptable.
Dave grew up in London where cannibalism was barbaric and wrong.
@sonship saidThe moral compass is shaped by a synthesis of "nature" and "nature". The "awareness" that the compass exists, what its for, and how its used is a function of our consciousness.
From where does the moral compass derive its awareness of the true moral directions in the universe ?
@kellyjay saidOf course it can be different. This is "true" for you: "Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind". Morally speaking, there isn't anything "true" about it.
What are you saying what is true for you is different from what is true for me?