Spirituality
24 Mar 18
02 Apr 18
Originally posted by @karoly-aczelWhoosh.
Boy are you nuts. At least you can admit you attack people.
C'mon now, don't lose your water
02 Apr 18
Originally posted by @divegeesterYou felt that you had to say that, right?
Way to go with the off topic ranting excuses.
Because you don't have the 'nads to directly face what I said.
Who's "unprincipled" now?
02 Apr 18
Originally posted by @romans1009The jury is still out on who first used this in a post here at RHP, whether it was FMF or me, but it's a forum classic.
That’s a great sound effect, suzianne!
Originally posted by @divegeesterI don't get it, Dive.
I quoted you on that several times in my reply if you actually bothered to read my post instead of drooling over it.
Are you on the vodka again? Sober up Jacob.
I actually never had this issue because I never operated from the perspective that man is fundamentally good.
And yet in the other thread you talk about mankind/people deserving to be punished and sent to hell. If mankind is “fundamentally good”, why does he deserve punishment?
...
Man's "goodness" is like nothing. We have to follow the words of Christ to be good at all.
So not “fundamentally good” after all then?
>Man is not fundamentally good (Philokalia)
"And yet in the other thread you talk about mankind/people deserving to be punished and sent to hell. If mankind is “fundamentally good”, why does he deserve punishment? " - Dive.
I did not say that he is fundamentally good...?
"Man's "goodness" is like nothing. We have to follow the words of Christ to be good at all.
So not “fundamentally good” after all then? "
I did not say we are fundamentally good.
... And you accuse me of being drunk when you have not properly comprehended the original sentence.
Originally posted by @romans1009Wow what an amazing compliment, perhaps suzianne will send you nudes now huh.
That’s a great sound effect, suzianne!
02 Apr 18
Originally posted by @philokaliaThis is blatantly obvious, and I’m not going to be raking the turds out of the gravel of your drunken ramblings once again.
I don't get it, Dive...
- Joined
- 31 Jan 18
- Moves
- 3456
02 Apr 18
Originally posted by @divegeesterYou don’t see I’m posting smarmy posts to suzianne to amuse you?!
Wow what an amazing compliment, perhaps suzianne will send you nudes now huh.
Whoosh!
- Joined
- 31 Jan 18
- Moves
- 3456
02 Apr 18
Originally posted by @divegeesterProjection city!
This is blatantly obvious, and I’m not going to be raking the turds out of the gravel of your drunken ramblings once again.
- Joined
- 31 Jan 18
- Moves
- 3456
Originally posted by @philokaliaI caught this obvious miscomprehension by dive when it happened. Rather than admit he misconstrued what you wrote through his watery, bloodshot eyes and throbbing noggin, he accuses you of being drunk.
I don't get it, Dive.
[quote]I actually never had this issue because I never operated from the perspective that man is fundamentally good.
And yet in the other thread you talk about mankind/people deserving to be punished and sent to hell. If mankind is “fundamentally good”, why does he deserve punishment?
...
Man's "goodness" is like nothing. ...[text shortened]... And you accuse me of being drunk when you have not properly comprehended the original sentence.
dive projects more than anyone else on here.
Next thing you know, he’ll be accusing me of engaging in drunken tickle fights with my blokes and having to take out a second mortgage to pay my pub tab.
- Joined
- 31 Jan 18
- Moves
- 3456
Originally posted by @philokaliaI think he just doesn’t want to admit he’s wrong.
I am honestly dumbfounded that he's doubling down myself.
It just doesn't make sense.
What, do you think we'll make fun of you for misreading something because that's what you'd do to us?
Sad!
03 Apr 18
Originally posted by @suzianneWhat jury? It’s been around on the Internet for years, it was neither you nor FMF.
The jury is still out on who first used this in a post here at RHP, whether it was FMF or me, but it's a forum classic.