Spirituality
21 Oct 14
Originally posted by C HessDid you ever stop to think that science will never come close to explaining how anything came into existence?
I'm saying that, scientifically speaking, creationism doesn't even come close to explaining how everything came into existence. Creationism isn't science, is another way to put it.
Again, there is no scientific way to currently know how the world was created, or if it was created. We can hypothesise on the topic, but those hypotheses can't be directly tes ...[text shortened]... ion for the biological diversity we see today, so no, it's not something we take on blind faith.
Of course any other explanation other than a scientific one will ever answer that question for the atheist even though it will take 14.5 billion years to find the answer.
No doubt the point is lost on you. 😉
Originally posted by josephwOne can be both religious and scientist, you know? So, if there's a truth claim to be made about everything science can't currently answer, I have no problem with that. Just call it what it is: a religious belief.
Did you ever stop to think that science will never come close to explaining how anything came into existence?
Of course any other explanation other than a scientific one will ever answer that question for the atheist even though it will take 14.5 billion years to find the answer.
No doubt the point is lost on you. 😉
Why am I (and so many others) against including religion in science? Because science has proven very useful specifically because it only deals with testable reality. The moment we start assuming that there can be supernatural agents interfering with reality, we can't predict anything and the resulting science becomes useless in a practical sense. We start performing rituals and such, hoping to please our gods, and what not - praying away illnesses and things of that nature. Science would then become just another opinionbox, a way to express identity and cultural belonging, like religion and politics. And once you're trapped inside an opinionbox, it gets very hard to change your mind, agree on things and accomplish anything really useful.
Like you said: you believe this, I believe that, who is right?
With science untainted by religious thought, we can (at least in matters of physical reality) determine who's right.
Originally posted by RJHindsAnd we'd have to suck it up. 🙂
When they finally tell us that God did it, we will just say we told you that from the beginning. 😏
Though, what are the odds that we will find evidence in the physical world that can only be explained by the goddidit-hypothesis? As long as natural explanations exist, they are always preferable in science. I'm sure you agree about that, considering the state of medicine before modern science.
Originally posted by C HessThere was no need for medicine before the fall of man. Even our use of medicine now is not free of side effects as any commercial you see for medicine on television will tell you.
And we'd have to suck it up. 🙂
Though, what are the odds that we will find evidence in the physical world that can only be explained by the goddidit-hypothesis? As long as natural explanations exist, they are always preferable in science. I'm sure you agree about that, considering the state of medicine before modern science.
Originally posted by RJHindsSide effects like dry mouth and dizziness beats things like death or complete paralysis in my opinion.
There was no need for medicine before the fall of man. Even our use of medicine now is not free of side effects as any commercial you see for medicine on television will tell you.
06 Nov 14
Originally posted by sonhouseI did not say all medicine is bad. I am just pointing out that most medicines can cause side effects that may be as bad or worse as the condition it is designed by man to correct.
So now all medicine is bad and it is the fault of those evil evolutionists?
If we had not sinned against God there would not be no need for medicine, because God would have allowed us to eat the fruit of life. Man made medicine is not nearly as good as the fruit of life that was designed by God.
Originally posted by RJHinds"Most" medicine comprise exactly what percentage of all modern medicine, would you say?
I did not say all medicine is bad. I am just pointing out that most medicines can cause side effects that may be as bad or worse as the condition it is designed by man to correct.
If we had not sinned against God there would not be no need for medicine, because God would have allowed us to eat the fruit of life. Man made medicine is not nearly as good as the fruit of life that was designed by God.