@fmf saidSo you argue against free will by coming up with a false dichotomy..?
If I receive an unsolicited text on my phone this morning, that tells me that I am being given $1,000,000 by someone in Nigeria, does my "free will" give me a "choice" between EITHER simply collecting the $1,000,000 and then going out and spending it OR not collecting the $1,000,000 and making do without it?
Or are you just saying free will doesn't exist in a roundabout way?
@philokalia saidI don't see it as a false dichotomy. I see it as an apt analogy for the notion of the "free gift" that your version of "free will" somehow renders real, not just for you, but for everyone. What's more, the "not collecting the £1,000,000" according to your religious beliefs, is analogous to the imposition of a morally incoherent, brutally violent, neverending punishment.
So you argue against free will by coming up with a false dichotomy..?
@philokalia saidI've been elaborating on it to you for three years. Have you simply forgotten it all?
There's no argument here, FMF.
You said:
"Hell is morally incoherent."
"What you say about free will doesn't make sense"
None of these are really elaborated on, no reason is given, and it does not appear to be any kind of debating, but just asserting things.
When it comes to the beliefs posters like you and sonship have regarding the supernatural, all you are ever doing is "asserting things" where you have no evidence that the things you are talking about actually exist.
'Eternal torture in burning flames for not believing in Jesus is morally coherent BECAUSE IT JUST IS.' Right? When it boils down to it, that's what you've got. And remember, coherence and credibility are intertwined.
16 Jun 21
@philokalia saidI am not using any extraneous or disingenuous argumentation.
We cannot discuss hell until we can pin down your position on these things because it would be useless to get ahead of ourselves only for you to [i]come up with extraneous, disingenuous argumentation to distract us again.
16 Jun 21
@philokalia saidWhat do you believe is the reason for non-believers to be spared being tortured for eternity?
Sure, I believe it is the case that those who truly cannot believe are potentially saved; this is talked about in the parable of Luke 12.
Am I "saved" from being tortured because of Luke 12? My loss of faith was honest, real and sincere, and I am just as moral in my behaviour as I was when I was a Christian. I don't believe in Jesus. Am I "saved"?
@fmf saidSo why is free will not real?
I don't see it as a false dichotomy. I see it as an apt analogy for the notion of the "free gift" that your version of "free will" somehow renders real, not just for you, but for everyone. What's more, the "not collecting the £1,000,000" according to your religious beliefs, is analogous to the imposition of a morally incoherent, brutally violent, neverending punishment.
@fmf said"Refer to our arguments over the last three years..."
I've been elaborating on it to you for three years. Have you simply forgotten it all?
When it comes to the beliefs posters like you and sonship have regarding the supernatural, all you are ever doing is "asserting things" where you have no evidence that the things you are talking about actually exist.
'Eternal torture in burning flames for not believing in Jesus is morall ...[text shortened]... t boils down to it, that's what you've got. And remember, coherence and credibility are intertwined.
LOL
It is impossible to get you to plant your feet down and discuss something. When you are not sealioning, you just want to debate like quicksand: step into my pit of Forum drama and past references - and never leave!
@fmf said... And so you will not answer my questions... 🙄
I am not using any extraneous or disingenuous argumentation.
... But these are important questions for the debate even if you are not planning on using disingenuous arguments. So, please do!
@fmf saidI do not know the case because it may actually be that there is somehow some impossibility for you to further believe. I cannot be the judge of that.
What do you believe is the reason for non-believers to be spared being tortured for eternity?
Am I "saved" from being tortured because of Luke 12? My loss of faith was honest, real and sincere, and I am just as moral in my behaviour as I was when I was a Christian. I don't believe in Jesus. Am I "saved"?
I can say that I believe that there are people who might have psychological dispositions which prevent them from drawing near to God who will receive His Mercy.
16 Jun 21
@philokalia saidThis is a condescending mischaracterization of my contribution and I think the idea you "are trying to get to the heart of the debate" is a mischaracterization of yours. I think you have simply some relatively recently internalized dogma to recite and you just filter out questions and points that you don't care for.
You are a very confusing man: short posts but with long, verbose sentences leading nowhere but to angry and personal gripes, and then accuse people of evading i when they are trying to get to the heart of the debate.
16 Jun 21
@philokalia saidWhat would be the moral purpose of torturing me for eternity for not finding your religious beliefs credible?
Are you responsible for the choices you make? Or are all the things we choose - and we believe - predetermined and beyond our control..?
16 Jun 21
@philokalia saidWell, I am an agnostic atheist, and, if there is a God ~ a creator being ~ I don't believe it has communicated with us and I don't believe it has offered any rewards or made any threats.
Do you acknowledge that God does judge people based on who they are as individuals (Luke 12)?
You are relaying a threat - to me - of eternal torture that's been codified by your religion.
What is the purpose of that threat if I don't find it credible?
What is the moral purpose of carrying it out [in secret] after I die if it didn't succeed in deterring or coercing me while I was alive?
16 Jun 21
@philokalia said"Free will" when it comes to supernatural things? My answer about this is the same as it was a few days ago. Have you forgotten it?
So why is free will not real?
16 Jun 21
@philokalia saidI have discussed the moral incoherence of eternal torture at length with you maybe a half a dozen times. My feet have been planted down repeatedly, constantly and consistently.
It is impossible to get you to plant your feet down and discuss something.