Go back
The Gospels

The Gospels

Spirituality

b

Joined
16 Dec 04
Moves
97738
Clock
05 May 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Nemesio
I haven't heard from you. Do you understand the contradiction now?
I believe there is no cotradiction. All the Gospel say the same thing.

Maustrauser
Lord Chook

Stringybark

Joined
16 Nov 03
Moves
88863
Clock
06 May 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by blindfaith101
I believe there is no cotradiction. All the Gospel say the same thing.
I assume that's why you are called BLINDfaith. Can't see it even when clearly explained.

Nemesio
Ursulakantor

Pittsburgh, PA

Joined
05 Mar 02
Moves
34824
Clock
06 May 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by blindfaith101
I believe there is no cotradiction. All the Gospel say the same thing.
Then you are illiterate. You lack the apparatus to recognize a contradiction when
you see one.

As such, you are utterly unqualified to relate any of the more complicated passages
of the Bible to any interested potential seekers. You are unable to appreciate the
Truth of that which you pretend to read.

Nemesio

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
06 May 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Nemesio
Then you are illiterate. You lack the apparatus to recognize a contradiction when
you see one.

As such, you are utterly unqualified to relate any of the more complicated passages
of the Bible to any interested potential seekers. You are unable to appreciate the
Truth of that which you pretend to read.

Nemesio
You obviously haven't received the Holy Spirit and the secret decoder ring.

Nemesio
Ursulakantor

Pittsburgh, PA

Joined
05 Mar 02
Moves
34824
Clock
06 May 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
You obviously haven't received the Holy Spirit and the secret decoder ring.
A secret decoder ring that makes it such that Nissan 14 and Nissan 15 are
one in the same, or that stone blocking the tomb was both moved before
and after the women arrived, is predicated on a lie and, as such, is by
necessity
not the Holy Spirit and is, instead the Devil, the Master of
Lies and Deceit.

Nemesio

vistesd

Hmmm . . .

Joined
19 Jan 04
Moves
22131
Clock
06 May 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Nemesio
A secret decoder ring that makes it such that Nissan 14 and Nissan 15 are
one in the same, or that stone blocking the tomb was both moved before
and after the women arrived, is predicated on a lie and, as such, is by
necessity
not the Holy Spirit and is, instead the Devil, the Master of
Lies and Deceit.

Nemesio
Yep, you obviously don't have that secret decoder ring. 😀

b

Joined
16 Dec 04
Moves
97738
Clock
10 May 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by vistesd
Yep, you obviously don't have that secret decoder ring. 😀
I hope though that you grab hold of the Salvation that JESUS CHRIST has been offerring you.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
15 Sep 04
Moves
7051
Clock
10 May 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Maustrauser
Most Biblical scholars agree that the four canonical gospels were written between 70 and 100 AD.

Matthew 70 - 100 AD
Mark 68 - 73 AD
Luke 80 -100 AD
John 90 -110 AD

And with both Matthew and Luke being more or less copies of Mark.

My question to our RHP Biblical scholars is this. Why do fundamentalists accept testimony written between forty ...[text shortened]... ese gospels were divinely inspired and therefore inerrant, why are they sometimes contradictory?
The evagelists who wrote the gospels did so under the authority of their teachers (i.e. Mark) Mark and a hypothesised source Q are the material used for the Synoptics (Matthew, Mark and Luke) while John kind of fills in the gaps. The don't contradict ech other if you read too literally.

Nemesio
Ursulakantor

Pittsburgh, PA

Joined
05 Mar 02
Moves
34824
Clock
11 May 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Conrau K
The evagelists who wrote the gospels did so under the authority of their teachers (i.e. Mark) Mark and a hypothesised source Q are the material used for the Synoptics (Matthew, Mark and Luke) while John kind of fills in the gaps. The don't contradict ech other if you read too literally.
So, can you answer the question I asked, about whether the Synoptics are correct and
Jesus was crucified the day following the Passover Seder, or if St John is correct and
He was crucified on the day before the Passover Seder?

Nemesio

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.