Originally posted by blindfaith101Then you are illiterate. You lack the apparatus to recognize a contradiction when
I believe there is no cotradiction. All the Gospel say the same thing.
you see one.
As such, you are utterly unqualified to relate any of the more complicated passages
of the Bible to any interested potential seekers. You are unable to appreciate the
Truth of that which you pretend to read.
Nemesio
Originally posted by NemesioYou obviously haven't received the Holy Spirit and the secret decoder ring.
Then you are illiterate. You lack the apparatus to recognize a contradiction when
you see one.
As such, you are utterly unqualified to relate any of the more complicated passages
of the Bible to any interested potential seekers. You are unable to appreciate the
Truth of that which you pretend to read.
Nemesio
Originally posted by no1marauderA secret decoder ring that makes it such that Nissan 14 and Nissan 15 are
You obviously haven't received the Holy Spirit and the secret decoder ring.
one in the same, or that stone blocking the tomb was both moved before
and after the women arrived, is predicated on a lie and, as such, is by
necessity not the Holy Spirit and is, instead the Devil, the Master of
Lies and Deceit.
Nemesio
Originally posted by NemesioYep, you obviously don't have that secret decoder ring. 😀
A secret decoder ring that makes it such that Nissan 14 and Nissan 15 are
one in the same, or that stone blocking the tomb was both moved before
and after the women arrived, is predicated on a lie and, as such, is by
necessity not the Holy Spirit and is, instead the Devil, the Master of
Lies and Deceit.
Nemesio
Originally posted by MaustrauserThe evagelists who wrote the gospels did so under the authority of their teachers (i.e. Mark) Mark and a hypothesised source Q are the material used for the Synoptics (Matthew, Mark and Luke) while John kind of fills in the gaps. The don't contradict ech other if you read too literally.
Most Biblical scholars agree that the four canonical gospels were written between 70 and 100 AD.
Matthew 70 - 100 AD
Mark 68 - 73 AD
Luke 80 -100 AD
John 90 -110 AD
And with both Matthew and Luke being more or less copies of Mark.
My question to our RHP Biblical scholars is this. Why do fundamentalists accept testimony written between forty ...[text shortened]... ese gospels were divinely inspired and therefore inerrant, why are they sometimes contradictory?
Originally posted by Conrau KSo, can you answer the question I asked, about whether the Synoptics are correct and
The evagelists who wrote the gospels did so under the authority of their teachers (i.e. Mark) Mark and a hypothesised source Q are the material used for the Synoptics (Matthew, Mark and Luke) while John kind of fills in the gaps. The don't contradict ech other if you read too literally.
Jesus was crucified the day following the Passover Seder, or if St John is correct and
He was crucified on the day before the Passover Seder?
Nemesio