Originally posted by deennyI would not say I am smart. I would say I am not a smart aleck any more.
Have you any other reason for dismissing evolution other than your smartness
By reading the Holy Bible, with a different attitude, I believe I have gained
much needed wisdom and knowledge. I no longer read it to just find fault.
I now believe the Holy Bible is correct if understood correctly. That does
not mean I understand everything in it, however. I have come to believe
there is a God and that he had something to do with having the scriptures
written for our benefit. Therefore, I try to pay attention to these writtings.
Evolution does not fit in with the truth of the scriptures as I see it. There
is no proof that biology or medical science needed the theory of evolution
to advance to where we are today. In fact, it may have retarded progress
by leading researchers in the wrong direction. Basically, I say there is
more evidence for creation than for evolution, unless you wish to call
adaptation, "evolution" instead.
Originally posted by RJHindsBasically, I say there is more evidence for creation than for evolution,
I would not say I am smart. I would say I am not a smart aleck any more.
By reading the Holy Bible, with a different attitude, I believe I have gained
much needed wisdom and knowledge. I no longer read it to just find fault.
I now believe the Holy Bible is correct if understood correctly. That does
not mean I understand everything in it, however. I h ...[text shortened]... nce for creation than for evolution, unless you wish to call
adaptation, "evolution" instead.
How many books have you read concerning the evidence for evolution? Answer none. That's all we need to know..
Originally posted by Dasal spit on and at everything you stand for.
This post is simply here to show that many others are also aware of the puddle, lightning bolt and then supposed spontaneous life theory.
There are those who pretend dishonestly to hide the fact that the following theories have not been taught as truth by cheating science, but they have...... and the soup and the lightning bolt have been pushed down our thr ...[text shortened]... e of this false theory presented by cheating science and taught as truth to the public.
You are worse than bile.
Originally posted by rvsakhadeoDid you catch Dasa's unequivocal proposal for the mass murder of Muslims all around the world a few nights ago before the thread was deleted?
Surely. a disagreement can be expressed without being disagreeable !
Why can we all, Dasa included, not observe some degree of courtesy and civility towards each other ?
Originally posted by Proper KnobAs I stated earlier,I missed whatever Dasa had posted regarding exterminating Muslims. If he posted this,it is condemnable to the highest degree. But is it right to say that EVERYTHING that Dasa posts is " Bile " and is fit to be "spat upon" ?
Do you think someone who believes that 23% of the worlds population should be exterminated should be dealt with courtesy and civility? Can you see why some people might get a little upset with those views?!
Originally posted by rvsakhadeoYou mean something along the lines of well-to-be-fair-Hitler-did-build-the-autobahns?
As I stated earlier,I missed whatever Dasa had posted regarding exterminating Muslims. If he posted this,it is condemnable to the highest degree. But is it right to say that EVERYTHING that Dasa posts is " Bile " and is fit to be "spat upon" ?
Originally posted by FMFI am sure that must be a misunderstanding, for Dasa does not believe in
Did you catch Dasa's unequivocal proposal for the mass murder of Muslims all around the world a few nights ago before the thread was deleted?
murder or any other type of killing. You know it upsets him when animals
are killed for food, which he calls slaughtering. So your statement does
not seem consistent with his beliefs posted on all the posts I have read of
his. So I think you must be mistaken and did not understand his post in
context.
Originally posted by FMFDid you not time and again wrote that Dasa is entitled to his views and that you respect his right to hold his views ? Hitler did actually commit genocide and other atrocities.Dasa may not be able to kill a fly, in real life. His mentors in the ISCKON will be horrified to find out that he posted about extermination of Muslims. Violence in language is discouraged in all sects/religions including Dasa's. But here he is talking about a Designer God having created the first life and stating that the evolutionists are wrong. So,these views may be incorrect but are they bile ?
You mean something along the lines of well-to-be-fair-Hitler-[b]did-build-the-autobahns?[/b]
22 Dec 11
Originally posted by RJHindsI know of at least 20 people who saw the thread before it was deleted. There has been no misunderstanding. There is no mistake about context, I can assure you. Dasa's proposed genocide was very plain spoken. Many people saw the thread. Did you see it yourself?
I am sure that must be a misunderstanding, for Dasa does not believe in
murder or any other type of killing. You know it upsets him when animals
are killed for food, which he calls slaughtering. So your statement does
not seem consistent with his beliefs posted on all the posts I have read of
his. So I think you must be mistaken and did not understand his post in
context.
Originally posted by rvsakhadeoWhy are you asking me?
...here [Dasa] is talking about a Designer God having created the first life and stating that the evolutionists are wrong. So,these views may be incorrect but are they bile ?
Did you not time and again wrote that Dasa is entitled to his views and that you respect his right to hold his views ?
Indeed. Just like nook7 is.
22 Dec 11
Originally posted by RJHindsThere was no misunderstanding of what Dasa wrote. It was pointed out to him that he did not approve of murder and he replied that it did not apply to Moslems as they were not innocent. The guy is just a dangerous twat
I am sure that must be a misunderstanding, for Dasa does not believe in
murder or any other type of killing. You know it upsets him when animals
are killed for food, which he calls slaughtering. So your statement does
not seem consistent with his beliefs posted on all the posts I have read of
his. So I think you must be mistaken and did not understand his post in
context.