18 Dec 16
Originally posted by EladarExcept that I would have a problem with that, I haven't actually caused such suffering, you have yet to establish that abortion is even "murder", and generally suck at debate and use inflammatory statements in a vain attempt to cover it. 😴
Funny how you have no problem letting another person suffer for your irresponsibility.
Originally posted by BigDoggProblemSo what would you do if you knocked up one of your acquaintances?
Except that I would have a problem with that, I haven't actually caused such suffering, you have yet to establish that abortion is even "murder", and generally suck at debate and use inflammatory statements in a vain attempt to cover it. 😴
Originally posted by SuzianneI support sterilization of people who dont want to have kids.
So.... let's get this straight.
You support sterilization for everyone in Africa?
Could this be because there are black people in Africa?
Could it be that the reason why people want to force birth control measures on Africans is because they are black?
18 Dec 16
Originally posted by EladarBecause you are male and can abdicate your responsibility for them at any time.
I think that genocide is when humans are being butchered legally simply because of they haven't been born yet. Even when tney have a heart beat and can feel pain they are being butchered with the government's blessing.
Add to this, of course, that you think it's just fine to fill the world with your progeny, simply because it's your progeny. Who cares about supporting them once they're born, right? Because you're so offended at not getting to spread your genes that you insist on saddling women with a responsibility they often didn't ask for.
Best of both worlds, eh?
Why is there no effective male birth control yet?
Yeah, once you understand that, you'll understand this post.
A woman's body belongs to that woman, not to any man.
18 Dec 16
Originally posted by SuzianneI have been married 20 years and have raised a son and daughter. I practice what I say is the way things should be. You know, the ideal that people think is not really possible.
Because you are male and can abdicate your responsibility for them at any time.
Add to this, of course, that you think it's just fine to fill the world with your progeny, simply because it's your progeny. Who cares about supporting them once they're born, right? Because you're so offended at not getting to spread your genes that you insist on sa ...[text shortened]... tand that, you'll understand this post.
A woman's body belongs to that woman, not to any man.
19 Dec 16
Originally posted by SuzianneThat luxury requires abstaining from sex until you are married. It is called taking personal responsibility and living by a moral standard when so many around you are not. It is called choosing a responsible mate.
Not everyone has that luxury, Mr. Republican.
19 Dec 16
Originally posted by EladarNo, it doesn't. It is possible - easily possible - for a person to have a few sexual partners before finding a suitable long-term mate. [I would even argue that for some people it is better to have had sex with their potential partner before the marriage to make sure the sex is OK, since they are committing to be with no one else from then on!]
That luxury requires abstaining from sex until you are married. It is called taking personal responsibility and living by a moral standard when so many around you are not. It is called choosing a responsible mate.
At the core of your judgments of others is the flawed idea that everyone should approach sex and marriage the same way. People are different. Some have more active sex drives; others not. Some people view sex and love as more separate things, while others view them as inseparable. It may have been right for you and others of your sexual disposition to save themselves for marriage, but it is arrogant [and wrong] to think that it is right for everyone else.