30 Oct 12
Originally posted by robbie carrobieDo you think the religionists I listed [leave yourself out] have acquitted themselves well, in particular with regard to the "To seek or to argue?" OP, on this thread?
Obviously it is pride that keeps me from admitting the truth, bwhahaha.
- Joined
- 31 May 06
- Moves
- 1795
30 Oct 12
Originally posted by FMFInteresting is probably not the word I would use...
Reading robbie's, and RJHind's, and sumydid's, and Grampy Bobby's, and galveston75's contributions to this thread has been very interesting.
Depressing would be more like it...
Frustrating would be another one...
Idiotic is another descriptor that comes to mind...
Perhaps indicative might be better...
It's indicative of how intellectually and morally bankrupt and indefensible their position is.
30 Oct 12
Originally posted by FMFI do not know, i have no read the thread and I have really no idea what it was about, i
Do you think the religionists I listed [leave yourself out] have acquitted themselves well, in particular with regard to the "To seek or to argue?" OP, on this thread?
was merely taken by thinkofones now obligatory remarks, 'pride is what prevents them
from ascertaining the truth', a statement which he should patent or copyright, for its
included in thousands of his other texts when he was active.
30 Oct 12
Originally posted by googlefudgebwhahahaha, here is a video to cheer you up,
Interesting is probably not the word I would use...
Depressing would be more like it...
Frustrating would be another one...
Idiotic is another descriptor that comes to mind...
Perhaps indicative might be better...
It's indicative of how intellectually and morally bankrupt and indefensible their position is.
all i can manage to push from my lips is a stream of absurd ideas!
all of my systems are down, down, down!
Originally posted by robbie carrobieDoes ThinkOfOne's comment that "pride is what prevents them from ascertaining the truth" ring true for what has come to pass on this thread, or are you seeking to dismiss his comment having not actually read the thread?
I do not know, i have no read the thread and I have really no idea what it was about, i
was merely taken by thinkofones now obligatory remarks, 'pride is what prevents them
from ascertaining the truth', a statement which he should patent or copyright, for its
included in thousands of his other texts when he was active.
30 Oct 12
Originally posted by robbie carrobieActually what I said was, "From what I can tell, it is pride that keeps them from admitting the truth." There is a difference.
I do not know, i have no read the thread and I have really no idea what it was about, i
was merely taken by thinkofones now obligatory remarks, 'pride is what prevents them
from ascertaining the truth', a statement which he should patent or copyright, for its
included in thousands of his other texts when he was active.
Please try to be more careful when attributing words to someone.
30 Oct 12
Originally posted by FMFIts a typical thinkofone comments, he has said it many times. Whether it rings true for
Does ThinkOfOne's comment that "pride is what prevents them from ascertaining the truth" ring true for what has come to pass on this thread, or are you seeking to dismiss his comment having not actually read the thread?
the thread i have no idea, not having read it.
30 Oct 12
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWhy would you comment on it if you hadn't read the thread? How does doing such an offhand and argumentative thing on your part place you with respect to the OP's "To seek or to argue?" theme?
Its a typical thinkofone comments, he has said it many times. Whether it rings true for
the thread i have no idea, not having read it.
30 Oct 12
Originally posted by FMFbecause i was commenting on the last text in the thread, i have neither sough to seek
Why would you comment on it if you hadn't read the thread? How does doing such an offhand and argumentative thing on your part place you with respect to the OP's "To seek or to argue?" theme?
nor to argue, it places me therefore in a balanced position.
30 Oct 12
Originally posted by robbie carrobieActually, insofar as I can recall, I've never said what you attributed to me. Why are you claiming that I've "said it many times" even after being corrected?
Its a typical thinkofone comments, he has said it many times. Whether it rings true for
the thread i have no idea, not having read it.
30 Oct 12
Originally posted by ThinkOfOneOk, you have made similar remarks many times Mr Pedant , oops perhaps its my pride
Actually, insofar as I can recall, I've never said what you attributed to me. Why are you claiming that I've "said it many times" even after being corrected?
that made me forget to quote you verbatim. bwahaha